1860 München vs Ulm: match statistics
1860 München vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
1860 München play Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
1860 München: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ulm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
1860 München scores 1.42 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Ulm scores 1.29 and concedes 2.05. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: 1860 München 61%, Ulm 74%. Over 2.5: 1860 München 58%, Ulm 66%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Ulm has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.40. 1860 München: 11.1 shots per match, Ulm: 11.8.
Match halves
1860 München: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.84. Ulm: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
1860 München: 76-90+ (17 goals). Ulm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I back the home win (1) — 1860 München averages 1.76 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.56, while Ulm score only 1.29 away with xG 1.42. The decisive edge is in the home defense: Ulm concede 2.18 goals on the road versus 1860 conceding 1.29 at home; a 0.89 goals-per-match differential and a home goal difference of +8 compared to Ulm’s -15 away give 1860 clear control. 1860 also generate better scoring opportunities at home — on average 4.76 shots on target and 12.18 total shots with 14% conversion, while Ulm have 3.71 shots on target, 12.06 total shots and 11% conversion. Over the last 5 matches, the hosts are 1-3-1, scoring 4 and conceding 6, while Ulm are 2-1-2, scoring 6 and conceding 9, which indicates greater defensive instability from the visitors. Considering Ulm’s high away loss rate (59%) and low away win rate (18%), I assess probabilities at 53% for 1860, 33% for a draw and 14% for an Ulm win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| 1860 München | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
1860 München is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - 1860 München · 0.8 pts / match - Ulm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
1860 München is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - 1860 München · 1.29 goals / match - Ulm
1860 München is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - 1860 München · 2.05 goals / match - Ulm
1860 München scores in 79% of matches (30 of 38 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).
Ulm scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while 1860 München keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — 1860 München
Over / Under — Ulm
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
1860 München is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - 1860 München · 0.92 pts / match - Ulm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
1860 München - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ulm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
1860 München
Ulm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| 1860 München | Liga | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.82 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.34 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 64% | ▲ 66% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 24% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 83% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: 1860 München 1 - 0 - 0 Ulm. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of 1860 München vs Ulm?
The 3. Liga match finished 1860 München 3:2 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before 1860 München vs Ulm?
1860 München score 1.42 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.29. The 3. Liga average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 61% of 1860 München's matches and 74% of Ulm's.
What form are 1860 München and Ulm in?
Over the last 5 games 1860 München have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ulm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 1860 München vs Ulm?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for 1860 München vs Ulm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.