3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval: match statistics
3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
3 de Noviembre played against Benjamin Aceval in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
3 de Noviembre has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.50 points per game. Benjamin Aceval has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
3 de Noviembre scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Benjamin Aceval scores 2.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of 3 de Noviembre's games and 0% of Benjamin Aceval's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Benjamin Aceval has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 0.85 per game. 3 de Noviembre takes 5.0 shots per game, while Benjamin Aceval takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
3 de Noviembre leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Benjamin Aceval leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
3 de Noviembre's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Benjamin Aceval, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Division Intermedia games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Benjamin Aceval is the favorite: they sit 4th in the table versus 3 de Noviembre in 14th, and this season have a record of 1-1-0 with 4 goals for and 0 against, while the hosts have 0-1-1 with 2 goals scored and 3 conceded. Away, Benjamin averages 14 shots per match (7 on target) and scores 4.0 goals per match with a conversion rate around 29% and xG 1.75, whereas 3 de Noviembre at home averages 6 shots (1 on target), 1.0 goals per match, 17% conversion and xG 0.97. Defensively the visitors look excellent — they concede 0.0 goals on average away and have 100% clean sheets, while the hosts concede 1.0 goals at home with xG against 1.69, indicating an advantage for the visitors in limiting chances. In the last 5 matches Benjamin has scored 6 goals and averages 1.6 points per match, and 3 de Noviembre has scored 5 but conceded 8 and averages 1.0 point per match; these trends confirm the visitors’ superior potential. Given the differences in shot volume, efficiency and xG I estimate the visitors at ~68% to win, 20% draw and 12% for the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors the 'BTTS - No' scenario: both teams have 0% matches with both scoring this season, while each records 100% clean sheets across the season. League-wide clean sheet rate is 61% with overall BTTS at 50%, indicating matches tend toward one side failing to score. In the last 5 matches, 3 de Noviembre had BTTS in 60% of games and conceded 1.6 goals per match on average; Benjamin Aceval has only 20% BTTS and concedes 0.8 goals on average, so the visitors show a more stable defense. Both teams produce similar xG (1.67 for hosts vs 1.75 for visitors), but xG against (1.49 vs 1.22), combined with 7 on-target shots for the visitors versus 6 for the hosts and a high visitor conversion rate of 29%, indicate the visitors effectively reduce BTTS risk. Considering the defensive indicators and seasonal metrics, I assess probability as 70% for 'No' and 30% for 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of a team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: hosts have attacking xG 1.67 versus opponents’ xG conceded 1.22 (=> ~1.45 expected goal), visitors have attacking xG 1.75 versus hosts’ xG conceded 1.49 (=> ~1.62), total ≈ 3.07. In the last 5 matches visitors have average xG 1.51 versus hosts 0.9, visitors scored 6 goals vs hosts 5 and conceded 4 vs hosts 8, which confirms the visitors’ greater attacking potential. With lambda = 3.07 the Poisson distribution yields probability for Over 1.5 ≈ 81%, Over 2.5 ≈ 59% and Over 3.5 ≈ 37%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, shot stats (11 vs 14) and shots on target (6 vs 7) and the visitors’ conversion rate 29% vs hosts 0% further support the Over 1.5 side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal indicates an away advantage: Benjamin Aceval led at half-time in 100% of their matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0) and averages 3.0 goals by the break (scoredAVGHT_away = 3.0) versus 0.0 for the home side (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0), therefore an HT lead for the away team is the most likely. Additionally, Benjamin Aceval averages 4.0 goals per match (seasonScoredAVG_away = 4.0) and has a shot conversion rate of 29% (shot_conversion_rate_away = 29.0), while 3 de Noviembre records 0.0 in these metrics, which strongly supports an away full-time win. This is backed by xG and activity data: xG_for_avg_away = 1.75 vs xG_for_avg_home = 1.67 and xg_against_avg_away = 1.22 vs xg_against_avg_home = 1.49, as well as average shots 14 vs 11 and shots on target 7 vs 6, increasing the likelihood of maintaining the lead after the break. Given these figures I assign the highest probability to the '2/2' scenario (70%), with lower chances for '2/X' (12%) and 'X/2' (10%); scenarios with the home team leading at half-time I assess as practically impossible (0%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| 3 de Noviembre | Benjamin Aceval | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 10% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 2.00 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Benjamin Aceval is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.5 pts / game - 3 de Noviembre · 2 pts / game - Benjamin Aceval
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Benjamin Aceval is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - 3 de Noviembre · 2 goals / game - Benjamin Aceval
3 de Noviembre scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Benjamin Aceval keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 games).
Benjamin Aceval scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while 3 de Noviembre keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - 3 de Noviembre
Over / Under - Benjamin Aceval
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Benjamin Aceval is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - 3 de Noviembre · 2 pts / game - Benjamin Aceval
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
3 de Noviembre - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Benjamin Aceval - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
3 de Noviembre
Benjamin Aceval
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| 3 de Noviembre | Liga | Benjamin Aceval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 30% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of 3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval?
The Division Intermedia match finished 3 de Noviembre 1:1 Benjamin Aceval. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before 3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval?
3 de Noviembre score 1.00 goals per game on average and Benjamin Aceval 2.00. The Division Intermedia average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 100% of 3 de Noviembre's matches and 0% of Benjamin Aceval's.
What form are 3 de Noviembre and Benjamin Aceval in?
Over the last 5 games 3 de Noviembre have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Benjamin Aceval 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for 3 de Noviembre vs Benjamin Aceval: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.