AB vs KÍ: match statistics
AB vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AB played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on April 20, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
AB has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. KÍ has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
AB scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.20. KÍ scores 2.60 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 20% of AB's games and 60% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.19 per game. AB takes 8.8 shots per game, while KÍ takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
AB leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 80% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
AB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match favorite is KÍ: the visitors have a season record of 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses with 13 goals scored and only 3 conceded, and they have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches. Away, KÍ averages 2.5 goals per game, xG 2.48 and 17.5 shots (9.5 on target) per match, while AB at home averages 8.5 shots (2.5 on target) and xG 1.29 per game. AB does have a 100% win rate in home fixtures and averages 2.0 goals per home match, but they have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches overall and average only 1.2 points in that period, indicating defensive issues. Additionally, KÍ concedes 0.5 goals on average away with xG against 0.87, whereas AB’s home xG against is 1.92, giving the visitors a clear advantage in quality of chances. Based on this, I predict a KÍ win, with probabilities roughly 60% for the away win, 25% for a draw and 15% for the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data favors the BTTS - Yes scenario: AB has BTTS in 67% of matches, KÍ in 50%, with the league average at 48%. KÍ shows significant attacking potential — averaging 17.5 shots and 9.5 shots on target per game with xG 2.48 — while AB concedes xG of 0.85 against them, indicating KÍ should score. AB’s defensive form is poor: 11 goals conceded in the last 5 matches (2.2 per game), whereas they’ve scored 7 in those 5 (1.4 per game), so the likelihood AB concedes at least once is high. Counter-signals include KÍ’s 50% clean sheets this season and the fact that BTTS occurred in only 40% of the last 5 matches for both teams, which reduces confidence in the BTTS outcome. In summary, considering 67% vs 50% seasonal BTTS, xG 2.48 vs 0.85 and AB’s 11 goals conceded in the last five, I assign higher probability to Yes — about 66% versus 34% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (average attack xG and xG against the opponent) yields a total of 2.64 expected goals: AB 0.98 (1.09 and 0.87) and KÍ 1.66 (2.48 and 0.85). Seasonal averages confirm a propensity for goals: AB scores 2.67 goals per match, KÍ 2.5, and season-long Over 1.5 rates are 67% and 50% respectively. Recent form further favors goals — KÍ have scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 avg), while AB conceded 11 goals in the last 5 (2.2 avg). Additional signals include KÍ’s 17.5 shots and 9.5 shots on target versus AB’s 7.33/3.67, and AB’s high conversion rate 36% vs KÍ 14%, indicating that both chance creation (KÍ) and finishing efficiency (AB) can translate into goals. Consequently the strongest and most confident pick is Over 1.5 (recommended), while Over 2.5 has moderate support (approx. 62%) and Over 3.5 remains less likely (approx. 31%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The primary signal indicates AB will lead at the break: the home side led at half-time in 3 of 3 matches (100%), scored a total of 5 first-half goals (1.67 on average) and conceded none before the break (0.0 first-half concession average). Over the full match AB have a seasonal goals-per-game average of 2.67 compared to KÍ’s 2.50, and the hosts won 67% of matches versus KÍ’s 50%; they average 2.33 points per game versus 2.0 for the visitors. The counterargument is KÍ’s offensive potency: KÍ’s xG is 2.48 versus 1.09 for AB and KÍ averages 17.5 shots (versus 7.33 for AB), which increases the chance of a turnaround after half-time. However, AB are markedly more efficient with fewer shots (conversion rate 36% vs 14%), which supports the likelihood of maintaining the lead; after the break KÍ score 1.5 goals on average and AB 1.0, so comebacks are possible but less likely. As a result I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (52%), with smaller chances for X/1 (11%) and KÍ comebacks distributed among the remaining options.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AB | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KÍ is 22% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - AB · 2.2 pts / game - KÍ
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KÍ is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.6 goals / game - AB · 2.6 goals / game - KÍ
KÍ is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - AB · 0.6 goals / game - KÍ
AB scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).
KÍ scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AB
Over / Under - KÍ
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KÍ is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - AB · 2.6 pts / game - KÍ
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KÍ - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 60%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AB
KÍ
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).
Teams vs league
| AB | Liga | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.80 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 50% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 58% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 31% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 65% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of AB vs KÍ?
The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished AB 1:1 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AB vs KÍ?
AB score 1.60 goals per game on average and KÍ 2.60. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 20% of AB's matches and 60% of KÍ's.
What form are AB and KÍ in?
Over the last 5 games AB have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KÍ 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AB vs KÍ?
The statistical background for AB vs KÍ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


