Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

AB vs KÍ: match statistics

AB crest
AB
1 : 1half-time 1:0
KÍ crest

AB vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AB played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on April 20, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

AB has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. KÍ has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

AB scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.20. KÍ scores 2.60 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 20% of AB's games and 60% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.19 per game. AB takes 8.8 shots per game, while KÍ takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

AB leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 80% and scores 1.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

AB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match favorite is KÍ: the visitors have a season record of 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses with 13 goals scored and only 3 conceded, and they have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches. Away, KÍ averages 2.5 goals per game, xG 2.48 and 17.5 shots (9.5 on target) per match, while AB at home averages 8.5 shots (2.5 on target) and xG 1.29 per game. AB does have a 100% win rate in home fixtures and averages 2.0 goals per home match, but they have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches overall and average only 1.2 points in that period, indicating defensive issues. Additionally, KÍ concedes 0.5 goals on average away with xG against 0.87, whereas AB’s home xG against is 1.92, giving the visitors a clear advantage in quality of chances. Based on this, I predict a KÍ win, with probabilities roughly 60% for the away win, 25% for a draw and 15% for the home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data favors the BTTS - Yes scenario: AB has BTTS in 67% of matches, KÍ in 50%, with the league average at 48%. KÍ shows significant attacking potential — averaging 17.5 shots and 9.5 shots on target per game with xG 2.48 — while AB concedes xG of 0.85 against them, indicating KÍ should score. AB’s defensive form is poor: 11 goals conceded in the last 5 matches (2.2 per game), whereas they’ve scored 7 in those 5 (1.4 per game), so the likelihood AB concedes at least once is high. Counter-signals include KÍ’s 50% clean sheets this season and the fact that BTTS occurred in only 40% of the last 5 matches for both teams, which reduces confidence in the BTTS outcome. In summary, considering 67% vs 50% seasonal BTTS, xG 2.48 vs 0.85 and AB’s 11 goals conceded in the last five, I assign higher probability to Yes — about 66% versus 34% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (average attack xG and xG against the opponent) yields a total of 2.64 expected goals: AB 0.98 (1.09 and 0.87) and KÍ 1.66 (2.48 and 0.85). Seasonal averages confirm a propensity for goals: AB scores 2.67 goals per match, KÍ 2.5, and season-long Over 1.5 rates are 67% and 50% respectively. Recent form further favors goals — KÍ have scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 avg), while AB conceded 11 goals in the last 5 (2.2 avg). Additional signals include KÍ’s 17.5 shots and 9.5 shots on target versus AB’s 7.33/3.67, and AB’s high conversion rate 36% vs KÍ 14%, indicating that both chance creation (KÍ) and finishing efficiency (AB) can translate into goals. Consequently the strongest and most confident pick is Over 1.5 (recommended), while Over 2.5 has moderate support (approx. 62%) and Over 3.5 remains less likely (approx. 31%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary signal indicates AB will lead at the break: the home side led at half-time in 3 of 3 matches (100%), scored a total of 5 first-half goals (1.67 on average) and conceded none before the break (0.0 first-half concession average). Over the full match AB have a seasonal goals-per-game average of 2.67 compared to KÍ’s 2.50, and the hosts won 67% of matches versus KÍ’s 50%; they average 2.33 points per game versus 2.0 for the visitors. The counterargument is KÍ’s offensive potency: KÍ’s xG is 2.48 versus 1.09 for AB and KÍ averages 17.5 shots (versus 7.33 for AB), which increases the chance of a turnaround after half-time. However, AB are markedly more efficient with fewer shots (conversion rate 36% vs 14%), which supports the likelihood of maintaining the lead; after the break KÍ score 1.5 goals on average and AB 1.0, so comebacks are possible but less likely. As a result I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (52%), with smaller chances for X/1 (11%) and KÍ comebacks distributed among the remaining options.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

29Possession (%)71
AB
7Shots25
AB
3Shots on target5
AB
1.17xG2.64
AB
5Corners9
AB
70Dangerous attacks97
AB
7Fouls5
AB
0Cards2
AB

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.6Goals scored / game2.6
AB
1.2Goals allowed / game0.6
AB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.8Shots per game11.4
AB
3.6Shots on target6
AB
18.2%Shot conversion22.8%
AB
51%Possession58%
AB
1.19xG for1.64
AB
1.7xG against0.86
AB

Shooting quality

AB: Efficient finishing: Efficient finishing
AB
Accuracy (shots on target)41%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KÍ is 22% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - AB · 2.2 pts / game - KÍ

AB
WWLWL
Season result split
60% W0% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
60% W40% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 63% better for: goals scored per game.

1.6 goals / game - AB · 2.6 goals / game - KÍ

KÍ is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - AB · 0.6 goals / game - KÍ

AB scoring profile: strong

AB scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).

KÍ scoring profile: mixed

KÍ scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)13
AB
6Goals conceded (season)3
AB
2.8Average goals per game3.2
AB
8Goals scored (last 5)13
AB
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
AB

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
AB
60%2 goals40%
AB
20%3 goals40%
AB
0%4 goals40%
AB

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal60%
AB
40%2 goals0%
AB
20%3 goals0%
AB
20%4 goals0%
AB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
AB
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AB
60%Scored in both halves40%
AB

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
AB
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AB
20%BTTS - last 560%
AB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
AB
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
AB
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
AB

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
AB
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
AB
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
AB

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - AB · 2.6 pts / game - KÍ

AB - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing
KÍ - half-time state
80% leading20% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)2.6
AB
1Goals scored (1st half)1.4
AB
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0
AB
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.4
AB
60%Clean sheet before half-time100%
AB
20%No goal before half-time20%
AB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per game (2nd half)1.6
AB
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
AB
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
AB
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.8
AB
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
AB
40%No goal after half-time60%
AB

AB - second-half results

60% W0% R40% P
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KÍ - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 60%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.80
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.60
Goals scored / game1.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+7+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AB
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
271%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

ABLiga
Average goals per game 2.802.73 3.20
Both teams scored 20%50% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%58% 40%
Clean sheets 60%31% 40%
Goal before half-time 100%65% 80%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+84%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defensive advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Yellow cardÁrni Frederiksberg
  2. SubstitutionOn: Daniel JohansenOff: Jean Carlos de Brito
  3. Yellow cardHallur Hansson
  4. SubstitutionOn: Gilli RólantssonOff: Erlend Hustad
  5. SubstitutionOn: Deni PavlovićOff: Dávid Reynheim
  6. ABSubstitutionOn: Ørvur IsfeldOff: Mathias Birk Friis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of AB vs KÍ?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished AB 1:1 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AB vs KÍ?

AB score 1.60 goals per game on average and KÍ 2.60. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 20% of AB's matches and 60% of KÍ's.

What form are AB and KÍ in?

Over the last 5 games AB have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KÍ 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AB vs KÍ?

The statistical background for AB vs KÍ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.