Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers: match statistics
Abia Warriors display impressive home form with a 50% win rate and only 8% losses at their home ground, making them a formidable opponent in front of their own fans. Additionally, the hosts boast a positive goal difference of +8 in home matches and impressive defensive efficiency, conceding an average of only 0.42 goals per game at home. Despite their higher position in the table, Enugu Rangers exhibit poor away form with only a 17% win rate and as many as 58% losses on the road, with a negative goal difference of -7. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.63 vs 1.25), and Rangers fail to score in 42% of their away matches. Considering Abia Warriors' home advantage and the visitors' away struggles, the most likely outcome is a home win, although Rangers' solid form in their last five overall matches (2 PPG) does not rule out a draw.
Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Abia Warriors played against Enugu Rangers in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on February 8, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Abia Warriors has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Enugu Rangers has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Abia Warriors scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 0.71. Enugu Rangers scores 1.17 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 1.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Abia Warriors's games and 38% of Enugu Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 33%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Enugu Rangers has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.37 per game. Abia Warriors takes 6.9 shots per game, while Enugu Rangers takes 6.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Abia Warriors leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Enugu Rangers leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
Abia Warriors's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Enugu Rangers, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.85 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abia Warriors display impressive home form with a 50% win rate and only 8% losses at their home ground, making them a formidable opponent in front of their own fans. Additionally, the hosts boast a positive goal difference of +8 in home matches and impressive defensive efficiency, conceding an average of only 0.42 goals per game at home. Despite their higher position in the table, Enugu Rangers exhibit poor away form with only a 17% win rate and as many as 58% losses on the road, with a negative goal difference of -7. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.63 vs 1.25), and Rangers fail to score in 42% of their away matches. Considering Abia Warriors' home advantage and the visitors' away struggles, the most likely outcome is a home win, although Rangers' solid form in their last five overall matches (2 PPG) does not rule out a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Abia Warriors | Enugu Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.51 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Enugu Rangers is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Abia Warriors · 2 pts / game - Enugu Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Enugu Rangers is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
0.83 goals / game - Abia Warriors · 1.17 goals / game - Enugu Rangers
Abia Warriors is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Abia Warriors · 0.83 goals / game - Enugu Rangers
Abia Warriors scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while Enugu Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).
Enugu Rangers scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while Abia Warriors keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Abia Warriors
Over / Under - Enugu Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Enugu Rangers is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Abia Warriors · 1.58 pts / game - Enugu Rangers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abia Warriors - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Enugu Rangers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Abia Warriors
Enugu Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Abia Warriors | Liga | Enugu Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.54 | 1.85 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 36% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Abia Warriors's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Enugu Rangers. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers?
The NPFL match finished Abia Warriors 0:0 Enugu Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers?
Abia Warriors score 0.83 goals per game on average and Enugu Rangers 1.17. The NPFL average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Abia Warriors's matches and 38% of Enugu Rangers's.
What form are Abia Warriors and Enugu Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Abia Warriors have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Enugu Rangers 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Abia Warriors vs Enugu Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.