Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a tightly contested match between two top-half teams. Abu Qair Semad boasts a solid home record with 50% wins and only 25% losses, yet their recent form is concerning, yielding just 1 point per match in their last 5 outings. Asyut Petroleum is in better shape (1.6 PPG) and holds an impressive 56% away win rate with only 11% losses. A key factor is the visitors' clinical finishing—16% shot conversion versus 8% for the hosts—which demonstrates greater efficiency despite a lower average xG (0.99 vs 1.67). Both sides are characterized by a low average of total goals per match (1.75 for the hosts, 1.67 for the visitors), suggesting a tactical, cautious approach. Given the hosts' dipping form, the visitors' solid defense (56% clean sheets away), and the evenly matched potential of both squads, a draw stands out as the most probable outcome.
Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Abu Qair Semad played against Asyut Petroleum in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on January 15, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Abu Qair Semad has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Asyut Petroleum has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Abu Qair Semad scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 0.83. Asyut Petroleum scores 1.06 and allows 0.72. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Abu Qair Semad's games and 28% of Asyut Petroleum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 33%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Abu Qair Semad has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.19 per game. Abu Qair Semad takes 7.0 shots per game, while Asyut Petroleum takes 6.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Abu Qair Semad leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. Asyut Petroleum leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Abu Qair Semad's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Asyut Petroleum, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a tightly contested match between two top-half teams. Abu Qair Semad boasts a solid home record with 50% wins and only 25% losses, yet their recent form is concerning, yielding just 1 point per match in their last 5 outings. Asyut Petroleum is in better shape (1.6 PPG) and holds an impressive 56% away win rate with only 11% losses. A key factor is the visitors' clinical finishing—16% shot conversion versus 8% for the hosts—which demonstrates greater efficiency despite a lower average xG (0.99 vs 1.67). Both sides are characterized by a low average of total goals per match (1.75 for the hosts, 1.67 for the visitors), suggesting a tactical, cautious approach. Given the hosts' dipping form, the visitors' solid defense (56% clean sheets away), and the evenly matched potential of both squads, a draw stands out as the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Abu Qair Semad | Asyut Petroleum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Asyut Petroleum is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad · 2.2 pts / game - Asyut Petroleum
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad · 1.06 goals / game - Asyut Petroleum
Asyut Petroleum is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad · 0.72 goals / game - Asyut Petroleum
Abu Qair Semad scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while Asyut Petroleum keeps a clean sheet in 61% (11 of 18 games).
Asyut Petroleum scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 games), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
Over / Under - Asyut Petroleum
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Asyut Petroleum is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad · 1.39 pts / game - Asyut Petroleum
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Asyut Petroleum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Abu Qair Semad
Asyut Petroleum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Abu Qair Semad | Liga | Asyut Petroleum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.11 | 1.91 | ▼ 1.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 41% | ▼ 28% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 39% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 39% | 38% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 72% | 69% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Abu Qair Semad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Asyut Petroleum. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum?
The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 1:0 Asyut Petroleum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum?
Abu Qair Semad score 1.28 goals per game on average and Asyut Petroleum 1.06. The Second Division average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 28% of Asyut Petroleum's.
What form are Abu Qair Semad and Asyut Petroleum in?
Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Asyut Petroleum 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum?
The statistical background for Abu Qair Semad vs Asyut Petroleum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.