Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 17 July 2026

Abu Qair Semad vs Masar: match statistics

Abu Qair Semad crest
Abu Qair Semad
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Masar crest
Masar
135%(2.07)
X35%(2.90)
230%(3.65)

The encounter promises to be extremely balanced, which speaks for a draw. Abu Qair Semad has a solid home record with 55% wins and an impressive 55% clean sheets, yet their recent form raises concerns – in the last 5 matches, they earned just 1.6 points per game. Masar presents even weaker disposition with only 0.6 points per game in the last five meetings and a streak of two defeats and three draws. Although the visitors have a better away record (67% wins in the season), their current form is critical. xG statistics are close for both teams (1.76 vs 1.55), and the difference in possession is minimal (51% vs 52%). Considering the drop in form for both teams and the balanced statistical parameters, a draw seems the most probable result of this duel.

Abu Qair Semad vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Abu Qair Semad play Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 26 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Abu Qair Semad: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Abu Qair Semad scores 1.18 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Abu Qair Semad 41%, Masar 38%. Over 2.5: Abu Qair Semad 32%, Masar 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.30. Abu Qair Semad: 9.6 shots per match, Masar: 8.7.

Match halves

Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59. Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (8 goals). Masar: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The encounter promises to be extremely balanced, which speaks for a draw. Abu Qair Semad has a solid home record with 55% wins and an impressive 55% clean sheets, yet their recent form raises concerns – in the last 5 matches, they earned just 1.6 points per game. Masar presents even weaker disposition with only 0.6 points per game in the last five meetings and a streak of two defeats and three draws. Although the visitors have a better away record (67% wins in the season), their current form is critical. xG statistics are close for both teams (1.76 vs 1.55), and the difference in possession is minimal (51% vs 52%). Considering the drop in form for both teams and the balanced statistical parameters, a draw seems the most probable result of this duel.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Abu Qair SemadMasar
11Shots7
Abu Qair SemadMasar
7Shots on target2
Abu Qair SemadMasar
1.58xG0.95
Abu Qair SemadMasar
2Corners5
Abu Qair SemadMasar
54Dangerous attacks49
Abu Qair SemadMasar
13Fouls16
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0Cards0
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Abu Qair SemadMasar
1.18Goals scored / match1.38
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.74Goals conceded / match0.85
Abu Qair SemadMasar
44%Average possession48%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
4.24Shots on target / match3.41
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.62Shots per match8.71
Abu Qair SemadMasar
4.24Shots on target3.41
Abu Qair SemadMasar
12.2%Shot conversion15.9%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
44%Possession48%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
1.59xG for1.3
Abu Qair SemadMasar
1xG against1.09
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Shooting quality

Abu Qair Semad: Counter-attackingMasar: Efficient finishing
Abu Qair SemadMasar
Accuracy (shots on target)44%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Abu Qair Semad is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.4 pts / match - Masar

Abu Qair Semad
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W38% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-13-6
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Masar
LWDLW
Season result split
44% W29% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-10-9
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-4-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.38 goals / match - Masar

Abu Qair Semad is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 0.85 goals / match - Masar

Abu Qair Semad scoring profile: strong

Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

Masar scoring profile: mixed

Masar scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

40Goals scored (season)47
Abu Qair SemadMasar
25Goals conceded (season)29
Abu Qair SemadMasar
1.91Average goals in match2.24
Abu Qair SemadMasar
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Abu Qair SemadMasar
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Abu Qair SemadMasar

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal65%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
26%2 goals38%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
15%3 goals18%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
3%4 goals12%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal62%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
15%2 goals21%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
6%3 goals3%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0%4 goals0%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
18%Scored in both halves32%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
40%BTTS - last 520%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.65 pts / match - Masar

Abu Qair Semad - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing
Masar - half-time state
38% leading50% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.65
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.91
Abu Qair SemadMasar
71%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
53%No goal before half-time50%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Abu Qair SemadMasar
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Abu Qair SemadMasar
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Abu Qair SemadMasar
68%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Abu Qair SemadMasar
59%No goal after half-time59%
Abu Qair SemadMasar

Abu Qair Semad - second-half results

35% W38% R26% P
50
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - second-half results

32% W32% R35% P
56
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Abu Qair Semad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Abu Qair Semad
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Masar
ScoredConceded
11
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Abu Qair Semad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Abu Qair SemadLigaMasar
Average goals in match 1.911.95 2.24
Both teams scored 41%41% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%32% 32%
Clean sheets 47%38% 38%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 65%67% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Abu Qair Semad 0 - 1 - 0 Masar. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Masar
1 : 1
Abu Qair Semad SC

FAQ

What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs Masar?

The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 1:1 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs Masar?

Abu Qair Semad score 1.18 goals per game on average and Masar 1.38. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 38% of Masar's.

What form are Abu Qair Semad and Masar in?

Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Masar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs Masar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Abu Qair Semad vs Masar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.