Abu Qair Semad vs Raya Ghazl: match statistics
Abu Qair Semad vs Raya Ghazl: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Abu Qair Semad played against Raya Ghazl in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on May 14, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Abu Qair Semad has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Raya Ghazl has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Abu Qair Semad scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 0.76. Raya Ghazl scores 0.61 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 1.95 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Abu Qair Semad's games and 42% of Raya Ghazl's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 42%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Abu Qair Semad has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.11 per game. Abu Qair Semad takes 9.2 shots per game, while Raya Ghazl takes 6.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Abu Qair Semad leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Raya Ghazl leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.39 after halftime.
When the teams score
Abu Qair Semad's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). For Raya Ghazl, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.95 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abu Qair Semad is the clear favorite: at home they average 1.13 goals per match with an average xG of 1.80, while Raya Ghazl score only 0.19 goals away and record an xG of 1.09. The hosts concede just 0.56 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 56% of matches, whereas the visitors concede 1.25 goals on the road and have no away wins (0% away victories). In their last 5 matches Abu Qair Semad are 1 win and 4 draws (1.4 points per game) and have conceded only 3 goals, while Raya Ghazl have lost 5 consecutive matches, scored 2 goals and conceded 12. Additionally, the hosts average 6.58 shots on target per match with an 8% conversion rate, while the visitors have only 2.62 shots on target away with 2% efficiency and fail to score in 81% of away games. Considering the superiority in quality of chances (xG), conversion and defensive stability, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast a 'No' for BTTS (70% vs 30%) because the away team hardly scores: 0.19 goals per match on the season and only 0.4 goals in the last 5 matches (2 goals total in 5). Although both teams’ xG are similar (home xG 1.12 vs away xG 1.09), the visitors show extreme inefficiency — conversion rate 2% versus 13% for the hosts — indicating a large gap between chances created and actual goals. Hosts concede 1.59 goals on average this season but have tightened up defensively in the last 5 matches, conceding only 0.6 on average (3 conceded in 5), so the likelihood of both teams scoring decreases. Additionally, seasonal BTTS figures diverge: hosts 65% BTTS vs away 19%, while the away form is 'lllll' with 12 goals conceded in the last 5, which strongly signals no goals from the visitors. Based on this, I pick 'No' as the best bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated expected goals are 1.48 for Abu Qair Semad and 0.79 for Raya Ghazl (total 2.27), computed as the average xG from the last 5 matches: xG_for_home 1.39 and xG_for_away 0.72, and xG_against_away 1.56 and xG_against_home 0.86. Season-long metrics confirm a tendency for higher scores from the home side – Abu Qair Semad registers Over 1.5 in 82% of their matches, while Raya only in 38% of fixtures. Additionally, Raya Ghazl scores on average 0.19 goals per game and has a shot conversion rate of just 2.0%, limiting their ability to convert xG into goals. With a combined lambda=2.27 the Poisson distribution estimates ~66% for Over 1.5, ~40% for Over 2.5 and ~20% for Over 3.5. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side "over"), since the high Over 1.5 rate for the home team (82%) and the calculated xG provide the greatest edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely: the home side have been level at the break in 53% of their matches, while the visitors have been level in 63% of their away games. After the interval the hosts show a clear offensive edge — they average 0.65 goals in the second half versus 0.13 for the visitors, and 94% of the hosts’ matches have featured at least one goal after the break (vs. 63% for the away side). I therefore expect a low-scoring first half, as the home team average 0.35 goals before the break and the visitors just 0.06, suggesting a 0:0 or 1:1 scoreline at half-time. Additionally, the visitors are out of form and poor in efficiency — they have no wins this season (winPercentage_away 0.0), have lost their last 5 matches (form 'lllll') and register a shot conversion rate of 2% versus 13% for the hosts. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is X/1 (draw at Half-Time, home win at Full-Time) due to the 53% half-time draw rate and the hosts’ markedly superior goal production after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Abu Qair Semad | Raya Ghazl | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 79% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad · 0.61 goals / game - Raya Ghazl
Abu Qair Semad is 87% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.76 goals / game - Abu Qair Semad · 1.42 goals / game - Raya Ghazl
Abu Qair Semad scores in 73% of games (24 of 33 meczów), while Raya Ghazl keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 meczów).
Raya Ghazl scores in 48% of games (16 of 33 meczów), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 45% (15 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
Over / Under - Raya Ghazl
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Abu Qair Semad is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Abu Qair Semad · 0.94 pts / game - Raya Ghazl
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Raya Ghazl - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Abu Qair Semad
Raya Ghazl
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Abu Qair Semad | Liga | Raya Ghazl | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.85 | 1.95 | • 2.03 |
| Both teams scored | • 42% | 41% | • 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 32% | ▲ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 38% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Abu Qair SemadGoalIslam Gaber
- Abu Qair SemadGoalAnas Shendy
- Abu Qair SemadGoalMahmoud Abdo Ahmed Lotfi
Head-to-head
Record from Abu Qair Semad's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Raya Ghazl. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs Raya Ghazl?
The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 4:0 Raya Ghazl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs Raya Ghazl?
Abu Qair Semad score 1.09 goals per game on average and Raya Ghazl 0.61. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 42% of Raya Ghazl's.
What form are Abu Qair Semad and Raya Ghazl in?
Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Raya Ghazl 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs Raya Ghazl?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


