Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Adama Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

Adama Kenema crest
Adama Kenema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
130%(2.90)
X40%(2.80)
230%(2.45)

Fasil Ketema displays impressive away form with an unbeaten run (0 away losses) and the league's best defensive record (just 0.2 goals conceded per away match). Adama Kenema holds a solid home record (50% win rate), though their attack is limited (0.67 goals per home match). A key factor is Fasil Ketema's advantage in xG metrics (1.49 vs 1.11) and significantly better defensive efficiency (80% clean sheets away). While form over the last five matches favors the visitors (1.8 PPG vs 1.6 PPG), Fasil Ketema's high away draw percentage (60%) and the defensive nature of both sides suggest a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

Adama Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Adama Kenema play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 3 January 2026 at 11:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Adama Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Adama Kenema scores 0.92 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Adama Kenema 42%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Adama Kenema 32%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.12. Adama Kenema: 6.4 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Adama Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Adama Kenema: 16-30 (8 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Fasil Ketema displays impressive away form with an unbeaten run (0 away losses) and the league's best defensive record (just 0.2 goals conceded per away match). Adama Kenema holds a solid home record (50% win rate), though their attack is limited (0.67 goals per home match). A key factor is Fasil Ketema's advantage in xG metrics (1.49 vs 1.11) and significantly better defensive efficiency (80% clean sheets away). While form over the last five matches favors the visitors (1.8 PPG vs 1.6 PPG), Fasil Ketema's high away draw percentage (60%) and the defensive nature of both sides suggest a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
6Shots7
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
4Shots on target1
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.84xG0.74
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
3Corners1
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
23Dangerous attacks31
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
7Fouls19
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0Cards0
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.92Goals scored / match0.74
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
1Goals conceded / match0.74
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
52%Average possession46%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
2.5Shots on target / match2.24
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.39Shots per match7.24
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
2.5Shots on target2.24
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
14.4%Shot conversion10.2%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
52%Possession46%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
1.12xG for1.14
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
1.1xG against1.1
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Adama Kenema: Efficient finishingFasil Ketema: Balanced
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)39%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Adama Kenema · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Adama Kenema
LWDLW
Season result split
26% W42% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-16-12
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Adama Kenema is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Adama Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Adama Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Adama Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Adama Kenema scores in 61% of matches (23 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Adama Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).

35Goals scored (season)28
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
38Goals conceded (season)28
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
1.92Average goals in match1.47
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal58%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
18%2 goals11%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
11%3 goals5%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
3%4 goals0%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal45%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
32%2 goals21%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
11%3 goals8%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time8%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
11%Scored in both halves8%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
40%BTTS - last 50%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Adama Kenema · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Adama Kenema - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.42
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.45
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
63%Clean sheet before half-time87%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
68%No goal before half-time71%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
61%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema
61%No goal after half-time63%
Adama KenemaFasil Ketema

Adama Kenema - second-half results

21% W50% R29% P
46
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Adama Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Adama Kenema
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
8
11
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+136%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Adama Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Adama KenemaLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.921.78 1.47
Both teams scored 42%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%28% 18%
Clean sheets 42%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 53%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Adama Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Adama Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Adama Kenema 0:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Adama Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

Adama Kenema score 0.92 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Adama Kenema's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Adama Kenema and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Adama Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Adama Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.