Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 19 July 2026

Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Adama Kenema crest
Adama Kenema
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl

Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Adama Kenema play Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 14 April 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Adama Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Adama Kenema scores 0.92 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Adama Kenema 42%, Mebrat Hayl 37%. Over 2.5: Adama Kenema 32%, Mebrat Hayl 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Adama Kenema: 6.4 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.0.

Match halves

Adama Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Adama Kenema: 16-30 (8 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mebrat Hayl holds a clear advantage in form and defense: they rank 6th versus Adama Kenema’s 10th and in the last 5 matches have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game) while the hosts have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (0.2 points per game). The gap in efficiency and defense is significant — Mebrat have scored 9 and conceded 4 in the last 5 (1.8 scored and 0.8 conceded per game), whereas Adama have scored 5 and conceded 10 (1.0 and 2.0 per game). Over the season the visitors have conceded 15 goals versus 26 for the hosts, with goal totals 20 (visitors) vs 24 (hosts), underlining Mebrat’s defensive edge. In terms of shot metrics the hosts register more on-target shots at home (2.85 vs 2.08) and similar xG (1.16 vs 1.18), but Adama’s poor recent form (10 goals conceded in 5 matches) makes the visitors look more stable. I therefore back an away win, although a draw remains realistic (Adama record 46% draws at home, and average goals are 1.77 for the hosts and 1.62 for the visitors).

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
8Shots11
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Shots on target4
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.33xG1.46
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
3Corners7
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
65Dangerous attacks67
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
-1Fouls-1
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
-1Cards-1
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.92Goals scored / match0.84
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1Goals conceded / match0.68
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
52%Average possession53%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.5Shots on target / match2.21
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.39Shots per match7
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.5Shots on target2.21
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
14.4%Shot conversion12%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
52%Possession53%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.12xG for1.12
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.1xG against1.16
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Adama Kenema: Efficient finishingMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Adama Kenema · 1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Adama Kenema
LWDLW
Season result split
26% W42% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-16-12
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Adama Kenema is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Adama Kenema · 0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Adama Kenema · 0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Adama Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Adama Kenema scores in 61% of matches (23 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Adama Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).

35Goals scored (season)32
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
38Goals conceded (season)26
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.92Average goals in match1.53
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal55%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
18%2 goals18%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
11%3 goals8%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
3%4 goals3%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal53%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
32%2 goals16%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
11%3 goals0%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time5%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
11%Scored in both halves11%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
40%BTTS - last 560%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mebrat Hayl is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Adama Kenema · 1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Adama Kenema - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.29
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.55
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
63%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
68%No goal before half-time74%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
61%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl
61%No goal after half-time61%
Adama KenemaMebrat Hayl

Adama Kenema - second-half results

21% W50% R29% P
46
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Adama Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Adama Kenema
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
8
11
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Adama Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Adama KenemaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.921.78 1.53
Both teams scored 42%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%28% 26%
Clean sheets 42%40% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%56% 39%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Adama Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Adama Kenema 0:1 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Adama Kenema score 0.92 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.84. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Adama Kenema's matches and 37% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Adama Kenema and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Adama Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Adama Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.