Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of November 02, 2026

AEP Polemidion vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

AEP Polemidion crest
AEP Polemidion
2 : 0half-time 1:0
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou

AEP Polemidion vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AEP Polemidion played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

AEP Polemidion has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

AEP Polemidion scores 0.20 goals per game and allows 2.00. MEAP Nisou scores 0.20 and allows 2.60. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of AEP Polemidion's games and 20% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 1.14 per game. AEP Polemidion takes 6.6 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 8.8.

First-half and second-half trends

AEP Polemidion leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

AEP Polemidion's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AEP Polemidion have a slight edge thanks to home advantage: they have won 1 of their 3 home matches, while MEAP Nisou have lost both away games. However, the hosts score just 0.33 goals per home match and have failed to find the net in 67% of those games, so a high-scoring performance from them is difficult to expect. Their opportunity lies in the visitors’ defense, which concedes an average of 3 goals away from home and allows opponents chances worth 1.79 xG, compared with 0.93 xG conceded by the hosts at home. MEAP create chances worth 1.54 xG away from home, against AEP’s 1.19 xG at home, but convert them into just 0.5 goals per match. Both teams have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, so the hosts’ advantage is limited and a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is the home side’s scoring record: they average 0.0 goals at home, have failed to score in 100% of these matches, and their home BTTS rate is 0%. In their last five matches, both teams averaged just 0.2 goals, while BTTS occurred in 0% of AEP matches and 20% of MEAP matches. The visitors’ poor away defense, conceding an average of 3.0 goals, gives the hosts a chance to break their scoring drought, especially with a home average of 0.92 xG. Even so, AEP manage only 2.0 shots on target per home match, and MEAP average 0.5 goals away from home, making it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to at least 2 goals: the 1.5 line was surpassed in 67% of AEP Polemidion matches and 100% of MEAP Nisou matches. Both defenses are vulnerable, conceding an average of 2.33 goals for the hosts and 3.00 for the visitors, keeping the prospect of goals alive despite both teams' poor finishing. MEAP create more chances, recording an xG of 1.54 compared with the hosts' 0.92 and averaging 4.5 shots on target versus 2.0. Caution is warranted on higher lines, however, as each team has averaged just 0.2 goals across their last 5 matches, while the 2.5 threshold was exceeded in 40% of both teams' games over that period. Therefore, Over 1.5 offers a clearer signal than backing a higher goal total, with a forecast of 2.60 goals overall.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In AEP’s home matches and MEAP’s away matches, both teams have averaged 0 goals before the break, making a draw at half-time more likely than either side taking the lead. The visitors’ greater chance creation supports an away win: their average away xG is 1.54, compared with AEP’s 0.92 at home, and they record 13 shots per match to the hosts’ 6. After the break, MEAP average 0.5 goals away from home, while AEP have scored none in that period at home. The X/2 pick nevertheless remains risky, as the visitors have lost 100% of their away matches so far and average only 0.5 goals scored per game.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
17Shots18
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
7Shots on target6
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.87xG1.96
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
5Corners8
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
43Dangerous attacks56
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0.2Goals scored / game0.2
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
2Goals allowed / game2.6
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
45%Average possession48%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.8Shots on target / game3
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.6Shots per game8.8
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.8Shots on target3
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
3%Shot conversion2.3%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
45%Possession48%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.14xG for1.17
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.37xG against1.79
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

AEP Polemidion: BalancedMEAP Nisou: Balanced
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)27%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.110.07

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AEP Polemidion is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - AEP Polemidion · 0.2 pts / game - MEAP Nisou

AEP Polemidion
WLLLL
Season result split
20% W0% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
MEAP Nisou
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AEP Polemidion is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - AEP Polemidion · 2.6 goals / game - MEAP Nisou

AEP Polemidion scoring profile: mixed

AEP Polemidion scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while AEP Polemidion keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

1Goals scored (season)1
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
10Goals conceded (season)13
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
2.2Average goals per game2.8
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1Goals scored (last 5)1
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

20%1 goal20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%2 goals0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%3 goals0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%4 goals0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
60%2 goals80%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
40%3 goals40%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
20%4 goals40%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%Scored in both halves0%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%BTTS - last 520%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AEP Polemidion - half-time state
0% leading20% draw80% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
0% leading20% draw80% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.2Points per game (1st half)0.2
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0Goals scored (1st half)0
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)1.6
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.6
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
20%Clean sheet before half-time20%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
100%No goal before half-time100%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.6
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
1Average goals (2nd half)1.2
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou
80%No goal after half-time80%
AEP PolemidionMEAP Nisou

AEP Polemidion - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.20
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

0% W60% D40% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.20
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.6

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

AEP Polemidion - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.00
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-6-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
MEAP Nisou - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.60
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.61.0
Average goals per game1.61.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-8-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AEP Polemidion
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
4
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
0
3
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
10%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
4%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
64%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AEP Polemidion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.94
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
15%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.81
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
14%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
191%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

AEP PolemidionLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals per game▼ 2.202.74• 2.80
Both teams scored▼ 0%50%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%52%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%30%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%71%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%76%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defensive advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of AEP Polemidion vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished AEP Polemidion 2:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AEP Polemidion vs MEAP Nisou?

AEP Polemidion score 0.20 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 0.20. The Second Division average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 0% of AEP Polemidion's matches and 20% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are AEP Polemidion and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games AEP Polemidion have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AEP Polemidion vs MEAP Nisou?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.