AFC Wimbledon vs Wigan Athletic: match statistics
AFC Wimbledon vs Wigan Athletic: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AFC Wimbledon played against Wigan Athletic in EFL League One (England). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
AFC Wimbledon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Wigan Athletic has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
AFC Wimbledon scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.33. Wigan Athletic scores 1.20 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of AFC Wimbledon's games and 53% of Wigan Athletic's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 33%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wigan Athletic has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.16 per game. AFC Wimbledon takes 10.3 shots per game, while Wigan Athletic takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
AFC Wimbledon leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Wigan Athletic leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
AFC Wimbledon's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Wigan Athletic, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AFC Wimbledon | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AFC Wimbledon is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon · 1.2 pts / game - Wigan Athletic
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AFC Wimbledon is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.27 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon · 1.2 goals / game - Wigan Athletic
Wigan Athletic is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon · 1.27 goals / game - Wigan Athletic
AFC Wimbledon scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while Wigan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
Wigan Athletic scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AFC Wimbledon
Over / Under - Wigan Athletic
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AFC Wimbledon is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon · 1.13 pts / game - Wigan Athletic
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AFC Wimbledon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Wigan Athletic - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AFC Wimbledon
Wigan Athletic
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| AFC Wimbledon | Liga | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.60 | 2.46 | • 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 46% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of AFC Wimbledon vs Wigan Athletic?
The EFL League One match finished AFC Wimbledon 1:2 Wigan Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AFC Wimbledon vs Wigan Athletic?
AFC Wimbledon score 1.27 goals per game on average and Wigan Athletic 1.20. The EFL League One average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 47% of AFC Wimbledon's matches and 53% of Wigan Athletic's.
What form are AFC Wimbledon and Wigan Athletic in?
Over the last 5 games AFC Wimbledon have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Wigan Athletic 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AFC Wimbledon vs Wigan Athletic?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.