Denmark - SuperligaData current as of October 30, 2026

AGF vs SønderjyskE: match statistics

AGF crest
AGF
2 : 1half-time 0:0
SønderjyskE crest
SønderjyskE

AGF vs SønderjyskE: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AGF played against SønderjyskE in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

AGF has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. SønderjyskE has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

AGF scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 1.00. SønderjyskE scores 1.41 and allows 1.48. Games in this league average 3.06 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 72% of AGF's games and 55% of SønderjyskE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 55%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

AGF has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.39 per game. AGF takes 15.9 shots per game, while SønderjyskE takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

AGF leads at halftime in 62% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. SønderjyskE leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

AGF's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). For SønderjyskE, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 3.06 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AGF are the match favorites: at home they win 57% of matches, keep a clean sheet in 50% of games and score on average 1.64 goals per match with an average xG of 2.19, totaling 52 goals this season. The hosts create significantly more chances — on average 18.57 shots and 6.36 on target at home versus SønderjyskE’s 11.79 shots and 3.93 on target away, with the visitors’ away xG at 1.34. Defensively the gap is clear: AGF concede on average 0.79 goals at home, while SønderjyskE concede 1.93 away and have conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches versus AGF’s 5 conceded in the same period. Additionally the visitors fail to score in 36% of away matches and have lower possession (45% vs 60%), which limits their chances of turning the game around. Based on this I assess the probability of a home win at about 65%, a draw 20% and an away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators favor both teams scoring: AGF has BTTS at 60%, SønderjyskE 50%, and the league average is 60%, which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. AGF averages 1.6 goals scored and concedes 1.07 per match, while SønderjyskE scores 1.21 and concedes 1.93; additionally SønderjyskE has conceded 2.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches (12 goals), increasing the chance for AGF to score. In the last 5 matches AGF had BTTS in 80% (4 of 5), and SønderjyskE in 40% (2 of 5), yet SønderjyskE scored 6 goals in those 5 matches (1.2 per match), so they have realistic potential to score away. xG and chance-creation stats also point to goals: AGF has xG_for 1.44 with 12.87 shots and 4.2 shots on target, and SønderjyskE xG_for 1.34 with 11.79 shots and 3.93 shots on target, suggesting both teams generate chances. In summary, combining seasonal BTTS 60%/50%, AGF’s high BTTS involvement in the last 5 matches (80%) and SønderjyskE’s defensive weakness (1.93 conceded on the season and 2.4 in the last 5), I pick BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of about 70% versus 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals were calculated as the average of the home attack and away defense: (xG_for_home 1.44 + xG_against_away 1.70)/2 = 1.57 for AGF and (xG_for_away 1.34 + xG_against_home 1.56)/2 = 1.45 for SønderjyskE, totaling 3.02. A Poisson model for the sum μ=3.02 yields probabilities of over 1.5 around 80%, over 2.5 around 58% and over 3.5 around 36%. Season data support this: AGF have 60% of home matches over 2.5, SønderjyskE 50% on the road, and the league average is 3.04 goals per game. Additionally, AGF score on average 1.6 goals from 12.87 shots with 12% conversion, while SønderjyskE average 1.21 goals from 11.79 shots with 10% conversion, and seasonal shares over 1.5 are 87% and 79% respectively, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

AGF hold a home advantage: they average 1.6 goals at home versus SønderjyskE’s 1.21 away, their xG is 1.44 against the visitors’ 1.34, and shot conversion is 12% vs 10%, which translates into 53% home wins (vs 21% away wins for visitors). At Half-Time draws predominate — AGF are level at the break in 53% of home matches, SønderjyskE in 43% of away games, giving roughly a 48% chance of a draw after 45 minutes; however the home side lead at the break in 27% of matches, while the visitors are trailing in 43% of their away fixtures, which together suggests ~35% probability of AGF leading at Half-Time. In the second half AGF score on average 0.93 and concede 0.6, whereas SønderjyskE score 0.79 and concede 1.07, so hosts more often produce a turnaround after the break and I estimate that a Half-Time draw has about a 55% chance to convert into an AGF win. On that basis the most likely HT/FT is draw/host win (X/1) at 27% probability, slightly behind is home lead and home win 1/1 (26%), with the remaining scenarios having lower single-digit percentage chances.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
AGFSønderjyskE
19Shots11
AGFSønderjyskE
8Shots on target7
AGFSønderjyskE
2.35xG1.43
AGFSønderjyskE
9Corners5
AGFSønderjyskE
81Dangerous attacks34
AGFSønderjyskE
9Fouls11
AGFSønderjyskE
2Cards0
AGFSønderjyskE

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.79Goals scored / game1.41
AGFSønderjyskE
1Goals allowed / game1.48
AGFSønderjyskE
53%Average possession45%
AGFSønderjyskE
5.62Shots on target / game4.07
AGFSønderjyskE

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.93Shots per game12.34
AGFSønderjyskE
5.62Shots on target4.07
AGFSønderjyskE
11.3%Shot conversion11.5%
AGFSønderjyskE
53%Possession45%
AGFSønderjyskE
1.85xG for1.39
AGFSønderjyskE
1.3xG against1.63
AGFSønderjyskE

Shooting quality

AGF: AttackingSønderjyskE: Balanced
AGFSønderjyskE
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AGF is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - AGF · 0.8 pts / game - SønderjyskE

AGF
WDLDD
Season result split
55% W34% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-10-3
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
SønderjyskE
DLLLW
Season result split
38% W28% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-10
1.41 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGF is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.79 goals / game - AGF · 1.41 goals / game - SønderjyskE

AGF is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - AGF · 1.48 goals / game - SønderjyskE

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 90% of games (26 of 29 games), while SønderjyskE keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 games).

SønderjyskE scoring profile: very strong

SønderjyskE scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 games), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 games).

52Goals scored (season)41
AGFSønderjyskE
29Goals conceded (season)43
AGFSønderjyskE
2.79Average goals per game2.9
AGFSønderjyskE
5Goals scored (last 5)6
AGFSønderjyskE
5Goals conceded (last 5)12
AGFSønderjyskE

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal76%
AGFSønderjyskE
52%2 goals52%
AGFSønderjyskE
21%3 goals14%
AGFSønderjyskE
10%4 goals0%
AGFSønderjyskE

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal72%
AGFSønderjyskE
21%2 goals45%
AGFSønderjyskE
7%3 goals10%
AGFSønderjyskE
0%4 goals7%
AGFSønderjyskE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
AGFSønderjyskE
0%BTTS in both halves7%
AGFSønderjyskE
24%Scored in both halves28%
AGFSønderjyskE

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
AGFSønderjyskE
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
AGFSønderjyskE
80%BTTS - last 540%
AGFSønderjyskE

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
AGFSønderjyskE
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
AGFSønderjyskE
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
AGFSønderjyskE

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
AGFSønderjyskE
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
AGFSønderjyskE
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
AGFSønderjyskE

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGF is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.14 pts / game - AGF · 1.1 pts / game - SønderjyskE

AGF - half-time state
62% leading28% draw10% trailing
SønderjyskE - half-time state
21% leading48% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.14Points per game (1st half)1.1
AGFSønderjyskE
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.55
AGFSønderjyskE
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
AGFSønderjyskE
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.21
AGFSønderjyskE
66%Clean sheet before half-time52%
AGFSønderjyskE
34%No goal before half-time59%
AGFSønderjyskE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per game (2nd half)1.48
AGFSønderjyskE
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
AGFSønderjyskE
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
AGFSønderjyskE
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.69
AGFSønderjyskE
55%Clean sheet after half-time52%
AGFSønderjyskE
52%No goal after half-time38%
AGFSønderjyskE

AGF - second-half results

41% W38% D21% L
62
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 55%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

SønderjyskE - second-half results

41% W24% D34% L
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
SønderjyskE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game1.01.4
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AGF
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
7
3
16-30
10
3
31-45
5
6
46-60
11
2
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

SønderjyskE
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
8
31-45
6
12
46-60
5
6
61-75
14
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

SønderjyskE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

AGFLigaSønderjyskE
Average goals per game▼ 2.793.06▼ 2.90
Both teams scored▲ 72%60%▼ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 52%60%▼ 55%
Clean sheets▲ 28%23%▲ 28%
Goal before half-time▲ 76%74%▼ 66%
Goal after half-time▼ 69%79%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.06
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Anders Bergholt PedersenOff: Simon Sylvest Wæver
  2. AGFYellow cardGift Links
  3. AGFSubstitutionOn: Nicolai PoulsenOff: Kevin Yakob
  4. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Tobias KlysnerOff: Andreas Oggesen
  5. SønderjyskEGoalOlti HyseniAssist: Anders Bergholt Pedersen
  6. SønderjyskESubstitutionOn: Pachanga Cassoma KristensenOff: Chidiebube Gideon Duru
  7. AGFAssistPatrick MortensenGoal: Maxime Henry Armand Soulas
  8. AGFYellow cardJames Bogere

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from AGF's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against SønderjyskE. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Sønderjysk Elitesport Fodbold
1 : 1
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
2 : 3
Sønderjysk Elitesport Fodbold
Sønderjysk Elitesport Fodbold
1 : 1
Aarhus Gymnastikforening

FAQ

What was the result of AGF vs SønderjyskE?

The Superliga match finished AGF 2:1 SønderjyskE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGF and SønderjyskE?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches AGF won 0, SønderjyskE won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGF vs SønderjyskE?

AGF score 1.79 goals per game on average and SønderjyskE 1.41. The Superliga average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 72% of AGF's matches and 55% of SønderjyskE's.

What form are AGF and SønderjyskE in?

Over the last 5 games AGF have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and SønderjyskE 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGF vs SønderjyskE?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.