AGF vs Viborg: match statistics
AGF, as the league leader, displays impressive form at their home stadium, winning 70% of home matches with only 10% ending in draws. The hosts average 1.7 goals per home match while boasting a high expected goals figure (xG 2.3), indicating the creation of numerous scoring opportunities. Viborg holds a balanced record of 40% wins and 40% losses in away games, but their average away xG (1.51) is significantly lower than AGF's defensive stability (xGA 1.05). A key factor is the disparity in quality of play – AGF dominates in possession (60% vs 49%) and shots taken (19.2 vs 12.9). While recent form is level for both teams (1.4 PPG), the hosts' advantage in direct home confrontations and the difference in class (goal difference of 9 vs 1) favor an AGF victory. Nevertheless, Viborg is capable of scoring away (1.2 goals on average), which could result in a competitive match, suggesting a moderate probability of a draw.
AGF vs Viborg: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AGF played against Viborg in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 5:2.
Recent form
AGF has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Viborg has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
AGF scores 1.95 goals per game and allows 1.00. Viborg scores 1.65 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of AGF's games and 60% of Viborg's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 65%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AGF has the higher season xG average, 1.92 to 1.37 per game. AGF takes 16.3 shots per game, while Viborg takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
AGF leads at halftime in 70% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. Viborg leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
AGF's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Viborg, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AGF, as the league leader, displays impressive form at their home stadium, winning 70% of home matches with only 10% ending in draws. The hosts average 1.7 goals per home match while boasting a high expected goals figure (xG 2.3), indicating the creation of numerous scoring opportunities. Viborg holds a balanced record of 40% wins and 40% losses in away games, but their average away xG (1.51) is significantly lower than AGF's defensive stability (xGA 1.05). A key factor is the disparity in quality of play – AGF dominates in possession (60% vs 49%) and shots taken (19.2 vs 12.9). While recent form is level for both teams (1.4 PPG), the hosts' advantage in direct home confrontations and the difference in class (goal difference of 9 vs 1) favor an AGF victory. Nevertheless, Viborg is capable of scoring away (1.2 goals on average), which could result in a competitive match, suggesting a moderate probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AGF | Viborg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AGF is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - AGF · 2.2 pts / game - Viborg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AGF is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
1.95 goals / game - AGF · 1.65 goals / game - Viborg
AGF is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - AGF · 1.45 goals / game - Viborg
AGF scores in 95% of games (19 of 20 meczów), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
Viborg scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AGF
Over / Under - Viborg
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.3 pts / game - AGF · 1.35 pts / game - Viborg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AGF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 70% of games and wins 65%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Viborg - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AGF
Viborg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| AGF | Liga | Viborg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.95 | 3.19 | • 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 60% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 23% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from AGF's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Viborg. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of AGF vs Viborg?
The Superliga match finished AGF 5:2 Viborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AGF vs Viborg?
AGF score 1.95 goals per game on average and Viborg 1.65. The Superliga average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 70% of AGF's matches and 60% of Viborg's.
What form are AGF and Viborg in?
Over the last 5 games AGF have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Viborg 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGF vs Viborg?
The statistical background for AGF vs Viborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.