Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueOKMK Sport MajmuasiData current as of October 15, 2026

AGMK vs Xorazm: match statistics

AGMK crest
AGMK
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Xorazm crest
Xorazm

AGMK vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AGMK played against Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on September 3, 2026. Venue: OKMK Sport Majmuasi. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

AGMK has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Xorazm has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

AGMK scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.32. Xorazm scores 0.89 and allows 1.47. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of AGMK's games and 47% of Xorazm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 42%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

AGMK has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.01 per game. AGMK takes 12.8 shots per game, while Xorazm takes 7.7.

First-half and second-half trends

AGMK leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.84 goals per game after halftime. Xorazm leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.47 after halftime.

When the teams score

AGMK's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Xorazm, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AGMK sit 6th, while Xorazm are only 13th, and the hosts have won 8 matches this season compared with the visitors’ 5 victories. At home, AGMK create significantly more chances, averaging 13.11 shots and an xG of 1.74, compared with Xorazm’s mere 6.1 shots and xG of 0.87 away from home. The visitors score just 0.70 goals per away match, have failed to find the net in 40% of such fixtures, and have lost 50% of their away games. Xorazm’s defense also allows opponents chances worth an average of 1.74 xG and concedes 1.50 goals per match, which further favors the hosts. Both teams have won only 1 of their last 5 matches, but AGMK boast stronger home numbers and should make the most of home advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate stands at 44% for AGMK and 50% for Xorazm, meaning that in neither case does it clearly exceed the scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Xorazm averages just 0.70 goals per match, has an xG of 0.87, and failed to score in 40% of their games, which significantly reduces the visitors’ chances of finding the net. AGMK are also not a team that scores consistently, having scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.8 per game, while BTTS landed in only 40% of those fixtures. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, whereas Xorazm have finished without scoring in as many as 40% of their appearances. Although the visitors’ defense has conceded an average of 2.2 goals recently, a result featuring goals only from AGMK is more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

AGMK average 1.11 goals, while Xorazm concede 1.50 away from home; however, the hosts have scored just 0.8 goals per match across their last five fixtures. The visitors have a season average of only 0.70 goals, although AGMK’s defense allows an average of 1.44 goals conceded. The hosts’ attacking potential has recently risen to 1.95 xG, while Xorazm allowed 1.92 xG over the same period, supporting a 2-3 goal scenario rather than a high-scoring game. The 3.5 line was not covered in 78% of AGMK matches and 80% of Xorazm fixtures, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Xorazm were level at the break in 60% of their matches, compared with 33% for AGMK, while averaging just 0.56 goals scored by the home side and 0.30 by the visitors in the first half. AGMK nevertheless have the clearer potential for a full-time win: they won 44% of their matches this season, compared with 10% for Xorazm, and their average xG stands at 1.17 versus 0.87 for the visitors. Xorazm’s defense allows opponents an average of 1.74 xG and concedes 1.50 goals per match, while AGMK average 9.44 shots compared with 6.10 for their opponents. After the break, the visitors lost 60% of their second-half segments, while the hosts averaged 1.33 points per match in those periods, supporting a scenario in which the game is decided after an evenly contested start. AGMK’s weaker recent form, with just 0.8 goals scored per match across their last five appearances, limits confidence in backing the hosts to lead at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
AGMKXorazm
16Shots7
AGMKXorazm
9Shots on target2
AGMKXorazm
2.03xG0.82
AGMKXorazm
8Corners5
AGMKXorazm
56Dangerous attacks33
AGMKXorazm
15Fouls9
AGMKXorazm
0Cards2
AGMKXorazm

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.42Goals scored / game0.89
AGMKXorazm
1.32Goals allowed / game1.47
AGMKXorazm
52%Average possession48%
AGMKXorazm
4.05Shots on target / game2.47
AGMKXorazm

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.79Shots per game7.68
AGMKXorazm
4.05Shots on target2.47
AGMKXorazm
11.1%Shot conversion11.6%
AGMKXorazm
52%Possession48%
AGMKXorazm
1.6xG for1.01
AGMKXorazm
1.34xG against1.61
AGMKXorazm

Shooting quality

AGMK: BalancedXorazm: Balanced
AGMKXorazm
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AGMK
LWLLD
Season result split
42% W26% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-6
1.53 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Xorazm
LWDLL
Season result split
26% W26% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-9
1.05 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGMK is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

1.42 goals / game - AGMK · 0.89 goals / game - Xorazm

AGMK is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.32 goals / game - AGMK · 1.47 goals / game - Xorazm

AGMK scoring profile: strong

AGMK scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 games), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 games).

Xorazm scoring profile: very strong

Xorazm scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 games), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 games).

27Goals scored (season)17
AGMKXorazm
25Goals conceded (season)28
AGMKXorazm
2.74Average goals per game2.37
AGMKXorazm
4Goals scored (last 5)6
AGMKXorazm
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
AGMKXorazm

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
AGMKXorazm
47%2 goals21%
AGMKXorazm
21%3 goals0%
AGMKXorazm
5%4 goals0%
AGMKXorazm

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal74%
AGMKXorazm
42%2 goals47%
AGMKXorazm
5%3 goals16%
AGMKXorazm
0%4 goals5%
AGMKXorazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
AGMKXorazm
0%BTTS in both halves5%
AGMKXorazm
16%Scored in both halves21%
AGMKXorazm

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
AGMKXorazm
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
AGMKXorazm
40%BTTS - last 560%
AGMKXorazm

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AGMKXorazm
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
AGMKXorazm
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AGMKXorazm

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
AGMKXorazm
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
AGMKXorazm
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
AGMKXorazm

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGMK - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Xorazm - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.11
AGMKXorazm
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.42
AGMKXorazm
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
AGMKXorazm
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.11
AGMKXorazm
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AGMKXorazm
63%No goal before half-time58%
AGMKXorazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per game (2nd half)1.05
AGMKXorazm
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
AGMKXorazm
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
AGMKXorazm
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.26
AGMKXorazm
37%Clean sheet after half-time37%
AGMKXorazm
53%No goal after half-time53%
AGMKXorazm

AGMK - second-half results

37% W26% D37% L
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Xorazm - second-half results

26% W26% D47% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGMK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.40
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Xorazm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Xorazm
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Xorazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AGMKLigaXorazm
Average goals per game▲ 2.742.59▼ 2.37
Both teams scored▲ 63%53%▼ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%51%▼ 42%
Clean sheets▼ 16%27%• 26%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%67%• 68%
Goal after half-time▲ 84%76%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. XorazmYellow cardRafael Sabino dos Santos
  2. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Maksim ShiryaevOff: Elzio Lohan Alves Lucio
  3. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Azizjon AkhrorovOff: Rustam Abdukhamidov
  4. XorazmYellow cardDiyorbek Ortiqboyev
  5. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Arihiro SentokuOff: Mirjamol Kosimov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from AGMK's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Xorazm. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Xorazm
1 : 0
AGMK
FK AGMK
3 : 1
Xorazm FK Urganch
Xorazm FK Urganch
0 : 1
FK AGMK

FAQ

What was the result of AGMK vs Xorazm?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished AGMK 1:0 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGMK and Xorazm?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches AGMK won 2, Xorazm won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGMK vs Xorazm?

AGMK score 1.42 goals per game on average and Xorazm 0.89. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of AGMK's matches and 47% of Xorazm's.

What form are AGMK and Xorazm in?

Over the last 5 games AGMK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Xorazm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGMK vs Xorazm?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AGMK vs Xorazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.