Argentina - Prim B NacionalData current as of 23 July 2026

Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán: match statistics

Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Agropecuario play San Martín Tucumán in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Agropecuario: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. San Martín Tucumán: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Agropecuario scores 0.71 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. San Martín Tucumán scores 0.90 and concedes 0.71. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Agropecuario 38%, San Martín Tucumán 29%. Over 2.5: Agropecuario 24%, San Martín Tucumán 14%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Agropecuario has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.26. Agropecuario: 10.6 shots per match, San Martín Tucumán: 9.9.

Match halves

Agropecuario: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.52. San Martín Tucumán: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Agropecuario: 76-90+ (6 goals). San Martín Tucumán: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Hosts Agropecuario have a season record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses; in the last 5 matches they scored only 2 goals, conceded 10 and average 0.2 points per game, indicating a clear drop in form. At home they average 14.2 shots (5.2 on target) and an xG of 1.73, but score only 1.0 goal per game and convert just 7% of attempts, with 40% of matches without a goal—generating many chances with poor finishing. San Martín Tucumán are unbeaten this season (3 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses); away they average 1.25 goals and only 0.5 conceded per game, 0% matches without a goal and 50% clean sheets, reflecting a stable defence. The visitors need fewer shots (9.25 per game, 4.75 on target) to be effective—their conversion rate is 14% with an away xG of 1.33—and they have 1.4 points per game in the last 5 fixtures. Considering hosts concede 1.4 goals at home versus 0.5 for the visitors and their poor finishing, I predict a win for the visitors.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
8Shots3
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
3Shots on target1
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.05xG0.61
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
2Corners2
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
45Dangerous attacks47
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
16Fouls23
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
4Cards4
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.71Goals scored / match0.9
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.19Goals conceded / match0.71
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
49%Average possession53%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
3.57Shots on target / match3.19
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.57Shots per match9.95
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
3.57Shots on target3.19
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
6.8%Shot conversion9.1%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
49%Possession53%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.27xG for1.26
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.31xG against1.01
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Shooting quality

Agropecuario: BalancedSan Martín Tucumán: Balanced
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
Accuracy (shots on target)34%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

San Martín Tucumán is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.6 pts / match - San Martín Tucumán

Agropecuario
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W38% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-9
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
San Martín Tucumán
LDWWD
Season result split
33% W43% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-5
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Martín Tucumán is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.9 goals / match - San Martín Tucumán

San Martín Tucumán is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.71 goals / match - San Martín Tucumán

Agropecuario scoring profile: mixed

Agropecuario scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while San Martín Tucumán keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

San Martín Tucumán scoring profile: mixed

San Martín Tucumán scores in 57% of matches (12 of 21 matches), while Agropecuario keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

15Goals scored (season)19
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
25Goals conceded (season)15
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.9Average goals in match1.62
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
2Goals scored (last 5)5
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal57%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
19%2 goals29%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
5%3 goals5%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0%4 goals0%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal52%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
43%2 goals19%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
5%3 goals0%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
5%4 goals0%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

29%
San Martín Tucumán - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 21 matches
39%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
14%Scored in both halves10%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
40%BTTS - last 520%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Martín Tucumán is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.33 pts / match - San Martín Tucumán

Agropecuario - half-time state
10% leading48% draw43% trailing
San Martín Tucumán - half-time state
29% leading48% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.33
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.19Goals scored (1st half)0.52
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.81Average goals (1st half)0.9
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
52%Clean sheet before half-time67%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
81%No goal before half-time62%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.29
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.71
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
62%Clean sheet after half-time71%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán
57%No goal after half-time71%
AgropecuarioSan Martín Tucumán

Agropecuario - second-half results

29% W38% R33% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding190%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Martín Tucumán - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Agropecuario - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
San Martín Tucumán - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Agropecuario
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

San Martín Tucumán
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Agropecuario

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

San Martín Tucumán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

AgropecuarioLigaSan Martín Tucumán
Average goals in match 1.901.89 1.62
Both teams scored 38%39% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%30% 14%
Clean sheets 33%39% 48%
Goal before half-time 57%56% 62%
Goal after half-time 67%70% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?

The Prim B Nacional match finished Agropecuario 2:0 San Martín Tucumán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?

Agropecuario score 0.71 goals per game on average and San Martín Tucumán 0.90. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Agropecuario's matches and 29% of San Martín Tucumán's.

What form are Agropecuario and San Martín Tucumán in?

Over the last 5 games Agropecuario have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and San Martín Tucumán 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.