Águila vs FAS: match statistics
Águila vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Águila played against FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Venue: Estadio Juan Francisco Barraza. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Águila has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. FAS has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Águila scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.10. FAS scores 2.08 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Águila's games and 53% of FAS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 51%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.46 per game. Águila takes 9.8 shots per game, while FAS takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Águila leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. FAS leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Águila's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (15 goals). For FAS, it is minutes 76-90+ (30 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict '2' — FAS win. Over the season FAS scored 106 goals versus Águila's 68 (a 38-goal differential) and has a superior away goal balance (+19 vs home +7), indicating an offensive edge for the visitors. FAS averages 1.92 goals away with a 19% conversion rate and 4.8 shots on target per match, while Águila at home averages 1.52 goals, 15% conversion and 4.42 shots on target; Águila's home xG is 1.56 versus FAS's 1.49 xG away, so chance creation will be similar but the visitors are more efficient. In the last five matches Águila has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 pts/match), FAS has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 pts/match); defensively FAS concedes slightly less (1.19 goals away vs Águila's 1.26 conceded at home) and has a higher clean sheet rate (27% vs 22%). Considering goals scored, efficiency (19% vs 15%) and a +19 away GD, I estimate probabilities: FAS 50%, draw 25%, Águila win 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because FAS scored 106 goals this season while Águila conceded 57, which strongly supports an away goal. Average xG shows 1.49 for FAS versus xG against hosts 1.08, so the visitors generate around 1.5 expected goals in this match. Águila average 2.24 goals per game (xG 1.58) against FAS’s average goals conceded 1.19, so the hosts also have realistic potential to score. Counterarguments are Águila’s 48% clean sheets and recent BTTS split over the last 5 matches: hosts 60% vs FAS 40%, but season-long metrics favor BTTS (FAS 58% and league average 54%). Considering the cumulative signals (xG 1.58 vs 1.49, 106 goals scored by FAS and only 27% clean sheets for FAS), I assess BTTS probability at about 65% versus 35% No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Águila scores on average 2.24 goals per home match, FAS as the away side averages 1.92; their xG are 1.58 (Águila) and 1.49 (FAS), indicating offensive potential for both teams. I calculated expected goals as the average of the attack xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: 1.47 for Águila ([1.58 + 1.35]/2) and 1.29 for FAS ([1.49 + 1.08]/2), totaling 2.76 expected goals. From a Poisson distribution with lambda=2.76 there is about a 76% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~52% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~30% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Season-long stats confirm this picture: Over 1.5 occurred in 80% of Águila’s matches and 88% of FAS’s matches, and in the last 5 meetings the teams scored 12 goals combined (Águila 7, FAS 5). Therefore I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: the high combined xG (2.76) and seasonal 80%/88% Over 1.5 rates provide the best probability and value.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Águila led at half-time in 15 matches this season (60%) and averages 1.12 goals by the break while conceding only 0.24, whereas FAS held a HT lead in 7 games (28%) and averages 0.76 goals by half-time. Over full matches the home side wins 80% of fixtures and averages 2.24 goals per game versus FAS’s 1.19 conceded, suggesting that a lead at the break often converts into a Full-Time victory. In the last 5 matches Águila scored 7 goals by half-time (1.4 per game) compared to FAS’s 2 goals (0.4 per game), confirming the strong first-half form of the hosts. Additionally, the home xG is 1.58 versus the away 1.49, and Águila registers more shots (12.24 vs 10.2) and shots on target (5.48 vs 4.8), with the home team keeping a half-time clean sheet in 80% of matches; therefore the strongest signal is 1/1 (lead at the break and win at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Águila | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Águila is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Águila · 1.6 pts / game - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 59% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Águila · 2.08 goals / game - FAS
FAS is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Águila · 0.94 goals / game - FAS
Águila scores in 77% of games (40 of 52 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 37% (19 of 51 games).
FAS scores in 88% of games (45 of 51 games), while Águila keeps a clean sheet in 35% (18 of 52 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Águila
Over / Under - FAS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / game - Águila · 1.71 pts / game - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Águila - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Águila
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Águila | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.40 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.02 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 54% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▲ 51% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FASGoalMiguel Ángel Murillo Valencia
- FASGoalJorge Antonio Cruz Cortez
- FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Águila's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against FAS. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Águila vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Águila 0:3 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Águila and FAS?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Águila won 1, FAS won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Águila vs FAS?
Águila score 1.31 goals per game on average and FAS 2.08. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Águila's matches and 53% of FAS's.
What form are Águila and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Águila have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FAS 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Águila vs FAS?
The statistical background for Águila vs FAS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.