Águila vs Firpo: match statistics
Águila vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Águila played against Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on May 13, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Águila has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Firpo has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Águila scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.10. Firpo scores 1.92 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Águila's games and 57% of Firpo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 53%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Firpo has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.46 per game. Águila takes 9.8 shots per game, while Firpo takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Águila leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Firpo leads at halftime in 35% and scores 1.27 after halftime.
When the teams score
Águila's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (14 goals). For Firpo, it is minutes 61-75 (26 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Águila). In the last 5 matches Águila have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (PPG 1.6), while Firpo went winless over the same period, posting 0-4-1 (PPG 0.8), indicating superior form for the hosts. Seasonally Firpo hold a clear attacking edge (94 goals vs 66 for Águila) and better shot conversion on the road (23% vs 15%), but xG is virtually level: 1.56 for Águila at home versus 1.55 for Firpo away. Additionally, Águila have conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 7 conceded by Firpo and record a higher home clean sheet rate (23% vs 17%), so I give the hosts a slight edge (45%/30%/25%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Firpo presents a very strong signal for BTTS - Yes: seasonal BTTS 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Águila has BTTS 40% for the season and 40% in the last 5. Firpo’s attack is distinctly effective: 2.29 goals per game on average, 94 goals this season, xG_for 1.55 and a high shot conversion rate of 23%, meaning the visitors frequently convert chances into goals. Águila has a strong home defense: only 0.8 goals conceded per game on average for the season, 48% clean sheets and 0.6 goals conceded on average in the last 5 matches, however their xG_for 1.92 and xG_against 1.15 show they also create and concede chances. Comparing xG and goals (Águila 66 scored and 55 conceded vs Firpo 94 scored and 51 conceded) and the league BTTS rate of 54% — which Firpo clearly exceeds — supports both teams scoring; at the same time Águila’s high clean sheet rate (48%) reduces certainty. Overall, weighting the strong away BTTS signal (75%/80%) against the home clean sheet factor, I assess BTTS - Yes at 65% and No at 35% as the most justified forecast.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and defensive data yield a combined expected goals total of 2.91: Águila 1.56 (attacking xG 1.92 vs opponent xG 1.20) and Firpo 1.35 (attacking xG 1.55 vs opponent xG 1.15). This 2.91 exceeds the league average of 2.68 and, under a Poisson distribution, translates to roughly a 79% probability for Over 1.5 goals, about 56% for Over 2.5 goals, and about 33% for Over 3.5 goals. Firpo averages 2.29 goals per game and has 71% of matches with over 2.5 goals, while Águila has 36% such matches; this increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Additionally, BTTS occurs in 40% of Águila’s matches and 75% of Firpo’s matches, indicating both teams score frequently and boosting the chances for Over 1.5/2.5. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (79%) at the 1.5 line; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (56%), and Over 3.5 has a lower probability (33%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Firpo's lead at the break: Firpo led at half-time in 12 matches (50%) versus Águila, who led only in 5 matches (20%), with half-time goals per game averaging 0.92 for Firpo and 0.40 for Águila. Additionally, Firpo scores more overall (2.29 on average) than Águila (1.56) and has higher finishing efficiency—shot conversion 23% versus the hosts’ 13%—which increases the likelihood they will maintain the lead. However, Águila generates more chances (xG 1.92 and 12.4 shots per game versus Firpo’s xG 1.55 and 10.17 shots), so there is a real risk the hosts will stage a turnaround or level the score after half-time. Second halves also produce many goals: Firpo averages 2.0 goals in second halves and Águila 1.6, and the proportion of matches with at least one goal after the break is 92% for Firpo and 80% for Águila, which supports Firpo keeping their advantage. As a result, the most likely scenario is 2/2 (30%), with alternatives X/2 (14%) and 2/X (15%) due to Águila’s ability to create advantages (hosts’ last 5 matches: 2 wins, 40%) and the high share of clean sheets for the hosts this season (48%), so I also assign some weight to draw variants.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Águila | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Águila is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Águila · 0.8 pts / game - Firpo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Firpo is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - Águila · 1.92 goals / game - Firpo
Firpo is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Águila · 1.04 goals / game - Firpo
Águila scores in 76% of games (38 of 50 meczów), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (16 of 49 meczów).
Firpo scores in 84% of games (41 of 49 meczów), while Águila keeps a clean sheet in 34% (17 of 50 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Águila
Over / Under - Firpo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Águila - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Firpo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Águila
Firpo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Águila | Liga | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.42 | 2.68 | ▲ 2.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 34% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FirpoGoalCristian David Gil Hurtado
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Águila's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Firpo. Games average 2.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Águila vs Firpo?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Águila 1:2 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Águila and Firpo?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Águila won 1, Firpo won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Águila vs Firpo?
Águila score 1.32 goals per game on average and Firpo 1.92. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Águila's matches and 57% of Firpo's.
What form are Águila and Firpo in?
Over the last 5 games Águila have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Firpo 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Águila vs Firpo?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Águila vs Firpo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


