Águila vs INCA-Aruba: match statistics
Águila vs INCA-Aruba: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Águila played against INCA-Aruba in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Estadio Juan Francisco Barraza. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Águila has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. INCA-Aruba has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Águila scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.44. INCA-Aruba scores 0.56 and allows 1.78. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Águila's games and 33% of INCA-Aruba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Águila has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.27 per game. Águila takes 10.4 shots per game, while INCA-Aruba takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Águila leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. INCA-Aruba leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
Águila's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For INCA-Aruba, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Águila have a clear home advantage: they average 2.25 goals per match, while INCA-Aruba score just 0.50 goals away from home. The hosts also create considerably more in the final third, averaging 12.25 shots and 5.25 shots on target, compared with 7.75 shots and 3.25 on target for the visitors. The difference is reflected in chance quality: Águila’s average home xG stands at 1.85, while INCA-Aruba’s away xG is 1.15, alongside an xG against figure as high as 2.08. The away side have lost 75% of their away matches and failed to score in 50% of them, significantly limiting their chances despite the hosts’ weaker recent run. Águila also concede an average of 2 goals at home and have yet to keep a clean sheet, making a scenario featuring a goal for the visitors alongside a home win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No pick is slightly better justified, as INCA-Aruba averages only 0.5 goals per season and 0.6 goals over their last 5 matches. The visitors failed to score in 50% of their games, while BTTS occurred in just 25% of their seasonal matches, well below the league average of 47%. Águila have improved their attack over the last 5 appearances, averaging 1.8 goals and 1.63 xG per match, while their opponents allow a high 2.06 xG, making a scenario in which the hosts score the most realistic outcome. At the same time, Águila kept a clean sheet in 25% of their matches, and INCA-Aruba’s poor 6% conversion rate limits the visitors’ chances of capitalizing on their opportunities. The hosts’ recent results, with BTTS at 80%, are an argument against this pick, but given the visitors’ clearly low attacking output, it remains more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams average just 0.5 goals per match this season, and neither has scored more than one goal in a single game in their season profile. Águila is clearly more dangerous in their last five appearances, scoring 1.8 goals per match with an xG of 1.63, while INCA-Aruba has managed only 0.6 goals and an xG of 1.04. Weak defenses, conceding an average of 2.0 goals each, increase the likelihood of at least two goals, as confirmed by 75% of matches involving both teams featuring a minimum of two goals. At the same time, only 25% of INCA-Aruba’s matches and 50% of Águila’s matches ended with at least four goals, while low shot-conversion rates of 5% and 6% limit the potential for a high-scoring game. Therefore, the safest betting angle is Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Águila win at full-time, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% for INCA-Aruba. During this period, the visitors averaged just 0.2 goals before the break and failed to score before half-time in 80% of their matches, clearly supporting a cautious, evenly matched start. After the break, Águila raises its average scoring output to 1.0 goal, while INCA-Aruba concedes an average of 1.2 goals. The hosts also have greater attacking potential over the full match: their xG stands at 1.33 versus the visitors’ 1.15, and they average 4.75 shots on target compared with 3.25 for INCA-Aruba. Risk remains significant, as both teams concede around 2.0 goals per match in the season data; however, Águila’s stronger recent attacking output—1.8 goals compared with INCA-Aruba’s 0.6—shifts the prediction toward a home win after a half-time draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Águila | INCA-Aruba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.15 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
INCA-Aruba is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Águila · 1.6 pts / game - INCA-Aruba
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Águila is 138% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Águila · 0.56 goals / game - INCA-Aruba
Águila is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.44 goals / game - Águila · 1.78 goals / game - INCA-Aruba
Águila scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).
INCA-Aruba scores in 56% of games (5 of 9 games), while Águila keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Águila
Over / Under - INCA-Aruba
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Águila is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Águila · 0.89 pts / game - INCA-Aruba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Águila - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
INCA-Aruba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Águila
INCA-Aruba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Águila | Liga | INCA-Aruba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.78 | 2.51 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 33% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 59% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ÁguilaGoalCarlos René Garay Velásquez
- INCA-ArubaGoalBryan Manrique Paz Ayala
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Águila vs INCA-Aruba?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Águila 3:1 INCA-Aruba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Águila vs INCA-Aruba?
Águila score 1.33 goals per game on average and INCA-Aruba 0.56. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Águila's matches and 33% of INCA-Aruba's.
What form are Águila and INCA-Aruba in?
Over the last 5 games Águila have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and INCA-Aruba 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Águila vs INCA-Aruba?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


