Ajman vs Al Nasr: match statistics
Ajman vs Al Nasr: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ajman played against Al Nasr in Arabian Gulf League (United Arab Emirates). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Ajman has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Nasr has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Ajman scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.28. Al Nasr scores 1.36 and allows 1.28. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Ajman's games and 68% of Al Nasr's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 48%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.33 per game. Ajman takes 12.4 shots per game, while Al Nasr takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Ajman leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Al Nasr leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ajman's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Al Nasr, it is minutes 0-15 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Arabian Gulf League games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Nasr appears to be the favorite: they have 34 goals this season versus Ajman’s 25 and have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Ajman’s 5, translating to an average of 2.0 points per match in the last five versus Ajman’s 1.4. Although Ajman generates slightly more chances (average xG 1.37 vs 1.28 for Al Nasr and 12.5 shots with 4.08 on target per match vs 11.33 and 3.5), their efficiency is lower — conversion around 7% versus 11% for the visitors and only 0.92 goals per home match. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: Al Nasr concedes an average of 1.08 goals away, while Ajman concedes 1.42 at home, and clean sheet percentage is 33% vs 17% for the hosts. Ajman fail to score in 33% of home games, whereas Al Nasr finish goalless in only 17% of away matches, and the possession difference (50% vs 54%) does not offset Ajman’s finishing issues. Considering the 34:25 total goals, better conversion rate (11% vs 7%), higher average points in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.4) and higher away win rate (42% vs the hosts’ 25% at home), I tip an Al Nasr victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Ajman 69% and Al Nasr 67%, both above the league level of 55%, indicating Goal/Goal is a frequent outcome. Seasonal figures confirm offensive and defensive vulnerability — Ajman scored 25 and conceded 32, Al Nasr scored 34 and conceded 32; goals per game averages are 1.46 (Ajman) and 1.25 (Al Nasr), with conceded averages 1.46 and 1.08. In the last 5 matches the picture favors the visitors: Al Nasr has BTTS at 80% and scores 1.8 on average, while Ajman has 40% and 1.0 goals, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides mainly due to Al Nasr’s form. Additionally, xG indicators show both teams create chances — Ajman xG 1.37 vs Al Nasr 1.28, and xG against 1.54 vs 1.37; shots on target 3.92 vs 3.5, and shot conversion 12% vs 11%. Considering seasonal BTTS 69%/67%, Al Nasr’s strong recent form and Ajman’s low clean sheet rate (15% vs 33%), I select BTTS - Yes as the more probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics indicate a clear goals trend: Ajman averages 1.46 goals scored and records Over 1.5 in 85% of matches, Al Nasr averages 1.25 goals and has Over 1.5 in 67% of games, yielding a historical average of about 76% for Over 1.5. xG supports this picture — Ajman xG is 1.37, xG conceded by Al Nasr is 1.37 (estimate ~1.37 for the home side), while Al Nasr xG is 1.28 with xG conceded to Ajman 1.54 giving ~1.41 for the away side; averaging seasonal estimates and xG produces a forecast of 1.32 (Ajman) vs 1.38 (Al Nasr), i.e. a total of 2.70 goals. Additionally, Al Nasr have scored an average of 1.8 goals in their last 5 matches versus Ajman’s 1.0, and BTTS rates of 69%/67% increase the likelihood of both teams scoring. As a result the strongest market signal is Over 1.5 (large historical edge ~76% and projected 2.70 goals); Over 2.5 is only slightly favored (~52%), and Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time draw with an Al Nasr victory at Full-Time (X/2). Al Nasr were level at the break in 58% of matches, and Ajman had a Half-Time draw in 60% of their last 5 games, which provides a strong signal for a draw at the break. In the second half the visitors show the edge — in their last 5 matches Al Nasr won 60% of games and averaged 1.2 goals after the break, while Ajman average 0.8 goals after the break and 1.4 points in the second half. Seasonal numbers also favor Al Nasr: away points per game 1.58 versus 1.38 for the home side, and a higher win rate of 42% vs 31%. Additionally both teams score frequently (BTTS 69% for Ajman and 67% for Al Nasr), so a Half-Time draw followed by a turnaround to a visitors’ win (e.g. 1:1 → 1:2) appears the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ajman | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Nasr is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ajman · 2 pts / game - Al Nasr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nasr is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Ajman · 1.36 goals / game - Al Nasr
Ajman scores in 60% of games (15 of 25 meczów), while Al Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 meczów).
Al Nasr scores in 84% of games (21 of 25 meczów), while Ajman keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ajman
Over / Under - Al Nasr
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nasr is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.76 pts / game - Ajman · 1.44 pts / game - Al Nasr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ajman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Nasr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ajman
Al Nasr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Arabian Gulf League).
Teams vs league
| Ajman | Liga | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.28 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 55% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 51% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 25% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ajman's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Al Nasr. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ajman vs Al Nasr?
The Arabian Gulf League match finished Ajman 2:2 Al Nasr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ajman and Al Nasr?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ajman won 1, Al Nasr won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ajman vs Al Nasr?
Ajman score 1.00 goals per game on average and Al Nasr 1.36. The Arabian Gulf League average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Ajman's matches and 68% of Al Nasr's.
What form are Ajman and Al Nasr in?
Over the last 5 games Ajman have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Nasr 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ajman vs Al Nasr?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


