Akritas vs AEL: match statistics
Akritas vs AEL: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Akritas played against AEL in First Division (Cyprus). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Akritas has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. AEL has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Akritas scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 1.75. AEL scores 1.22 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Akritas's games and 44% of AEL's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 53%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AEL has the higher season xG average, 1.18 to 1.06 per game. Akritas takes 8.3 shots per game, while AEL takes 8.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Akritas leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. AEL leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Akritas's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For AEL, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Akritas clearly has better short-term form: 3 wins in the last 5 matches (form lwwwl) and an average of 1.8 points per game, while AEL has won only 1 of 5 and averages 0.8 points per game. Seasonally AEL looks stronger offensively (8th with 39 goals scored vs 12th and 30 goals for Akritas) and is more efficient (15% conversion vs 8% for the hosts). Akritas attempts more shots at home (9 per game vs 7.33 for AEL away) and has a similar xG (1.09 vs 1.05), but misses more often; AEL registers more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.53). Defensively recent data favors Akritas: the hosts conceded 5 goals in the last 5 matches, while AEL conceded as many as 9, despite AEL having allowed fewer goals over the season (45 vs 56). Considering the home-side form advantage and AEL’s weaker defensive spell, I predict an Akritas win, but with a moderate margin given the visitors’ seasonal efficiency.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Indicators from the last 5 matches strongly support BTTS: AEL has BTTS at 80% (4 of 5) and conceded 9 goals in those games (1.8 per match), while Akritas has BTTS 40% (2 of 5) and conceded 5 goals (1.0 per match). On the season level Akritas records 53% of matches with both teams scoring versus 33% for AEL, and goals averages are 1.35 scored and 1.35 conceded for Akritas and 1.07 scored and 1.47 conceded for AEL, indicating both teams tend to both score and concede. Recent xG are 1.31 for Akritas and 1.32 for AEL, with xG against at 1.25 for both, and Akritas averages 10.35 shots (3.29 on target) versus AEL 7.33 (3.27 on target), confirming chance creation at both ends. Although AEL has a higher season clean sheet rate (33% vs 18% Akritas), the high number of goals conceded by AEL in the last 5 (9) and the league average of 2.6 goals per match increase the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Considering the above I assign 68% probability to BTTS and 32% to No BTTS, therefore I recommend the 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis favors more goals: Akritas averages 1.35 goals per match, AEL 1.07, and projected xG is 1.40 for the home side and 1.08 for the visitors (2.48 xG total). Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: Akritas 76% and AEL 80% (average 78%), which together with the combined xG strongly supports Over 1.5. The chance for Over 2.5 is moderate — both sides have 53% of matches over 2.5, while the league is 47%, so my probability for Over 2.5 is about 53%. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: Akritas 29% and AEL 20% of seasonal matches over 3.5 gives roughly a 25% probability. The best pick is Over 1.5 due to the combined xG of 2.48, the high rate of matches >1.5 (avg. 78%), and the fact that 100% of Akritas matches and 93% of AEL matches have had at least 1 goal this season.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time data clearly favor AEL: the visitors led at the break in 40% of matches, while Akritas did so in only 18%, and the home side were behind at half-time in 59% of games, indicating AEL’s advantage in the first half. Despite this, Akritas shows strong second-half metrics: they average 1.00 goal after the break and obtain 1.59 points in second halves, whereas AEL scores only 0.53 goals and collects 1.27 points in second halves. The difference in chance quality and defensive performance also favors the hosts after the interval – Akritas’ second-half xG is 1.29 versus AEL’s 1.05, and AEL concedes on average 1.00 goal after the break compared to 0.65 conceded by Akritas, which facilitates comebacks. Additionally, in the last five matches Akritas have won 60% of games while AEL only 20%, confirming the hosts’ superior short-term form. As a result, the strongest signal is AEL leading at half-time with Akritas winning the match (HT/FT 2/1) — I assign this scenario 33%, 2/X 20%, and distribute the remaining outcomes as less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Akritas | AEL | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Akritas is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Akritas · 1.4 pts / game - AEL
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AEL is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Akritas · 1.22 goals / game - AEL
AEL is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.75 goals / game - Akritas · 1.41 goals / game - AEL
Akritas scores in 59% of games (19 of 32 meczów), while AEL keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).
AEL scores in 66% of games (21 of 32 meczów), while Akritas keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Akritas
Over / Under - AEL
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Akritas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AEL - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Akritas
AEL
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Akritas | Liga | AEL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.69 | 2.60 | • 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 43% | • 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 73% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Akritas's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against AEL. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Akritas vs AEL?
The First Division match finished Akritas 1:2 AEL. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Akritas and AEL?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Akritas won 1, AEL won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Akritas vs AEL?
Akritas score 0.94 goals per game on average and AEL 1.22. The First Division average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Akritas's matches and 44% of AEL's.
What form are Akritas and AEL in?
Over the last 5 games Akritas have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and AEL 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Akritas vs AEL?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Akritas vs AEL: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


