Al Adalh vs Al Anwar: match statistics
Al Adalh vs Al Anwar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Adalh played against Al Anwar in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Al Adalh has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Anwar has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Adalh scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 2.23. Al Anwar scores 1.52 and allows 1.52. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 77% of Al Adalh's games and 71% of Al Anwar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 52%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Anwar has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.18 per game. Al Adalh takes 10.1 shots per game, while Al Anwar takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Adalh leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Al Anwar leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.84 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Adalh's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Al Anwar, it is minutes 76-90+ (19 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X). Al Adalh have a very weak home defense — conceding 2.33 goals per home game and already shipping 69 goals this season with 0% clean sheets, whereas Al Anwar concede only 1.47 goals per away match and have a 13% clean sheet rate. The visitors also display a strong draw trend: 60% of their away games end in draws, and the hosts draw 40% of their home matches, which increases the probability of a shared point. In attack the hosts average 11.2 shots and 3.67 shots on target per game, scoring 1.33 goals at home with an xG of 1.31, while Al Anwar average 9.07 shots per match and 1.13 goals with an xG of 1.09, so the home advantage in chance creation is marginal. In the last 5 matches Al Adalh have scored 7 and conceded 11, while Al Anwar have scored 12 and conceded 9, both averaging 1.4 points in that period, which overall leads to assessing a draw as the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - Yes is that seasonal rates show 63% (Al Adalh) and 80% (Al Anwar) for BTTS, while the league average is 63%. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS in 100% — Al Adalh in those 5 matches averaged 1.4 scored and 2.2 conceded, and Al Anwar averaged 2.4 scored and 1.8 conceded, meaning 5/5 fixtures saw goals from both sides. Additionally xG indicates Al Adalh has xG 1.49 versus 1.09 for Al Anwar, with xG against 1.22 and 1.39 — both teams create chances while also allowing opponent opportunities; average shots on target are 4.81 vs 3.27. The probability of a clean sheet is low: clean sheet percentages are 19% for the home side and 13% for the away side, and seasonal average goals conceded are 1.56 and 1.47, which further supports goals from both teams. Considering the 63%/80% BTTS, 100% in the last 5 matches and low 19%/13% clean sheets, I predict BTTS 'Yes' with a probability of 80% versus 20% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the Over 1.5 line: Al Adalh have 88% of matches with over 1.5 goals and Al Anwar 93%, averaging 90.5%, which indicates a very high probability of at least two goals. The xG model yields an expected 1.44 goals for the home side (xG attack 1.49 vs opponent defense 1.39) and 1.16 for the away side (xG attack 1.09 vs home defense 1.22), total ≈2.60 goals. Poisson with λ=2.60 gives about a 48% chance of at least 3 goals (1 − P(0..2) ≈0.48), however seasonal Over 2.5 rates (69% for home, 33% for away → average 51%) and form from the last 5 matches (80% and 100% → average 90%) weighted (0.4/0.4/0.2) raise my assessment for Over 2.5 to ≈58%. For Over 3.5 Poisson gives ≈26.5%, and seasonal figures are 44%/27% (average 35.5%), so I cautiously price Over 3.5 at ≈34%. Given very strong Over 1.5 indicators (88% and 93%), high BTTS 63%/80% and expected 2.60 goals, I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest opportunity.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the first half the visitors hold the advantage — Al Anwar led at the break in 33% of matches versus 25% for Al Adalh, and the hosts conceded as many as 8 goals in minutes 0–15 while Al Anwar conceded only 1, suggesting a risk of an early lead for the visitors. After the break the situation reverses: Al Adalh averages 1.19 goals in second halves, records 50% wins in second halves and averages 1.81 points in second halves, so they frequently stage a comeback. This is corroborated by 14 goals scored by the hosts in minutes 76–90 versus 5 such goals for the visitors, indicating their strength in the closing stages. Over the full match Al Adalh has 1.88 goals scored and 1.56 conceded, while Al Anwar has 1.13 scored and 1.47 conceded, giving the hosts the edge over 90 minutes. Matching the 33% rate of visitors leading at the break with the hosts’ 50% second-half win rate provides the strongest signal for the scenario that Al Anwar will lead at half-time and Al Adalh will mount a turnaround to win (2/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Adalh | Al Anwar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Anwar is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Al Adalh · 1.52 goals / game - Al Anwar
Al Anwar is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.23 goals / game - Al Adalh · 1.52 goals / game - Al Anwar
Al Adalh scores in 84% of games (26 of 31 meczów), while Al Anwar keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 meczów).
Al Anwar scores in 84% of games (26 of 31 meczów), while Al Adalh keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Adalh
Over / Under - Al Anwar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Anwar is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / game - Al Adalh · 1.23 pts / game - Al Anwar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Adalh - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 16%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Anwar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Adalh
Al Anwar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Adalh | Liga | Al Anwar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.48 | 2.94 | • 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 60% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 21% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 76% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al AdalhSubstitutionOn: Abdulaziz Mohasen Aljamman AldossaryOff: Rashed bin Abdulrahman bin Mubarak Al Salem
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Adalh's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Anwar. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
The First Division match finished Al Adalh 2:1 Al Anwar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
Al Adalh score 1.26 goals per game on average and Al Anwar 1.52. The First Division average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Al Adalh's matches and 71% of Al Anwar's.
What form are Al Adalh and Al Anwar in?
Over the last 5 games Al Adalh have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Anwar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
The statistical background for Al Adalh vs Al Anwar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


