Al Arabi vs Al Nasar: match statistics
Al Arabi vs Al Nasar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Arabi play Al Nasar in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 30 May 2026 at 18:20. Venue: Al-Sadaqua Walsalam Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Al Arabi: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Al Nasar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Arabi scores 1.65 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. Al Nasar scores 1.05 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Arabi 39%, Al Nasar 55%. Over 2.5: Al Arabi 39%, Al Nasar 41%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Al Arabi has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.36. Al Arabi: 12.0 shots per match, Al Nasar: 9.1.
Match halves
Al Arabi: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Nasar: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Al Arabi: 46-60 (10 goals). Al Nasar: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kuwait Premier League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Arabi are favorites at home: in home matches they sit 3rd with 43% wins and 43% draws and only 14% losses. The hosts score on average 1.71 goals per home match (avg xG 1.60) and concede just 0.71, while Al Nasar away average 0.88 goals per match (xG 1.24) and concede 1.38. Al Arabi create significantly more opportunities — 13.43 shots per match with 4.71 on target (conversion 13%) versus the visitors' 8.13 shots and 3.5 on target (conversion 11%), translating into higher quality chances. Although Al Nasar have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches and average 2.0 points per match in that period, they conceded 8 goals in those five games, and failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures. Considering the higher xG, superior shot metrics and the hosts’ more stable defense (29% clean sheets vs 13% for the visitors), I expect an Al Arabi victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Arabi | Al Nasar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Arabi is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Al Arabi · 1 pts / match - Al Nasar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Arabi is 57% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Al Arabi · 1.05 goals / match - Al Nasar
Al Arabi is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.65 goals / match - Al Arabi · 1.27 goals / match - Al Nasar
Al Arabi scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Al Nasar keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
Al Nasar scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Al Arabi keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Arabi
Over / Under — Al Nasar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Arabi is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Al Arabi · 1.09 pts / match - Al Nasar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Arabi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Nasar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Arabi
Al Nasar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Arabi | Liga | Al Nasar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 47% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 30% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 70% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Arabi 1 - 0 - 0 Al Nasar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Arabi vs Al Nasar?
The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Arabi 2:1 Al Nasar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Arabi vs Al Nasar?
Al Arabi score 1.65 goals per game on average and Al Nasar 1.05. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Al Arabi's matches and 55% of Al Nasar's.
What form are Al Arabi and Al Nasar in?
Over the last 5 games Al Arabi have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Al Nasar 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Arabi vs Al Nasar?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Arabi vs Al Nasar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.