Al Hazm vs Al Hilal: match statistics
Al Hazm vs Al Hilal: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Hazm played against Al Hilal in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Al Hazm has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Al Hilal has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Hazm scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.67. Al Hilal scores 2.62 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 3.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Al Hazm's games and 55% of Al Hilal's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 62%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Hilal has the higher season xG average, 1.98 to 1.32 per game. Al Hazm takes 11.5 shots per game, while Al Hilal takes 16.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Hazm leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Al Hilal leads at halftime in 66% and scores 1.34 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Hazm's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Al Hilal, it is minutes 31-45+ (21 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.01 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Hilal is the clear favorite: they have 21 wins and 0 losses this season and 76 goals scored versus Al Hazm's 10 wins and 34 goals. Away, Al Hilal averages 2.85 goals per game with an average xG of 1.97 and a shot conversion rate around 17%, while Al Hazm at home averages 1.33 goals per game, xG 1.44 and conversion around 10%. The visitors create more chances (16.85 shots and 7.08 on target per game with 58% possession) versus the hosts' 12.87 shots, 4.2 on target and 48% possession. Defensively Al Hazm concedes 1.8 goals per home game, while Al Hilal concedes only 1.08 away and has 38% clean sheets versus Hazm's 13%; additionally Al Hilal have had no away games without scoring (0% scoreless matches), whereas Hazm had such matches in 27% of home fixtures. Although Hazm have a better last-5 form in points (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss and 2.0 pts per game) versus Al Hilal (2 wins, 3 draws and 1.8 pts), the superiority in chance quality and finishing favors an away win for Al Hilal.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project a 66% probability for BTTS - Yes (34% against), driven by dominant offensive signals in the data. Al Hazm posts a seasonal goals average of 2.44 with xG 1.99 and has scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match), while Al Hilal averages 2.85 goals seasonally with xG 1.97 and 13 goals in the last 5 (2.6 per match), indicating a genuine threat to both goals. Defensively, Al Hazm concedes 0.69 goals per match on average (0.8 in the last 5) with xG against 0.79, and Al Hilal concedes 1.08 (1.2 in the last 5) with xG against 1.13, so both teams are allowing chances. Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for the home side and 62% for the away side, and the league BTTS stands at 59% with an average goals of 3.01; additionally, the last 5 matches for both teams show BTTS at 60%, reinforcing the both-teams-to-score scenario. At the same time, Al Hazm’s high clean sheet rate of 50% (season) moderates the risk, so I price BTTS at 66% rather than an extreme figure.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a high probability of goals: Al Hazm at home scores on average 2.44 goals with xG 1.99, while Al Hilal away scores on average 2.85 with xG 1.97. The mean of the attackers' xG and the opponents' defensive xG yields a projected 1.56 goals for the home side and 1.38 for the visitors, totaling 2.94 goals. With an expected total of 2.94 goals the probability of at least 3 goals is around 56%, and the seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 63% (Al Hazm) and 62% (Al Hilal), so I estimate Over 2.5 at 61%. The strongest signal, however, is Over 1.5: seasonally 81% for the home team and 92% for the away team, and a league average of 3.01 goals makes me rate Over 1.5 at 92%, therefore I choose Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonally Al Hazm led at half-time in 12 matches (75%), while Al Hilal led at half-time in 7 fixtures (54%), indicating a home advantage in the first 45 minutes. Additionally, Al Hazm has superior defensive metrics: average xG against 0.79 versus Al Hilal’s 1.13 and average goals conceded by half-time 0.31 vs 0.54, so the hosts are less likely to concede before the break. Over the full match the hosts also have a slight edge – seasonal points 2.50 versus 2.38, clean sheet rate 50% vs 38% and half-time goal difference +16 vs +9 – which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Although in the last 5 matches Al Hilal led at half-time in 4 of 5 cases (80%) and have a higher BTTS rate 62% vs 50%, the overall xG and HT lead figures favor Al Hazm, especially at their stadium. As a result I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 (home/home) scenario (39%), with moderate chances for a draw or a turnaround in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hazm | Al Hilal | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Hilal is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Al Hazm · 2.6 pts / game - Al Hilal
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hilal is 132% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Al Hazm · 2.62 goals / game - Al Hilal
Al Hilal is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Al Hazm · 0.86 goals / game - Al Hilal
Al Hazm scores in 67% of games (20 of 30 meczów), while Al Hilal keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 meczów).
Al Hilal scores in 97% of games (28 of 29 meczów), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hazm
Over / Under - Al Hilal
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hilal is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Al Hazm · 2.21 pts / game - Al Hilal
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Hilal - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 66% of games and wins 72%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (21 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Hazm
Al Hilal
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hazm | Liga | Al Hilal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.80 | 3.01 | ▲ 3.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 23% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 75% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 81% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Hazm's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Hilal. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Hilal?
The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 0:3 Al Hilal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Hilal?
Al Hazm score 1.13 goals per game on average and Al Hilal 2.62. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Al Hazm's matches and 55% of Al Hilal's.
What form are Al Hazm and Al Hilal in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Al Hilal 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Hilal?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


