Al Hazm vs Al Shabab: match statistics
Al Hazm vs Al Shabab: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Hazm played against Al Shabab in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Al Hazm has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Al Shabab has 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 0.67 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Hazm scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.67. Al Shabab scores 1.33 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Al Hazm's games and 67% of Al Shabab's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Shabab has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 0.91 per game. Al Hazm takes 7.0 shots per game, while Al Shabab takes 16.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Hazm leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Al Shabab leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Hazm's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Al Shabab, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Hazm have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals during that period, while Al Shabab have failed to win and have scored just 6 goals. However, the hosts’ home advantage is undermined by their home record: they lost their only match so far, failed to score, and recorded an average xG of just 0.94. Al Shabab remain unbeaten away from home after a 0:0 draw, kept a clean sheet, and created chances worth an average of 1.81 xG, with 15 shots and 5 shots on target per match. The visitors therefore have a clear edge in the quality of chances created, but their run of 3 defeats and 2 draws, along with 10 goals conceded in their last five matches, limits their chances of winning. A closely contested draw appears the most likely outcome, although both teams should have opportunities to end their poor finishing streaks.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both sides to score is primarily based on their recent form: BTTS occurred in 60% of the five previous matches involving Al Hazm and Al Shabab. Al Hazm averaged 1.8 goals scored during this period, while Al Shabab conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, clearly increasing the hosts’ chances of finding the net. Despite their poorer results, the visitors created chances worth an average xG of 1.77, while the Al Hazm defense allowed opponents an xG of 1.43 and conceded 7 goals in five matches. Both teams also record a high number of shots on target in the season data—5.5 and 5.0 per match, respectively—so their attacking potential is not incidental. Al Shabab’s away statistics, based on a very small sample, suggest that they may fail to score, but the broader data from the last five matches more strongly supports a scenario in which each side scores at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Al Hazm’s last five matches produced an average of 3.2 goals, while Al Shabab’s games averaged as many as 3.2 goals, with both teams recording over 2.5 goals in 60% of those matches. The home side scored 1.8 goals per game during this period, while the visitors conceded 2.0, which supports the expectation of at least one or two Al Hazm goals. Al Shabab create chances worth an average of 1.77 xG, while Al Hazm allow opponents 1.43 xG, meaning the away side also has realistic scoring potential. The projected total of 3.00 goals clearly supports Over 1.5; the line requires only two goals and is significantly safer than the more balanced Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest HT/FT option is a draw at half-time followed by an Al Hazm win, as Al Shabab were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and never led at half-time. Al Hazm, however, have a clearly stronger current run of form: they collected 9 points from their last 5 matches, won 3 times and averaged 1.8 goals per game, while Al Shabab failed to win any of their matches and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. The hosts held a lead at the break in 40% of their last five appearances, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in 40% of theirs; however, Al Shabab’s high rate of early draws further strengthens the X/1 scenario. After the break, Al Hazm score an average of 0.8 goals, while their opponents score 0.6, with the visitors allowing their opponents an average of 1.0 goal in this period. The hosts’ attacking potential is also supported by an xG of 1.87 compared with Al Shabab’s 1.81, while their superior form and the visitors’ recent defensive weaknesses should determine the outcome after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hazm | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.57 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Hazm is 49% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Al Hazm · 0.67 pts / game - Al Shabab
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hazm is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Al Hazm · 2 goals / game - Al Shabab
Al Hazm scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Al Shabab scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hazm
Over / Under - Al Shabab
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Shabab - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Hazm
Al Shabab
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hazm | Liga | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.88 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 52% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Hazm's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Al Shabab. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Shabab?
The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:1 Al Shabab. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Hazm and Al Shabab?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Hazm won 0, Al Shabab won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Shabab?
Al Hazm score 1.33 goals per game on average and Al Shabab 1.33. The Professional League average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Al Hazm's matches and 67% of Al Shabab's.
What form are Al Hazm and Al Shabab in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Shabab 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Shabab?
The statistical background for Al Hazm vs Al Shabab — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


