Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Neom SC crest
Neom SC
120%(3.54)
X25%(3.35)
255%(1.93)

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Hazm played against Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on January 4, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Al Hazm has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Neom SC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Hazm scores 0.91 goals per game and allows 1.36. Neom SC scores 1.45 and allows 1.64. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of Al Hazm's games and 82% of Neom SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 64%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Neom SC has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.17 per game. Al Hazm takes 10.2 shots per game, while Neom SC takes 12.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Hazm leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Neom SC leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.73 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Hazm's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Neom SC, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Professional League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Al HazmNeom SC
12Shots10
Al HazmNeom SC
1Shots on target5
Al HazmNeom SC
1.26xG1.2
Al HazmNeom SC
2Corners3
Al HazmNeom SC
60Dangerous attacks29
Al HazmNeom SC
14Fouls11
Al HazmNeom SC
0Cards1
Al HazmNeom SC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.91Goals scored / game1.45
Al HazmNeom SC
1.36Goals allowed / game1.64
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Average possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
4Shots on target / game4.45
Al HazmNeom SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.18Shots per game12.73
Al HazmNeom SC
4Shots on target4.45
Al HazmNeom SC
8.9%Shot conversion11.4%
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
1.17xG for1.34
Al HazmNeom SC
1.51xG against1.21
Al HazmNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedNeom SC: Balanced
Al HazmNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Hazm is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Al Hazm · 1.4 pts / game - Neom SC

Al Hazm
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W36% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-4
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
DLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Neom SC
WLDWL
Season result split
45% W18% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-4
1.55 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Neom SC is 59% better for: goals scored per game.

0.91 goals / game - Al Hazm · 1.45 goals / game - Neom SC

Al Hazm is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.36 goals / game - Al Hazm · 1.64 goals / game - Neom SC

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 meczów), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)16
Al HazmNeom SC
15Goals conceded (season)18
Al HazmNeom SC
2.27Average goals per game3.09
Al HazmNeom SC
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Al HazmNeom SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal91%
Al HazmNeom SC
36%2 goals36%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%3 goals18%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal91%
Al HazmNeom SC
36%2 goals45%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%3 goals27%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time36%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%BTTS in both halves18%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%Scored in both halves27%
Al HazmNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al HazmNeom SC
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Al HazmNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Al HazmNeom SC

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Al HazmNeom SC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - Al Hazm · 1.55 pts / game - Neom SC

Al Hazm - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)1.55
Al HazmNeom SC
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Al HazmNeom SC
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Al HazmNeom SC
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.36
Al HazmNeom SC
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC
64%No goal before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per game (2nd half)1
Al HazmNeom SC
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Al HazmNeom SC
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Al HazmNeom SC
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Al HazmNeom SC
36%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Al HazmNeom SC
73%No goal after half-time36%
Al HazmNeom SC

Al Hazm - second-half results

9% W55% D36% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Neom SC - second-half results

9% W73% D18% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Hazm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Neom SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.6
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaNeom SC
Average goals per game 2.273.05 3.09
Both teams scored 55%62% 82%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%56% 64%
Clean sheets 18%22% 9%
Goal before half-time 55%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 64%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Neom SCYellow cardAli Hassan Al Asmari
  2. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Amir SayoudOff: Miguel Carvallho Vianna
  3. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Salman Mohammed Al FarajOff: Alaa Hejji
  4. Al HazmGoalAmir Sayoud

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Khald AlahmariMatches officiated: 8
3.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins38%Draws25%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:2 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

Al Hazm score 0.91 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.45. The Professional League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Al Hazm's matches and 82% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Hazm and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Neom SC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.