Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Neom SC crest
Neom SC
120%(3.54)
X25%(3.35)
255%(1.93)

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hazm play Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 4 January 2026 at 16:05. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hazm scores 1.12 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hazm 59%, Neom SC 65%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 59%, Neom SC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.33. Al Hazm: 11.8 shots per match, Neom SC: 13.0.

Match halves

Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71. Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Al Hazm: 76-90+ (14 goals). Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Al HazmNeom SC
12Shots10
Al HazmNeom SC
1Shots on target5
Al HazmNeom SC
1.26xG1.2
Al HazmNeom SC
2Corners3
Al HazmNeom SC
60Dangerous attacks29
Al HazmNeom SC
14Fouls11
Al HazmNeom SC
0Cards1
Al HazmNeom SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match1.26
Al HazmNeom SC
1.68Goals conceded / match1.41
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Average possession53%
Al HazmNeom SC
4.24Shots on target / match4.71
Al HazmNeom SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.76Shots per match13
Al HazmNeom SC
4.24Shots on target4.71
Al HazmNeom SC
9.5%Shot conversion9.7%
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Possession53%
Al HazmNeom SC
1.33xG for1.43
Al HazmNeom SC
1.45xG against1.34
Al HazmNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedNeom SC: Balanced
Al HazmNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Neom SC is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.2 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm
DLDLW
Season result split
32% W26% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-14
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-7
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Neom SC
DDWLD
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Neom SC is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.26 goals / match - Neom SC

Neom SC is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.41 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)43
Al HazmNeom SC
57Goals conceded (season)48
Al HazmNeom SC
2.79Average goals in match2.68
Al HazmNeom SC
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Al HazmNeom SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal79%
Al HazmNeom SC
41%2 goals32%
Al HazmNeom SC
6%3 goals12%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%4 goals3%
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal82%
Al HazmNeom SC
47%2 goals41%
Al HazmNeom SC
18%3 goals18%
Al HazmNeom SC
12%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%BTTS in both halves12%
Al HazmNeom SC
15%Scored in both halves24%
Al HazmNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Al HazmNeom SC
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Al HazmNeom SC
40%BTTS - last 580%
Al HazmNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Al HazmNeom SC
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Al HazmNeom SC
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Al HazmNeom SC

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Al HazmNeom SC
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Al HazmNeom SC
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Al HazmNeom SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.41 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
32% leading44% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.41
Al HazmNeom SC
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Al HazmNeom SC
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al HazmNeom SC
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.12
Al HazmNeom SC
50%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Al HazmNeom SC
71%No goal before half-time53%
Al HazmNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Al HazmNeom SC
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Al HazmNeom SC
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Al HazmNeom SC
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Al HazmNeom SC
38%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Al HazmNeom SC
50%No goal after half-time44%
Al HazmNeom SC

Al Hazm - second-half results

32% W24% R44% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - second-half results

26% W35% R38% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
9
46-60
2
9
61-75
14
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
10
46-60
3
8
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaNeom SC
Average goals in match 2.793.01 2.68
Both teams scored 59%58% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 53%
Clean sheets 12%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 59%75% 68%
Goal after half-time 85%80% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 0 Neom SC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:2 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

Al Hazm score 1.12 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.26. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Al Hazm's matches and 65% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Hazm and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Neom SC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.