Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

Al Hikma vs Safa: match statistics

Al Hikma crest
Al Hikma
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Safa crest
Safa
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

Al Hikma vs Safa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Hikma played against Safa in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on February 6, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Al Hikma has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Safa has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Hikma scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.23. Safa scores 1.15 and allows 0.62. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 31% of Al Hikma's games and 23% of Safa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 15%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Al Hikma has the higher season xG average, 1.02 to 0.99 per game. Al Hikma takes 6.8 shots per game, while Safa takes 5.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Hikma leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Safa leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Hikma's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Safa, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Lebanese Premier League games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
Al HikmaSafa
7Shots12
Al HikmaSafa
5Shots on target7
Al HikmaSafa
1.11xG1.55
Al HikmaSafa
6Corners3
Al HikmaSafa
43Dangerous attacks41
Al HikmaSafa
-1Fouls-1
Al HikmaSafa
-1Cards-1
Al HikmaSafa

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.08Goals scored / game1.15
Al HikmaSafa
1.23Goals allowed / game0.62
Al HikmaSafa
49%Average possession45%
Al HikmaSafa
3.31Shots on target / game2.38
Al HikmaSafa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.85Shots per game5
Al HikmaSafa
3.31Shots on target2.38
Al HikmaSafa
15.7%Shot conversion23.1%
Al HikmaSafa
49%Possession45%
Al HikmaSafa
1.02xG for0.99
Al HikmaSafa
0.97xG against1.1
Al HikmaSafa

Shooting quality

Al Hikma: Efficient finishingSafa: Counter-attacking
Al HikmaSafa
Accuracy (shots on target)48%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Safa is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Al Hikma · 1.8 pts / game - Safa

Al Hikma
LDLWL
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Safa
LLWWW
Season result split
46% W15% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-5
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

1.08 goals / game - Al Hikma · 1.15 goals / game - Safa

Safa is 98% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.23 goals / game - Al Hikma · 0.62 goals / game - Safa

Al Hikma scoring profile: strong

Al Hikma scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).

Safa scoring profile: mixed

Safa scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)15
Al HikmaSafa
16Goals conceded (season)8
Al HikmaSafa
2.31Average goals per game1.77
Al HikmaSafa
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Al HikmaSafa
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
Al HikmaSafa

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal54%
Al HikmaSafa
31%2 goals31%
Al HikmaSafa
8%3 goals8%
Al HikmaSafa
0%4 goals8%
Al HikmaSafa

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal62%
Al HikmaSafa
46%2 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa
23%3 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa
8%4 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time0%
Al HikmaSafa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HikmaSafa
23%Scored in both halves23%
Al HikmaSafa

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Al HikmaSafa
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al HikmaSafa
20%BTTS - last 50%
Al HikmaSafa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time31%
Al HikmaSafa
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Al HikmaSafa
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Al HikmaSafa

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al HikmaSafa
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
Al HikmaSafa
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Al HikmaSafa

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / game - Al Hikma · 1.62 pts / game - Safa

Al Hikma - half-time state
31% leading23% draw46% trailing
Safa - half-time state
31% leading69% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per game (1st half)1.62
Al HikmaSafa
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Al HikmaSafa
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0
Al HikmaSafa
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.54
Al HikmaSafa
54%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Al HikmaSafa
54%No goal before half-time69%
Al HikmaSafa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per game (2nd half)1.38
Al HikmaSafa
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Al HikmaSafa
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Al HikmaSafa
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Al HikmaSafa
62%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al HikmaSafa
54%No goal after half-time54%
Al HikmaSafa

Al Hikma - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Safa - second-half results

38% W23% R38% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Hikma - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.60
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Safa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.40
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.40.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Safa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
6
0
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al HikmaLigaSafa
Average goals per game 2.312.20 1.77
Both teams scored 31%29% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%38% 15%
Clean sheets 54%43% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%57% 31%
Goal after half-time 69%74% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per game
29%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Al Hikma's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Safa. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Safa
0 : 0
Al Hikma

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hikma vs Safa?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Hikma 1:2 Safa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hikma vs Safa?

Al Hikma score 1.08 goals per game on average and Safa 1.15. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Al Hikma's matches and 23% of Safa's.

What form are Al Hikma and Safa in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hikma have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Safa 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hikma vs Safa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.