Al Hilal vs Neom SC: match statistics
Al Hilal vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Hilal played against Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Venue: Kingdom Arena. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Al Hilal has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Neom SC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Hilal scores 3.40 goals per game and allows 0.60. Neom SC scores 1.40 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Al Hilal's games and 20% of Neom SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 40%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Hilal has the higher season xG average, 2.21 to 1.42 per game. Al Hilal takes 20.0 shots per game, while Neom SC takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Hilal leads at halftime in 80% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Neom SC leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Hilal's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Neom SC, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Hilal top the table and remain unbeaten after 4 league matches, while they have won all 5 of their last five games, scoring 17 goals. At home, the hosts average 3.5 goals per match from 14 shots and 5.5 shots on target, whereas Neom SC score just once on average away from home. The difference in the quality of chances created is reflected in Al Hilal’s xG of 1.71 compared with 1.05 for the visitors, while Neom SC have failed to score in 50% of their away matches. Although the visitors defend solidly, conceding 0.5 goals per away game and recording 50% clean sheets, their recent form includes 2 defeats in their last 5 appearances. Home advantage, Al Hilal’s 100% home win rate and their significantly greater attacking potential point to a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points towards BTTS - No, primarily due to Neom SC’s defense, which concedes just 0.5 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of its games. The visitors have a season BTTS rate of 0%, and failed to score in half of their matches, increasing the likelihood that one side will remain goalless. Al Hilal are in excellent attacking form, averaging 3.4 goals across their last five matches with an xG of 2.13, while also conceding just 0.6 goals per game during that period. Neom SC average 1.05 xG for the season and 1.36 across their last five appearances, but against the in-form hosts, a one-sided result appears more likely than both teams scoring. The last five matches involving both teams produced BTTS in 40% of cases, below the league average of 53%, further supporting the BTTS - No pick, meaning that at least one team is expected not to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Al Hilal are on an excellent five-match winning streak, scoring an average of 3.4 goals in their last 5 games, with an xG of 2.13. Over the same period, Neom averaged 1.4 goals per match but allowed opponents an xG of 1.09, giving the hosts clear potential to score at least twice. Al Hilal average 15.5 shots and 5 shots on target, compared with Neom’s 10 shots and 3 attempts on target. Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of Al Hilal’s last five matches, but caution is advised with the higher line, as neither team has yet played a league match featuring more than 3.5 goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.90 goals and the hosts’ attacking form strongly point to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Hilal are enjoying an outstanding run of five consecutive victories, scoring an average of 3.4 goals and conceding just 0.6 during this period, while Neom SC have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.4 goals scored. The hosts were leading at the break in all five of their last matches, averaging 2.4 goals scored before half-time and conceding just 0.2. Over the same period, Neom SC averaged 0.8 goals before the break and failed to score in the first half in 60% of their matches. Al Hilal’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.68 compared with 1.05 for the visitors, while they average 5.0 shots on target against Neom SC’s 3.0. After the break, the hosts remain defensively more consistent, conceding an average of 0.4 goals across their last five matches. Therefore, the most likely scenario remains an Al Hilal lead at half-time followed by a win at full-time (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hilal | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Hilal is 67% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Al Hilal · 1.8 pts / game - Neom SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hilal is 143% better for: goals scored per game.
3.4 goals / game - Al Hilal · 1.4 goals / game - Neom SC
Al Hilal is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.6 goals / game - Al Hilal · 0.8 goals / game - Neom SC
Al Hilal scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).
Neom SC scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while Al Hilal keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hilal
Over / Under - Neom SC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hilal is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.6 pts / game - Al Hilal · 1.6 pts / game - Neom SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hilal - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +10 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Hilal
Neom SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hilal | Liga | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 46% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 52% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 35% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Hilal's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Neom SC. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hilal vs Neom SC?
The Professional League match finished Al Hilal 0:2 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Hilal and Neom SC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Hilal won 2, Neom SC won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hilal vs Neom SC?
Al Hilal score 3.40 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.40. The Professional League average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Al Hilal's matches and 20% of Neom SC's.
What form are Al Hilal and Neom SC in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hilal have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Neom SC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hilal vs Neom SC?
The statistical background for Al Hilal vs Neom SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


