Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon: match statistics
Al Taawon presents decidedly better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+7), while Al Ittifaq achieves only 33% wins at home with a negative balance (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.89 goals away with an efficiency of 19%, which surpasses the hosts (1.33 goals, 16% efficiency). Al Ittifaq has a high draw rate at home (44%), making this result probable as well. The xG statistics show that Al Taawon generates more chances (1.15 xG) than Al Ittifaq (1.0 xG), while simultaneously defending better (1.11 goals conceded away vs 1.56 for the hosts). The recent form of both teams is similar (1.4 PPG), however, Al Taawon occupies a higher position in the table (5th place vs 7th) and has a better overall season record (12-2-4 vs 8-5-5), which argues for their victory.
Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Ittifaq played against Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on February 3, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Al Ittifaq has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Taawon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Ittifaq scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.67. Al Taawon scores 2.00 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Al Ittifaq's games and 50% of Al Taawon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Taawon has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.13 per game. Al Ittifaq takes 9.4 shots per game, while Al Taawon takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Ittifaq leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. Al Taawon leads at halftime in 56% and scores 1.06 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Ittifaq's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Al Taawon, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Taawon presents decidedly better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+7), while Al Ittifaq achieves only 33% wins at home with a negative balance (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.89 goals away with an efficiency of 19%, which surpasses the hosts (1.33 goals, 16% efficiency). Al Ittifaq has a high draw rate at home (44%), making this result probable as well. The xG statistics show that Al Taawon generates more chances (1.15 xG) than Al Ittifaq (1.0 xG), while simultaneously defending better (1.11 goals conceded away vs 1.56 for the hosts). The recent form of both teams is similar (1.4 PPG), however, Al Taawon occupies a higher position in the table (5th place vs 7th) and has a better overall season record (12-2-4 vs 8-5-5), which argues for their victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ittifaq | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Taawon is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Al Ittifaq · 2 goals / game - Al Taawon
Al Taawon is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Al Ittifaq · 1.11 goals / game - Al Taawon
Al Ittifaq scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
Al Taawon scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ittifaq
Over / Under - Al Taawon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Taawon is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Al Ittifaq · 2 pts / game - Al Taawon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ittifaq - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Ittifaq
Al Taawon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ittifaq | Liga | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.17 | 2.99 | ▲ 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | • 61% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Ittifaq's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Taawon. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?
The Professional League match finished Al Ittifaq 1:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?
Al Ittifaq score 1.50 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 2.00. The Professional League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Al Ittifaq's matches and 50% of Al Taawon's.
What form are Al Ittifaq and Al Taawon in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ittifaq have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Taawon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?
The statistical background for Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.