Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Al Ittifaq presents solid home form with 38% wins and an average of 1.5 goals per match, though their goal difference in home matches is negative (-2). Neom SC impresses with 57% away efficiency and a better average of goals scored (1.86), but their recent form is catastrophic - only 0.6 points per match in the last five meetings and four consecutive losses. A key factor is Neom's advantage in possession (53% vs 47%) and higher scoring efficiency measured by xG (1.27 vs 1.01), suggesting their offensive potential. Given the visitors' poor disposition in recent weeks and the hosts' decent form on their own turf, a draw seems the most probable scenario, though Al Ittifaq has a slight edge thanks to the home ground factor.
Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Ittifaq played against Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on January 21, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Al Ittifaq has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Neom SC has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Ittifaq scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.67. Neom SC scores 1.40 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 3.12 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Al Ittifaq's games and 80% of Neom SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Neom SC has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.17 per game. Al Ittifaq takes 9.7 shots per game, while Neom SC takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Ittifaq leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Neom SC leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Ittifaq's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Neom SC, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.12 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Al Ittifaq presents solid home form with 38% wins and an average of 1.5 goals per match, though their goal difference in home matches is negative (-2). Neom SC impresses with 57% away efficiency and a better average of goals scored (1.86), but their recent form is catastrophic - only 0.6 points per match in the last five meetings and four consecutive losses. A key factor is Neom's advantage in possession (53% vs 47%) and higher scoring efficiency measured by xG (1.27 vs 1.01), suggesting their offensive potential. Given the visitors' poor disposition in recent weeks and the hosts' decent form on their own turf, a draw seems the most probable scenario, though Al Ittifaq has a slight edge thanks to the home ground factor.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ittifaq | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Ittifaq is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Al Ittifaq · 0.6 pts / game - Neom SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ittifaq is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - Al Ittifaq · 1.4 goals / game - Neom SC
Al Ittifaq scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 meczów).
Neom SC scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ittifaq
Over / Under - Neom SC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Neom SC is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / game - Al Ittifaq · 1.47 pts / game - Neom SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ittifaq - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Ittifaq
Neom SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ittifaq | Liga | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 3.12 | • 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 22% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?
The Professional League match finished Al Ittifaq 0:0 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?
Al Ittifaq score 1.67 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.40. The Professional League average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Al Ittifaq's matches and 80% of Neom SC's.
What form are Al Ittifaq and Neom SC in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ittifaq have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Neom SC 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.