Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC: match statistics

Al Ittifaq crest
Al Ittifaq
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Neom SC crest
Neom SC
140%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Al Ittifaq presents solid home form with 38% wins and an average of 1.5 goals per match, though their goal difference in home matches is negative (-2). Neom SC impresses with 57% away efficiency and a better average of goals scored (1.86), but their recent form is catastrophic - only 0.6 points per match in the last five meetings and four consecutive losses. A key factor is Neom's advantage in possession (53% vs 47%) and higher scoring efficiency measured by xG (1.27 vs 1.01), suggesting their offensive potential. Given the visitors' poor disposition in recent weeks and the hosts' decent form on their own turf, a draw seems the most probable scenario, though Al Ittifaq has a slight edge thanks to the home ground factor.

Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Ittifaq play Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 21 January 2026 at 18:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Al Ittifaq: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Ittifaq scores 1.50 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Ittifaq 56%, Neom SC 65%. Over 2.5: Al Ittifaq 59%, Neom SC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.21. Al Ittifaq: 10.3 shots per match, Neom SC: 13.0.

Match halves

Al Ittifaq: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.85. Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Al Ittifaq: 46-60 (11 goals). Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Al Ittifaq presents solid home form with 38% wins and an average of 1.5 goals per match, though their goal difference in home matches is negative (-2). Neom SC impresses with 57% away efficiency and a better average of goals scored (1.86), but their recent form is catastrophic - only 0.6 points per match in the last five meetings and four consecutive losses. A key factor is Neom's advantage in possession (53% vs 47%) and higher scoring efficiency measured by xG (1.27 vs 1.01), suggesting their offensive potential. Given the visitors' poor disposition in recent weeks and the hosts' decent form on their own turf, a draw seems the most probable scenario, though Al Ittifaq has a slight edge thanks to the home ground factor.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Al IttifaqNeom SC
8Shots7
Al IttifaqNeom SC
2Shots on target2
Al IttifaqNeom SC
0.87xG0.8
Al IttifaqNeom SC
4Corners4
Al IttifaqNeom SC
31Dangerous attacks31
Al IttifaqNeom SC
16Fouls14
Al IttifaqNeom SC
3Cards1
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.26
Al IttifaqNeom SC
1.62Goals conceded / match1.41
Al IttifaqNeom SC
49%Average possession53%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
4.35Shots on target / match4.71
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.35Shots per match13
Al IttifaqNeom SC
4.35Shots on target4.71
Al IttifaqNeom SC
14.5%Shot conversion9.7%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
49%Possession53%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
1.21xG for1.43
Al IttifaqNeom SC
1.67xG against1.34
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Ittifaq: Efficient finishingNeom SC: Balanced
Al IttifaqNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ittifaq is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.2 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Ittifaq
WDWLD
Season result split
41% W24% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-12
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Neom SC
DDWLD
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ittifaq is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.26 goals / match - Neom SC

Neom SC is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.41 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Ittifaq scoring profile: very strong

Al Ittifaq scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).

51Goals scored (season)43
Al IttifaqNeom SC
55Goals conceded (season)48
Al IttifaqNeom SC
3.12Average goals in match2.68
Al IttifaqNeom SC
10Goals scored (last 5)6
Al IttifaqNeom SC
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Al IttifaqNeom SC

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal79%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
44%2 goals32%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
21%3 goals12%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
9%4 goals3%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal82%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
47%2 goals41%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
26%3 goals18%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
12%4 goals0%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time21%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
6%BTTS in both halves12%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
32%Scored in both halves24%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
60%BTTS - last 580%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.41 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Ittifaq - half-time state
29% leading35% draw35% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
32% leading44% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.41
Al IttifaqNeom SC
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Al IttifaqNeom SC
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al IttifaqNeom SC
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.12
Al IttifaqNeom SC
47%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
53%No goal before half-time53%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Al IttifaqNeom SC
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Al IttifaqNeom SC
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Al IttifaqNeom SC
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Al IttifaqNeom SC
47%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Al IttifaqNeom SC
41%No goal after half-time44%
Al IttifaqNeom SC

Al Ittifaq - second-half results

35% W26% R38% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - second-half results

26% W35% R38% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ittifaq - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Ittifaq
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
7
16-30
7
12
31-45
11
8
46-60
8
11
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
10
46-60
3
8
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Ittifaq

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al IttifaqLigaNeom SC
Average goals in match 3.123.01 2.68
Both teams scored 56%58% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 53%
Clean sheets 26%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%75% 68%
Goal after half-time 82%80% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Ittifaq 0 - 1 - 0 Neom SC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Ittifaq 0:0 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?

Al Ittifaq score 1.50 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.26. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Al Ittifaq's matches and 65% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Ittifaq and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ittifaq have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Neom SC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittifaq vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.