Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Khaleej vs Al Hazm: match statistics

Al Khaleej crest
Al Khaleej
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
150%(1.85)
X30%(3.80)
220%(3.80)

Al Khaleej displays significantly better scoring form at their own stadium, averaging 1.91 goals per home match with a goal difference of +8, while Al Hazm scores on average only once per game in away matches with a balance of -7. The hosts possess a clear advantage in possession (54% vs 44%) and generate more shots (11.91 vs 9.25), which translates to better efficiency (16% vs 11%). Despite a poor recent series of five matches, Al Khaleej wins 36% of matches at home, while Al Hazm triumphs in only 25% of away matches and rarely keeps a clean sheet (8%). The high percentage of draws for the visitors (42%) and their relatively better form in the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) suggest they may put up resistance, but the hosts' advantage in key home statistics argues for their victory. Considering all factors, Al Khaleej has realistic chances for three points, although the meeting may be competitive.

Al Khaleej vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Khaleej play Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 6 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Al Khaleej: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Khaleej scores 1.59 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Al Hazm scores 1.12 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Khaleej 65%, Al Hazm 59%. Over 2.5: Al Khaleej 68%, Al Hazm 59%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hazm has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.30. Al Khaleej: 11.5 shots per match, Al Hazm: 11.8.

Match halves

Al Khaleej: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.91. Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Al Khaleej: 76-90+ (14 goals). Al Hazm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Al Khaleej displays significantly better scoring form at their own stadium, averaging 1.91 goals per home match with a goal difference of +8, while Al Hazm scores on average only once per game in away matches with a balance of -7. The hosts possess a clear advantage in possession (54% vs 44%) and generate more shots (11.91 vs 9.25), which translates to better efficiency (16% vs 11%). Despite a poor recent series of five matches, Al Khaleej wins 36% of matches at home, while Al Hazm triumphs in only 25% of away matches and rarely keeps a clean sheet (8%). The high percentage of draws for the visitors (42%) and their relatively better form in the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) suggest they may put up resistance, but the hosts' advantage in key home statistics argues for their victory. Considering all factors, Al Khaleej has realistic chances for three points, although the meeting may be competitive.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
12Shots10
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
4Shots on target4
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.41xG1.35
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
4Corners5
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
52Dangerous attacks60
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
9Fouls7
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
4Cards2
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.59Goals scored / match1.12
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.82Goals conceded / match1.68
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
51%Average possession46%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
4.12Shots on target / match4.24
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.47Shots per match11.76
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
4.12Shots on target4.24
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
13.8%Shot conversion9.5%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
51%Possession46%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.3xG for1.33
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.54xG against1.45
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Shooting quality

Al Khaleej: Efficient finishingAl Hazm: Balanced
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hazm is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Al Khaleej · 1 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Khaleej
WLLLL
Season result split
29% W21% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-17
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-9
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Al Hazm
DLDLW
Season result split
32% W26% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-14
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Khaleej is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.59 goals / match - Al Khaleej · 1.12 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Hazm is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Al Khaleej · 1.68 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Khaleej scoring profile: very strong

Al Khaleej scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Al Khaleej keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

54Goals scored (season)38
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
62Goals conceded (season)57
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
3.41Average goals in match2.79
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
14Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal65%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
44%2 goals41%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
24%3 goals6%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
18%4 goals0%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
41%2 goals47%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
29%3 goals18%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
18%4 goals12%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time21%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
35%Scored in both halves15%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
60%BTTS - last 540%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Khaleej is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Al Khaleej · 1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Khaleej - half-time state
29% leading38% draw32% trailing
Al Hazm - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.03
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.03
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
44%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
47%No goal before half-time71%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
2Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
41%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm
44%No goal after half-time50%
Al KhaleejAl Hazm

Al Khaleej - second-half results

41% W18% R41% P
43
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - second-half results

32% W24% R44% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Khaleej - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference-1-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Khaleej
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
9
5
16-30
5
15
31-45
10
12
46-60
7
5
61-75
14
20
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
9
46-60
2
9
61-75
14
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Khaleej

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al KhaleejLigaAl Hazm
Average goals in match 3.413.01 2.79
Both teams scored 65%58% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%56% 59%
Clean sheets 12%23% 12%
Goal before half-time 79%75% 59%
Goal after half-time 88%80% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Khaleej 1 - 0 - 0 Al Hazm. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Al Hazm
1 : 4
Al Khaleej

FAQ

What was the result of Al Khaleej vs Al Hazm?

The Professional League match finished Al Khaleej 2:1 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Khaleej vs Al Hazm?

Al Khaleej score 1.59 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.12. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Al Khaleej's matches and 59% of Al Hazm's.

What form are Al Khaleej and Al Hazm in?

Over the last 5 games Al Khaleej have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Al Hazm 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Khaleej vs Al Hazm?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.