Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr: match statistics
Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Khaleej played against Al Nassr in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: EGO STADIUM. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Al Khaleej has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Al Nassr has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Khaleej scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 1.50. Al Nassr scores 2.50 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Al Khaleej's games and 67% of Al Nassr's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 100%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Nassr has the higher season xG average, 1.96 to 1.03 per game. Al Khaleej takes 8.8 shots per game, while Al Nassr takes 16.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Khaleej leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Al Nassr leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Khaleej's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Al Nassr, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Nassr sit 2nd and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in that span, while Al Khaleej remain winless in all six of their league games this season. Away from home, the visitors average 2.67 goals per match with an xG of 1.88, whereas the hosts score just 0.33 goals per game at home and have failed to find the net in 67% of such appearances. The disparity in chance creation is clear: Al Nassr average 15.67 shots and 7.33 shots on target, compared with Al Khaleej’s 9.33 attempts and 2.67 shots on target. The hosts are also in poor form, having conceded 14 goals across their last five matches, while their average home xG against stands at 1.62. The visitors’ superior finishing and significantly greater attacking potential point to a convincing victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for goals from both sides is strengthened primarily by Al Khaleej’s very weak recent defensive record, having conceded 14 goals in five matches—an average of 2.8 per game. Al Nassr have been exceptionally clinical during this period, scoring 14 goals at an average of 2.8 per match, with an xG of 1.80, making their goal highly likely. Although the hosts have scored only 0.8 goals per game across their last five appearances, Al Nassr have conceded an average of 1.2 goals and allowed opponents an xG of 1.27. Historical BTTS rates stand at 60% for Al Khaleej and 80% for Al Nassr over their last five matches, clearly above the league average of 45%. In addition, both teams are averaging more than 7 shots on target per game, supporting a scenario in which each side scores at least one goal. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is the preferred selection rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 result or a match in which neither side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Al Nassr are in excellent attacking form, averaging 2.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with an average xG of 1.80. Over the same period, Al Khaleej conceded as many as 2.8 goals per game, while their average xG allowed to opponents stood at 1.75, strongly supporting the visitors’ scoring potential. Both teams have recorded 100% of their matches with at least 2 goals this season, and Al Nassr have gone over 2.5 goals in each of their last 5 appearances. The hosts have scored just 0.8 goals per game recently, but Al Nassr have conceded an average of 1.2 goals, making a contribution from Al Khaleej a realistic possibility as well. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.20 goals provides a clear safety margin over this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Nassr are showing considerably better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals and conceding 1.2, while Al Khaleej have failed to win any of their games, scoring just 0.8 goals and allowing opponents to score 2.8. The visitors’ advantage before the break is particularly pronounced: Al Khaleej were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, averaging 0.4 goals scored and 2.2 conceded, while Al Nassr scored an average of 1.4 goals during the same period. The visitors also possess higher creative quality, as reflected by average xG figures of 1.88 compared with the hosts’ 2.04, but their current finishing efficiency and overall results record are considerably better. After the break, Al Nassr continue to average 1.4 goals across their last five appearances and have conceded none, which makes the most likely HT/FT outcome a lead for the visitors at the break followed by an Al Nassr victory in the match: X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Khaleej | Al Nassr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Nassr is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Al Khaleej · 2.4 pts / game - Al Nassr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nassr is 658% better for: goals scored per game.
0.33 goals / game - Al Khaleej · 2.5 goals / game - Al Nassr
Al Nassr is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Al Khaleej · 1 goals / game - Al Nassr
Al Khaleej scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 games), while Al Nassr keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
Al Nassr scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Al Khaleej keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Khaleej
Over / Under - Al Nassr
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nassr is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Al Khaleej · 1.67 pts / game - Al Nassr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Khaleej - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Nassr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -7 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Khaleej
Al Nassr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Khaleej | Liga | Al Nassr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.83 | 2.83 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 57% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 32% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 72% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 66% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Khaleej's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Al Nassr. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr?
The Professional League match finished Al Khaleej 1:1 Al Nassr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Khaleej and Al Nassr?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Khaleej won 0, Al Nassr won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr?
Al Khaleej score 0.33 goals per game on average and Al Nassr 2.50. The Professional League average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Al Khaleej's matches and 67% of Al Nassr's.
What form are Al Khaleej and Al Nassr in?
Over the last 5 games Al Khaleej have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Al Nassr 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Khaleej vs Al Nassr: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


