Al Najma vs Al Hazm: match statistics
Al Najma vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Najma played against Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Al Najma has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Al Hazm has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Najma scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 2.32. Al Hazm scores 1.10 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Al Najma's games and 61% of Al Hazm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 61%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Hazm has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.05 per game. Al Najma takes 9.1 shots per game, while Al Hazm takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Najma leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Al Hazm leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Najma's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For Al Hazm, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Najma has clear defensive issues: only 2 wins this season against 23 losses and a goal record of 29-72; at home they concede an average of 2.27 goals per game and have kept zero clean sheets (0%). Al Hazm has a significantly better points return (10 wins, 8 draws, 13 losses, goals 34-53) and away concedes 1.53 goals on average with 4.13 SOT per match, compared to the hosts' 3.33 SOT. In the last 5 matches Najma scored 6 and conceded 11 (1-1-3), while Hazm scored 5 and conceded 6 (2-1-2), translating to 0.8 pts/match for Najma versus 1.4 pts/match for Hazm. The xG for both teams is almost identical (1.17 for Najma vs 1.18 for Hazm), but the hosts allow higher xG against (1.77 vs 1.51), so the quality of chances created for the opponent favors the visitors. Based on the hosts' poorer defense and the visitors' greater stability, I expect an Al Hazm victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 63% (Al Najma) and 60% (Al Hazm) versus a league average of 59%, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. Al Najma conceded 72 goals this season (1.88 per match) and conceded 11 in their last 5 (2.2 per match), while Al Hazm conceded 53 seasonally (1.53 avg) and 6 in the last 5 (1.2), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Offensively Al Najma averages 1.25 goals scored and xG 1.45 per match; Al Hazm averages 0.93 goals and xG 1.18, and in the last 5 matches the visitors have xG_for 1.59, so the away side also creates chances. Both teams register an average of 4.25 and 4.13 shots on target, have low clean sheet percentages of 13% and 7% and match-no-goal percentages of 31% and 40%, therefore the data signals are stronger for BTTS = Yes. Based on this I select BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 72% versus 28% for No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of 2.75 goals: hosts ~1.50, visitors ~1.25. For Al Najma I consider attacking xG 1.45 and opponents’ xG conceded 1.51 (avg ~1.48), which justifies 1.50 for the hosts; for Al Hazm attacking xG 1.18 and hosts’ defensive xG 1.41 give ~1.30, hence a compromise 1.25 for the visitors with a seasonal conversion rate of 0.93. The line Over 2.5 goals looks attractive because Al Najma has 69% of home matches with over 2.5 goals, Al Hazm 53%, and the league average for over 2.5 is 56%, which combined gives a strong signal for the Over. Additionally both teams concede often: Al Najma have conceded 72 goals this season, Al Hazm 53, and BTTS is 63% for the hosts and 60% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of multiple goals. In the last 5 matches Al Najma average 1.2 goals scored and 2.2 conceded (6 scored, 11 conceded), while Al Hazm average 1.0 and 1.2 (5 scored, 6 conceded), so the strongest value signal is Over 2.5 (I estimate its probability at 66%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a half-time draw and a home win (X/1) as the most likely scenario. Both teams score little in the first half: Al Najma averages 0.38 goals by HT, Al Hazm 0.40, and Al Najma are level at the break in 56% of matches versus 40% for the visitors, which favors a draw at HT. In the second half the home advantage is pronounced — Al Najma have 94% of matches with at least one goal after the break and average 2.13 goals in second halves, and they earn an average of 1.44 points after HT versus 0.93 points for Al Hazm. Additionally, Al Najma have scored 12 goals in minutes 76–90 while Al Hazm have none, and the home xG is 1.45 versus 1.18 for the visitors, which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break in favor of the hosts. For these reasons X/1 receives the highest probability, with X/X as a realistic alternative; other scenarios are less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Najma | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Hazm is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Al Najma · 1.4 pts / game - Al Hazm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hazm is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Al Najma · 1.1 goals / game - Al Hazm
Al Hazm is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.32 goals / game - Al Najma · 1.71 goals / game - Al Hazm
Al Najma scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 meczów).
Al Hazm scores in 65% of games (20 of 31 meczów), while Al Najma keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Najma
Over / Under - Al Hazm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hazm is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.77 pts / game - Al Najma · 1.06 pts / game - Al Hazm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Najma - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 6%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): -18 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Najma
Al Hazm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Najma | Liga | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.26 | 3.04 | ▼ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 57% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 23% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Najma's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Hazm. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
The Professional League match finished Al Najma 2:2 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
Al Najma score 0.94 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.10. The Professional League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Al Najma's matches and 61% of Al Hazm's.
What form are Al Najma and Al Hazm in?
Over the last 5 games Al Najma have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Al Hazm 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Najma vs Al Hazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


