Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueData current as of October 21, 2026

Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia: match statistics

Al Nasar crest
Al Nasar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Al Qadsia crest
Al Qadsia
115%(6.68)
X25%(4.31)
260%(1.37)

Al Qadsia enters this fixture as the clear favorite. Hosts Al Nasar sit in 10th place and possess a disastrous home record—zero wins in three home matches (100% loss rate) and not a single goal scored. In contrast, the visitors occupy 3rd place with a solid away record: 40% win rate, 60% clean sheets, and conceding an average of just 0.6 goals per game. Al Qadsia outperforms their opponents across all key metrics—average possession (58% vs 49%), shots on target (4.4 vs 2.67), xG (1.51 vs 1.26), and recent form (wdwwl vs llwwl). The disparity in quality and current disposition between the two sides is distinct enough that an away victory appears to be the most probable outcome.

Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Nasar played against Al Qadsia in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The game was played on December 31, 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Al Nasar has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Al Qadsia has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Nasar scores 0.40 goals per game and allows 1.60. Al Qadsia scores 1.89 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.32 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 30% of Al Nasar's games and 44% of Al Qadsia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 56%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Al Qadsia has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.10 per game. Al Nasar takes 7.4 shots per game, while Al Qadsia takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Nasar leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. Al Qadsia leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.11 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Nasar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Al Qadsia, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kuwait Premier League games average 2.32 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Qadsia enters this fixture as the clear favorite. Hosts Al Nasar sit in 10th place and possess a disastrous home record—zero wins in three home matches (100% loss rate) and not a single goal scored. In contrast, the visitors occupy 3rd place with a solid away record: 40% win rate, 60% clean sheets, and conceding an average of just 0.6 goals per game. Al Qadsia outperforms their opponents across all key metrics—average possession (58% vs 49%), shots on target (4.4 vs 2.67), xG (1.51 vs 1.26), and recent form (wdwwl vs llwwl). The disparity in quality and current disposition between the two sides is distinct enough that an away victory appears to be the most probable outcome.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

27Possession (%)73
Al NasarAl Qadsia
2Shots13
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0Shots on target4
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.42xG1.67
Al NasarAl Qadsia
1Corners8
Al NasarAl Qadsia
38Dangerous attacks78
Al NasarAl Qadsia
17Fouls13
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0Cards0
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.4Goals scored / game1.89
Al NasarAl Qadsia
1.6Goals allowed / game0.78
Al NasarAl Qadsia
50%Average possession57%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
3Shots on target / game5.22
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.4Shots per game12
Al NasarAl Qadsia
3Shots on target5.22
Al NasarAl Qadsia
5.4%Shot conversion15.7%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
50%Possession57%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
1.1xG for1.49
Al NasarAl Qadsia
1.31xG against1.05
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Shooting quality

Al Nasar: BalancedAl Qadsia: Efficient finishing
Al NasarAl Qadsia
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.130.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Qadsia is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Al Nasar · 1.4 pts / game - Al Qadsia

Al Nasar
LLLWL
Season result split
10% W0% D90% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-9
0.30 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Qadsia
LDWWL
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Qadsia is 372% better for: goals scored per game.

0.4 goals / game - Al Nasar · 1.89 goals / game - Al Qadsia

Al Qadsia is 105% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Al Nasar · 0.78 goals / game - Al Qadsia

Al Nasar scoring profile: more difficult

Al Nasar scores in 30% of games (3 of 10 games), while Al Qadsia keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 games).

Al Qadsia scoring profile: very strong

Al Qadsia scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Al Nasar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 games).

4Goals scored (season)17
Al NasarAl Qadsia
16Goals conceded (season)7
Al NasarAl Qadsia
2Average goals per game2.67
Al NasarAl Qadsia
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Al NasarAl Qadsia
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Al NasarAl Qadsia

How often they score at least...

30%1 goal78%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
10%2 goals44%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0%3 goals33%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0%4 goals22%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal56%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
40%2 goals22%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
10%3 goals0%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
10%4 goals0%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
10%Scored in both halves33%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
40%BTTS - last 520%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Qadsia is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / game - Al Nasar · 1.33 pts / game - Al Qadsia

Al Nasar - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing
Al Qadsia - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per game (1st half)1.33
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.78
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.9Average goals (1st half)1.22
Al NasarAl Qadsia
40%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
80%No goal before half-time67%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per game (2nd half)2
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.2Goals scored (2nd half)1.11
Al NasarAl Qadsia
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Al NasarAl Qadsia
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Al NasarAl Qadsia
30%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Al NasarAl Qadsia
80%No goal after half-time22%
Al NasarAl Qadsia

Al Nasar - second-half results

10% W30% D60% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Qadsia - second-half results

56% W33% D11% L
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Al Nasar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Qadsia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Nasar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
5
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Qadsia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Nasar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
31%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Al Qadsia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al NasarLigaAl Qadsia
Average goals per game▼ 2.002.32▲ 2.67
Both teams scored▼ 30%45%• 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%43%▲ 56%
Clean sheets▼ 0%32%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%68%• 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%77%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.32
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Al Nasar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Qadsia. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Al Qadsia
4 : 0
Al Nasar

FAQ

What was the result of Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Nasar 0:0 Al Qadsia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia?

Al Nasar score 0.40 goals per game on average and Al Qadsia 1.89. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Al Nasar's matches and 44% of Al Qadsia's.

What form are Al Nasar and Al Qadsia in?

Over the last 5 games Al Nasar have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Al Qadsia 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia?

The statistical background for Al Nasar vs Al Qadsia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.