Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueAl Shabab Mubarak Alaiar StadiumData current as of 17 July 2026

Al Qadsia vs Kazma: match statistics

Al Qadsia crest
Al Qadsia
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Kazma crest
Kazma

Al Qadsia vs Kazma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Qadsia play Kazma in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 22 June 2026 at 20:45. Venue: Al Shabab Mubarak Alaiar Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Al Qadsia: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kazma: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Qadsia scores 1.65 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Kazma scores 1.22 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Qadsia 43%, Kazma 48%. Over 2.5: Al Qadsia 48%, Kazma 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Al Qadsia has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.48. Al Qadsia: 11.6 shots per match, Kazma: 12.1.

Match halves

Al Qadsia: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.91. Kazma: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Al Qadsia: 76-90+ (12 goals). Kazma: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Al Qadsia holds a clear offensive edge at home: they average 2.6 goals per home match versus Kazma’s 1.1 on the road, and record 6 shots on target per game compared to 3.2 for the visitors. The hosts’ finishing efficiency is markedly higher (conversion rate 23% vs 9% for Kazma), translating to 35 goals scored by Al Qadsia this season versus 23 for Kazma. Form also favors the hosts — over the last 5 matches Al Qadsia averages 2.0 points per game (form: W W D W L — 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while Kazma averages 0.8 points per game (form: L L W L D — 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses). Defensive metrics on paper are similar (xG against 1.52 vs 1.51 and average goals conceded 0.9 for the hosts vs 0.8 for the visitors), but in the last 5 matches Kazma conceded 9 goals versus 4 conceded by Al Qadsia, indicating worse defensive form for the away side. Considering the superiority in shots on target (6 vs 3.2), higher conversion (23% vs 9%), better form and fewer goals conceded in the last 5 matches (4 vs 9), I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Al QadsiaKazma
7Shots9
Al QadsiaKazma
3Shots on target6
Al QadsiaKazma
1.08xG1.42
Al QadsiaKazma
3Corners5
Al QadsiaKazma
58Dangerous attacks60
Al QadsiaKazma
5Fouls14
Al QadsiaKazma
0Cards0
Al QadsiaKazma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.65Goals scored / match1.22
Al QadsiaKazma
0.87Goals conceded / match0.91
Al QadsiaKazma
54%Average possession53%
Al QadsiaKazma
5.17Shots on target / match3.65
Al QadsiaKazma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.57Shots per match12.09
Al QadsiaKazma
5.17Shots on target3.65
Al QadsiaKazma
14.3%Shot conversion10.1%
Al QadsiaKazma
54%Possession53%
Al QadsiaKazma
1.53xG for1.48
Al QadsiaKazma
1.21xG against1.03
Al QadsiaKazma

Shooting quality

Al Qadsia: Efficient finishingKazma: Balanced
Al QadsiaKazma
Accuracy (shots on target)45%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kazma is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Al Qadsia · 1.6 pts / match - Kazma

Al Qadsia
WLLWD
Season result split
48% W26% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-6
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Kazma
LDWDW
Season result split
43% W35% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Qadsia is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Al Qadsia · 1.22 goals / match - Kazma

Al Qadsia is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Al Qadsia · 0.91 goals / match - Kazma

Al Qadsia scoring profile: strong

Al Qadsia scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Kazma scoring profile: strong

Kazma scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Al Qadsia keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).

38Goals scored (season)28
Al QadsiaKazma
20Goals conceded (season)21
Al QadsiaKazma
2.52Average goals in match2.13
Al QadsiaKazma
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Al QadsiaKazma
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Al QadsiaKazma

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal74%
Al QadsiaKazma
48%2 goals35%
Al QadsiaKazma
26%3 goals9%
Al QadsiaKazma
13%4 goals4%
Al QadsiaKazma

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal61%
Al QadsiaKazma
26%2 goals26%
Al QadsiaKazma
4%3 goals4%
Al QadsiaKazma
4%4 goals0%
Al QadsiaKazma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time9%
Al QadsiaKazma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al QadsiaKazma
26%Scored in both halves17%
Al QadsiaKazma

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Al QadsiaKazma
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Al QadsiaKazma
40%BTTS - last 540%
Al QadsiaKazma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Al QadsiaKazma
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Al QadsiaKazma
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Al QadsiaKazma

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Al QadsiaKazma
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Al QadsiaKazma
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Al QadsiaKazma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Qadsia is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Al Qadsia · 1.43 pts / match - Kazma

Al Qadsia - half-time state
35% leading48% draw17% trailing
Kazma - half-time state
35% leading39% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.43
Al QadsiaKazma
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Al QadsiaKazma
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Al QadsiaKazma
1.09Average goals (1st half)0.87
Al QadsiaKazma
70%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Al QadsiaKazma
61%No goal before half-time57%
Al QadsiaKazma

After half-time (2nd half)

1.7Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Al QadsiaKazma
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Al QadsiaKazma
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Al QadsiaKazma
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Al QadsiaKazma
61%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Al QadsiaKazma
39%No goal after half-time52%
Al QadsiaKazma

Al Qadsia - second-half results

43% W39% R17% P
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kazma - second-half results

26% W52% R22% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Qadsia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kazma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Qadsia
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
9
4
31-45
2
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Qadsia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al QadsiaLigaKazma
Average goals in match 2.522.54 2.13
Both teams scored 43%47% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%44% 35%
Clean sheets 48%30% 39%
Goal before half-time 57%70% 65%
Goal after half-time 78%77% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Al Qadsia 0 - 0 - 2 Kazma. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Kazma
4 : 2
Al Qadsia
Al Qadsia
0 : 1
Kazma

FAQ

What was the result of Al Qadsia vs Kazma?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Qadsia 1:2 Kazma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Qadsia and Kazma?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Qadsia won 0, Kazma won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Qadsia vs Kazma?

Al Qadsia score 1.65 goals per game on average and Kazma 1.22. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Al Qadsia's matches and 48% of Kazma's.

What form are Al Qadsia and Kazma in?

Over the last 5 games Al Qadsia have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kazma 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Qadsia vs Kazma?

The statistical background for Al Qadsia vs Kazma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.