Al Quadisiya vs Al Taawon: match statistics
Al Quadisiya displays excellent form, being undefeated in the last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw) with an 11:3 goal difference. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 67% of home matches with only 8% of games without scoring and an impressive 22-goal difference. Al Taawon, on the other hand, is experiencing a serious form crisis, not winning any of their last 5 matches (2 draws, 3 losses) and conceding 8 goals in this period. The visitors show weakness in away matches, where they lose 45% of games and concede an average of 1.18 goals per match, which combined with low xG (1.17) suggests offensive problems. Given Al Quadisiya's dominance at their own stadium (50% clean sheets, average 2.42 goals per match) and the visitors' poor disposition, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario.
Al Quadisiya vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Quadisiya played against Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Al Quadisiya has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Al Taawon has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Quadisiya scores 2.35 goals per game and allows 0.91. Al Taawon scores 1.78 and allows 1.22. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Al Quadisiya's games and 57% of Al Taawon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 48%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Quadisiya has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.25 per game. Al Quadisiya takes 14.0 shots per game, while Al Taawon takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Quadisiya leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 1.43 goals per game after halftime. Al Taawon leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Quadisiya's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (13 goals). For Al Taawon, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Quadisiya displays excellent form, being undefeated in the last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw) with an 11:3 goal difference. The hosts are extremely effective at home, winning 67% of home matches with only 8% of games without scoring and an impressive 22-goal difference. Al Taawon, on the other hand, is experiencing a serious form crisis, not winning any of their last 5 matches (2 draws, 3 losses) and conceding 8 goals in this period. The visitors show weakness in away matches, where they lose 45% of games and concede an average of 1.18 goals per match, which combined with low xG (1.17) suggests offensive problems. Given Al Quadisiya's dominance at their own stadium (50% clean sheets, average 2.42 goals per match) and the visitors' poor disposition, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Quadisiya | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Quadisiya is 550% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Al Quadisiya · 0.4 pts / game - Al Taawon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Quadisiya is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
2.35 goals / game - Al Quadisiya · 1.78 goals / game - Al Taawon
Al Quadisiya is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.91 goals / game - Al Quadisiya · 1.22 goals / game - Al Taawon
Al Quadisiya scores in 91% of games (21 of 23 meczów), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 meczów).
Al Taawon scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while Al Quadisiya keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Quadisiya
Over / Under - Al Taawon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Quadisiya is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / game - Al Quadisiya · 1.7 pts / game - Al Taawon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Quadisiya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Quadisiya
Al Taawon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Quadisiya | Liga | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.26 | 2.99 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 58% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 55% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 23% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Quadisiya's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Taawon. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Quadisiya vs Al Taawon?
The Professional League match finished Al Quadisiya 1:1 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Quadisiya vs Al Taawon?
Al Quadisiya score 2.35 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.78. The Professional League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Al Quadisiya's matches and 57% of Al Taawon's.
What form are Al Quadisiya and Al Taawon in?
Over the last 5 games Al Quadisiya have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Al Taawon 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Quadisiya vs Al Taawon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.