Saudi Arabia - First DivisionData current as of 22 July 2026

Al Raed vs Al Ula: match statistics

Al Raed crest
Al Raed
3 : 2half-time 0:1
Al Ula crest
Al Ula
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Al Ula demonstrates significantly better away form with a 57% away win rate and an impressive seasonal goal difference of 30:13. The visitors sit in 4th place and hold a positive goal difference of +9 in away matches, whereas Al Raed, in 8th position, shows weaker form, particularly in their last five matches (only 1 point per match). Al Ula is characterized by high efficiency (24% shot conversion) and solid defense (43% clean sheets away), outperforming the hosts in key aspects of the game. Al Raed's recent form (2 consecutive losses) and Al Ula's advantage in expected goals and scoring efficiency support a victory for the visitors.

Al Raed vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Raed play Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 7 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Al Raed: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Al Ula: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Raed scores 1.88 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.17 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Raed 68%, Al Ula 64%. Over 2.5: Al Raed 59%, Al Ula 69%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Al Raed has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.58. Al Raed: 13.4 shots per match, Al Ula: 13.7.

Match halves

Al Raed: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.03. Al Ula: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.94.

Goals by minute

Al Raed: 76-90+ (17 goals). Al Ula: 31-45+ (25 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Al Ula demonstrates significantly better away form with a 57% away win rate and an impressive seasonal goal difference of 30:13. The visitors sit in 4th place and hold a positive goal difference of +9 in away matches, whereas Al Raed, in 8th position, shows weaker form, particularly in their last five matches (only 1 point per match). Al Ula is characterized by high efficiency (24% shot conversion) and solid defense (43% clean sheets away), outperforming the hosts in key aspects of the game. Al Raed's recent form (2 consecutive losses) and Al Ula's advantage in expected goals and scoring efficiency support a victory for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Al RaedAl Ula
14Shots14
Al RaedAl Ula
4Shots on target4
Al RaedAl Ula
1.45xG1.33
Al RaedAl Ula
7Corners3
Al RaedAl Ula
41Dangerous attacks24
Al RaedAl Ula
9Fouls15
Al RaedAl Ula
2Cards5
Al RaedAl Ula

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.88Goals scored / match2.17
Al RaedAl Ula
1.35Goals conceded / match0.92
Al RaedAl Ula
53%Average possession52%
Al RaedAl Ula
4.94Shots on target / match5.25
Al RaedAl Ula

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match13.67
Al RaedAl Ula
4.94Shots on target5.25
Al RaedAl Ula
14.1%Shot conversion15.9%
Al RaedAl Ula
53%Possession52%
Al RaedAl Ula
1.61xG for1.58
Al RaedAl Ula
1.18xG against1.2
Al RaedAl Ula

Shooting quality

Al Raed: Efficient finishingAl Ula: Efficient finishing
Al RaedAl Ula
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ula is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Al Raed · 2.4 pts / match - Al Ula

Al Raed
WLLDW
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Al Ula
WWWWL
Season result split
64% W22% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-8-5
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +45
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-3-4
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ula is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.88 goals / match - Al Raed · 2.17 goals / match - Al Ula

Al Ula is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Al Raed · 0.92 goals / match - Al Ula

Al Raed scoring profile: very strong

Al Raed scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 33% (12 of 36 matches).

Al Ula scoring profile: very strong

Al Ula scores in 92% of matches (33 of 36 matches), while Al Raed keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

64Goals scored (season)78
Al RaedAl Ula
46Goals conceded (season)33
Al RaedAl Ula
3.24Average goals in match3.08
Al RaedAl Ula
12Goals scored (last 5)11
Al RaedAl Ula
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Al RaedAl Ula

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal92%
Al RaedAl Ula
53%2 goals64%
Al RaedAl Ula
26%3 goals36%
Al RaedAl Ula
15%4 goals17%
Al RaedAl Ula

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal67%
Al RaedAl Ula
38%2 goals22%
Al RaedAl Ula
12%3 goals3%
Al RaedAl Ula
6%4 goals0%
Al RaedAl Ula

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time22%
Al RaedAl Ula
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Al RaedAl Ula
32%Scored in both halves44%
Al RaedAl Ula

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Al RaedAl Ula
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Al RaedAl Ula
100%BTTS - last 580%
Al RaedAl Ula

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Al RaedAl Ula
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Al RaedAl Ula
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Al RaedAl Ula

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Al RaedAl Ula
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Al RaedAl Ula
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Al RaedAl Ula

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ula is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / match - Al Raed · 2.25 pts / match - Al Ula

Al Raed - half-time state
44% leading26% draw29% trailing
Al Ula - half-time state
64% leading33% draw3% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)2.25
Al RaedAl Ula
0.85Goals scored (1st half)1.22
Al RaedAl Ula
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Al RaedAl Ula
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.47
Al RaedAl Ula
53%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Al RaedAl Ula
44%No goal before half-time25%
Al RaedAl Ula

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Al RaedAl Ula
1.03Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Al RaedAl Ula
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Al RaedAl Ula
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Al RaedAl Ula
50%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Al RaedAl Ula
38%No goal after half-time39%
Al RaedAl Ula

Al Raed - second-half results

41% W29% R29% P
54
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding93%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Ula - second-half results

36% W42% R22% P
81
Half-time points
44
Half-time goals
+35
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Raed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.00
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Al Ula - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Raed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
7
8
16-30
15
11
31-45
8
6
46-60
10
6
61-75
17
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Al Ula
ScoredConceded
9
0
0-15
10
6
16-30
25
3
31-45
5
7
46-60
10
5
61-75
19
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (25 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Raed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Al Ula

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

Al RaedLigaAl Ula
Average goals in match 3.242.96 3.08
Both teams scored 68%62% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%61% 69%
Clean sheets 24%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 82%76% 78%
Goal after half-time 82%85% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Raed 0 - 0 - 1 Al Ula. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Raed vs Al Ula?

The First Division match finished Al Raed 3:2 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Raed vs Al Ula?

Al Raed score 1.88 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.17. The First Division average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Al Raed's matches and 64% of Al Ula's.

What form are Al Raed and Al Ula in?

Over the last 5 games Al Raed have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Ula 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Raed vs Al Ula?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.