Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Shabab vs Kazma: match statistics

Al Shabab crest
Al Shabab
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Kazma crest
Kazma

Al Shabab vs Kazma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Shabab play Kazma in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 15 May 2026 at 16:40. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Al Shabab: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kazma: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Shabab scores 0.76 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Kazma scores 1.22 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Shabab 48%, Kazma 48%. Over 2.5: Al Shabab 43%, Kazma 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Kazma has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.03. Al Shabab: 8.1 shots per match, Kazma: 12.1.

Match halves

Al Shabab: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.48. Kazma: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Al Shabab: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kazma: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistics clearly favor Kazma: the visitors sit 4th with 6 wins, 6 draws and 2 losses and 16 goals scored (avg. 1.0 away) with xG for 1.57, while Al Shabab at home have 3 wins, 6 draws and 5 losses, 11 goals in the season (0.5 goals per game) and xG for 0.96. Kazma’s defense is significantly more solid — they concede 0.67 goals on average away and keep clean sheets in 50% of away matches, whereas Al Shabab concede 1.83 goals at home and have a -8 goal difference at their stadium; the hosts conceded 14 goals in their last 5 matches (2.8 per game). In chance creation the visitors also dominate: Kazma average 14.17 shots and 3.5 on target away with a 7% conversion, Al Shabab average 8 shots and 2.33 on target at home with a 6% conversion and 50% of matches without scoring. Form confirms Kazma’s advantage — Al Shabab have 0.4 points per game in the last 5 and 0 wins in that period, while Kazma have 2.0 points per game and 3 wins in 5. Considering the xG gap (1.57 vs 0.96), defensive efficiency (0.67 vs 1.83), better form and higher shot volume, I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Al ShababKazma
10Shots9
Al ShababKazma
5Shots on target4
Al ShababKazma
1.75xG1.65
Al ShababKazma
2Corners4
Al ShababKazma
104Dangerous attacks109
Al ShababKazma
8Fouls18
Al ShababKazma
0Cards0
Al ShababKazma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.76Goals scored / match1.22
Al ShababKazma
1.86Goals conceded / match0.91
Al ShababKazma
45%Average possession53%
Al ShababKazma
2.71Shots on target / match3.65
Al ShababKazma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.05Shots per match12.09
Al ShababKazma
2.71Shots on target3.65
Al ShababKazma
9.5%Shot conversion10.1%
Al ShababKazma
45%Possession53%
Al ShababKazma
1.03xG for1.48
Al ShababKazma
1.56xG against1.03
Al ShababKazma

Shooting quality

Al Shabab: BalancedKazma: Balanced
Al ShababKazma
Accuracy (shots on target)34%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kazma is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Al Shabab · 1.6 pts / match - Kazma

Al Shabab
LWLLW
Season result split
24% W29% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kazma
LDWDW
Season result split
43% W35% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kazma is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.76 goals / match - Al Shabab · 1.22 goals / match - Kazma

Kazma is 104% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - Al Shabab · 0.91 goals / match - Kazma

Al Shabab scoring profile: mixed

Al Shabab scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Kazma scoring profile: very strong

Kazma scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

16Goals scored (season)28
Al ShababKazma
39Goals conceded (season)21
Al ShababKazma
2.62Average goals in match2.13
Al ShababKazma
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Al ShababKazma
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Al ShababKazma

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal74%
Al ShababKazma
10%2 goals35%
Al ShababKazma
5%3 goals9%
Al ShababKazma
0%4 goals4%
Al ShababKazma

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal61%
Al ShababKazma
48%2 goals26%
Al ShababKazma
29%3 goals4%
Al ShababKazma
19%4 goals0%
Al ShababKazma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time9%
Al ShababKazma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al ShababKazma
0%Scored in both halves17%
Al ShababKazma

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Al ShababKazma
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Al ShababKazma
40%BTTS - last 540%
Al ShababKazma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Al ShababKazma
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Al ShababKazma
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Al ShababKazma

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Al ShababKazma
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Al ShababKazma
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Al ShababKazma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kazma is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Al Shabab · 1.43 pts / match - Kazma

Al Shabab - half-time state
19% leading38% draw43% trailing
Kazma - half-time state
35% leading39% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)1.43
Al ShababKazma
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Al ShababKazma
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Al ShababKazma
0.95Average goals (1st half)0.87
Al ShababKazma
52%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Al ShababKazma
71%No goal before half-time57%
Al ShababKazma

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Al ShababKazma
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Al ShababKazma
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Al ShababKazma
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Al ShababKazma
33%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Al ShababKazma
67%No goal after half-time52%
Al ShababKazma

Al Shabab - second-half results

19% W24% R57% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kazma - second-half results

26% W52% R22% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Shabab - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kazma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Shabab
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
7
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
7
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Shabab

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
165%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al ShababLigaKazma
Average goals in match 2.622.54 2.13
Both teams scored 48%47% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%44% 35%
Clean sheets 19%30% 39%
Goal before half-time 67%70% 65%
Goal after half-time 81%77% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Shabab 0 - 1 - 0 Kazma. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kazma
1 : 1
Al Shabab

FAQ

What was the result of Al Shabab vs Kazma?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Shabab 0:2 Kazma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Shabab vs Kazma?

Al Shabab score 0.76 goals per game on average and Kazma 1.22. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Al Shabab's matches and 48% of Kazma's.

What form are Al Shabab and Kazma in?

Over the last 5 games Al Shabab have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kazma 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shabab vs Kazma?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.