Al Shamal vs Al Shahaniya: match statistics
Al Shamal vs Al Shahaniya: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Shamal played against Al Shahaniya in Stars League (Qatar). The game was played on September 4, 2026. Venue: Al-Khwar Stadium. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Al Shamal has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Al Shahaniya has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Shamal scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 1.50. Al Shahaniya scores 2.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Al Shamal's games and 100% of Al Shahaniya's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Shahaniya has the higher season xG average, 2.11 to 1.36 per game. Al Shamal takes 11.0 shots per game, while Al Shahaniya takes 17.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Shamal leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 2.50 goals per game after halftime. Al Shahaniya leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Shamal's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Al Shahaniya, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Stars League games average 3.50 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Shamal began the season unbeaten, recording 1 win and 1 draw with a 5:3 goal difference, but their last five matches reveal a clear defensive problem: the team has conceded as many as 14 goals. Al Shahaniya have the better recent form, collecting 7 points from five matches compared with the hosts’ 4, while scoring 8 and conceding 8 goals during that period. Away from home, the visitors generate an average xG of 1.67 and attempt 14 shots per match, but their defense allows opponents an xG of 2.26 and concedes an average of 2 goals. Al Shamal may be able to exploit this vulnerability, although the lack of reliable home data and a poor run of three defeats in their last five appearances limit the hosts’ chances. The combination of both sides’ attacking strengths and defensive issues points to a closely contested match in which a draw is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is clear, as both teams have recorded “both teams to score” in 100% of their matches so far this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Al Shamal score an average of 3.0 goals and concede 2.0, while Al Shahaniya score an average of 1.0 goal and concede 2.0, which points towards goals at both ends. The hosts have a very strong average xG of 2.54 and record 11 shots on target per match, while the visitors allow opponents an xG of 2.26. In their last five matches, Al Shamal scored an average of 2.2 goals and conceded 2.8, while Al Shahaniya scored 1.6 goals, meaning the visitors should have a realistic chance of exploiting their opponents’ defensive weakness. Further confirmation comes from the high league BTTS rate of 83%, making a goal for each team the more likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Al Shamal have scored an average of 2.2 goals and conceded as many as 2.8 in their last five matches, clearly indicating an open game profile. Al Shahaniya average 1.6 goals scored, while both teams have seen Over 2.5 goals in 80% of their last five appearances. The hosts create a high volume of chances, with an average xG of 2.54 and 11 shots on target, while the visitors’ defense allows an average of 2.26 xG. The visitors also possess an attacking threat: their average xG stands at 1.67, and Al Shamal have failed to keep a clean sheet even once. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the combination of a 3.60-goal projection and the high attacking activity of both sides significantly reduces the likelihood of a maximum of one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is for Al Shahaniya to lead at the break, followed by an Al Shamal win, as the hosts were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals before the interval. The visitors are clearly more dangerous during this phase: they scored an average of 0.8 goals before half-time and led in 40% of matches, while Al Shamal scored only 0.2 goals during that period. After the break, the balance reverses, with Al Shamal averaging 2.0 goals, winning the second half in 60% of matches, and avoiding defeat in any of them during their latest run. The hosts’ potential is also confirmed by their higher competition xG, 2.54 compared with 1.67, as well as their average of 21 shots per match versus Al Shahaniya’s 14. The visitors’ defense allows an average xG of 2.26, so even given their strong start, a turnaround by the hosts after half-time is more likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Shamal | Al Shahaniya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Shamal is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Al Shamal · 1.5 pts / game - Al Shahaniya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Shamal is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
2.5 goals / game - Al Shamal · 2 goals / game - Al Shahaniya
Al Shamal is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Al Shamal · 2 goals / game - Al Shahaniya
Al Shamal scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Al Shahaniya keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
Al Shahaniya scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Al Shamal keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Shamal
Over / Under - Al Shahaniya
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Shahaniya is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Al Shamal · 2 pts / game - Al Shahaniya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Shamal - second-half results
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Shahaniya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 2.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Shamal
Al Shahaniya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).
Teams vs league
| Al Shamal | Liga | Al Shahaniya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.50 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 93% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Shamal's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Shahaniya. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Shamal vs Al Shahaniya?
The Stars League match finished Al Shamal 4:2 Al Shahaniya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Shamal and Al Shahaniya?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Shamal won 1, Al Shahaniya won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Shamal vs Al Shahaniya?
Al Shamal score 2.50 goals per game on average and Al Shahaniya 2.00. The Stars League average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Al Shamal's matches and 100% of Al Shahaniya's.
What form are Al Shamal and Al Shahaniya in?
Over the last 5 games Al Shamal have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Al Shahaniya 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shamal vs Al Shahaniya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


