Qatar - Stars LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Al Shamal vs Qatar SC: match statistics

Al Shamal crest
Al Shamal
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Qatar SC crest
Qatar SC

Al Shamal vs Qatar SC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Shamal played against Qatar SC in Stars League (Qatar). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Al Shamal has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Qatar SC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Shamal scores 1.70 goals per game and allows 1.25. Qatar SC scores 1.55 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 3.32 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of Al Shamal's games and 65% of Qatar SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 50%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Al Shamal has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.47 per game. Al Shamal takes 15.1 shots per game, while Qatar SC takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Shamal leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Qatar SC leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.10 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Shamal's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Qatar SC, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Stars League games average 3.32 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a home win (Al Shamal) because at home they average 1.9 goals per game with xG 1.72 and 5.4 shots on target, while Qatar SC as the away team scores 1.4 goals with xG 1.45 and 4.1 shots on target. Al Shamal sit 2nd in the table with 34 goals scored and 25 conceded this season, whereas Qatar SC have 31 scored and 31 conceded, indicating a home advantage in goal balance and defense. The hosts keep 40% clean sheets at home and win 50% of matches at their stadium, while the visitors have only 10% clean sheets on the road and a 30% away win rate, giving Al Shamal an organizational edge. In the last 5 matches Al Shamal scored 6 goals and average 1.8 points per game, and Qatar SC scored 8 goals in their last 5 and average 1.6 points per game, but conceded 8 goals — the visitors are more unstable defensively. Considering the higher xG 1.72 vs 1.45, better conversion rate 13% vs 11% and advantage in shots on target 5.4 vs 4.1, I assign Al Shamal a 62% chance to win, 18% for a draw and 20% for a Qatar SC win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS comes from seasonal percentages: Al Shamal has BTTS in 60% of matches, Qatar SC in 70%, and the league average is 60%, indicating a propensity for both teams to score. Both sides produce similar xG — 1.49 for Al Shamal and 1.45 for Qatar — with xG against of 1.58 and 1.44 respectively, yielding combined expected goals of ~2.94 and favoring goal exchange. In the last 5 matches Al Shamal scored 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceded 7 (1.4), Qatar scored 8 (1.6) and conceded 8 (1.6); recent BTTS rates are 40% versus 60%, so form also supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Additionally, both teams register comparable shots (13.7 vs 13.0) and shots on target (4.1 vs 4.1) with conversion rates of 12% and 11%, and Qatar has only 10% clean sheets versus 40% for Al Shamal, which reduces the likelihood of a No Goal outcome. Therefore I assign 75% to BTTS - Yes and 25% to No Goal — the 'yes' pick is the strongest signal from the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Al Shamal scores an average of 1.7 goals per match (xG 1.49), while Qatar SC averages 1.4 goals (xG 1.45); based on season-long data and the last 5 matches I project ~1.49 xG for the home side and ~1.54 for the visitors, totaling 3.03 expected goals. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurs in 90% of Al Shamal’s matches and 70% of Qatar SC’s matches (average 80%), and the model based on combined xG=3.03 yields about an 81% probability for Over 1.5, making this line the strongest signal. Over 2.5 has moderate support: both teams have a 50% seasonal rate for Over 2.5, the league records 64% of such games, and the model gives ~58% probability for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 looks unlikely — seasonally 40% (home) and 30% (away), and the model gives only ~36% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 (64%) is safer. Additionally, BTTS occurs in 60% of Al Shamal’s matches and 70% of Qatar SC’s, which reinforces the Over 1.5 pick since both teams frequently score.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Al Shamal are slight favorites: seasonally they win 50% of matches versus 30% for Qatar SC and average 1.7 points per game compared to 1.2 for the visitors; the hosts’ xG is 1.49 against the visitors’ 1.45, so the advantage is moderate. First-half signals point to a draw — Al Shamal score an average of 0.6 goals by the break, Qatar only 0.3, and the visitors concede on average 0.3 goals by half-time while keeping a clean sheet at the break in 80% of matches, which raises the probability of a tied score after 45 minutes. However, second-half play is more goal-prone: average goals in second halves are 1.9 in Al Shamal’s matches and 2.2 in Qatar’s matches, and the proportion of matches with at least one goal after the break is 100% for the hosts and 90% for the visitors, so turnarounds after half-time are very likely. Additionally, Al Shamal show better recent form — 60% wins in their last five matches and leading at the break in 40% of cases — and slightly superior shot efficiency (conversion 12% versus 11%), which favors a host win in the second half. On this basis the most reliable signal is Half-Time/Full-Time draw at the break and Al Shamal to win after 90 minutes (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
Al ShamalQatar SC
25Shots7
Al ShamalQatar SC
8Shots on target3
Al ShamalQatar SC
2.73xG0.87
Al ShamalQatar SC
10Corners1
Al ShamalQatar SC
85Dangerous attacks30
Al ShamalQatar SC
11Fouls14
Al ShamalQatar SC
2Cards7
Al ShamalQatar SC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Al ShamalQatar SC
1.7Goals scored / game1.55
Al ShamalQatar SC
1.25Goals allowed / game1.55
Al ShamalQatar SC
51%Average possession48%
Al ShamalQatar SC
5.6Shots on target / game4.1
Al ShamalQatar SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.05Shots per game13.35
Al ShamalQatar SC
5.6Shots on target4.1
Al ShamalQatar SC
11.3%Shot conversion11.6%
Al ShamalQatar SC
51%Possession48%
Al ShamalQatar SC
1.74xG for1.47
Al ShamalQatar SC
1.34xG against1.5
Al ShamalQatar SC

Shooting quality

Al Shamal: AttackingQatar SC: Balanced
Al ShamalQatar SC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Shamal is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Al Shamal · 1.6 pts / game - Qatar SC

Al Shamal
WWLWL
Season result split
55% W20% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-5
1.85 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Qatar SC
WWDLD
Season result split
40% W25% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-7
1.45 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Shamal is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.7 goals / game - Al Shamal · 1.55 goals / game - Qatar SC

Al Shamal is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Al Shamal · 1.55 goals / game - Qatar SC

Al Shamal scoring profile: very strong

Al Shamal scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Qatar SC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

Qatar SC scoring profile: very strong

Qatar SC scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Al Shamal keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

34Goals scored (season)31
Al ShamalQatar SC
25Goals conceded (season)31
Al ShamalQatar SC
2.95Average goals per game3.1
Al ShamalQatar SC
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Al ShamalQatar SC
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al ShamalQatar SC

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal85%
Al ShamalQatar SC
50%2 goals45%
Al ShamalQatar SC
25%3 goals20%
Al ShamalQatar SC
15%4 goals5%
Al ShamalQatar SC

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal75%
Al ShamalQatar SC
45%2 goals40%
Al ShamalQatar SC
15%3 goals25%
Al ShamalQatar SC
5%4 goals10%
Al ShamalQatar SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time15%
Al ShamalQatar SC
10%BTTS in both halves5%
Al ShamalQatar SC
50%Scored in both halves20%
Al ShamalQatar SC

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Al ShamalQatar SC
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al ShamalQatar SC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Al ShamalQatar SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Al ShamalQatar SC
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Al ShamalQatar SC
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Al ShamalQatar SC

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Al ShamalQatar SC
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
Al ShamalQatar SC
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Al ShamalQatar SC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Shamal is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / game - Al Shamal · 1.35 pts / game - Qatar SC

Al Shamal - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing
Qatar SC - half-time state
30% leading45% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per game (1st half)1.35
Al ShamalQatar SC
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Al ShamalQatar SC
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Al ShamalQatar SC
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.05
Al ShamalQatar SC
65%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Al ShamalQatar SC
45%No goal before half-time65%
Al ShamalQatar SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per game (2nd half)1.45
Al ShamalQatar SC
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
Al ShamalQatar SC
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
Al ShamalQatar SC
1.65Average goals (2nd half)2.05
Al ShamalQatar SC
55%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Al ShamalQatar SC
30%No goal after half-time30%
Al ShamalQatar SC

Al Shamal - second-half results

45% W30% D25% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Qatar SC - second-half results

40% W25% D35% L
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Shamal - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Qatar SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-5+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Shamal
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Qatar SC
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
7
31-45
7
7
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Shamal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Qatar SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).

Teams vs league

Al ShamalLigaQatar SC
Average goals per game 2.953.32 3.10
Both teams scored 45%60% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%64% 50%
Clean sheets 40%22% 25%
Goal before half-time 70%73% 55%
Goal after half-time 85%88% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.32
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.68
Away goals / game
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al ShamalYellow cardMichel Termanini
  2. Qatar SCGoalAhmed Al-Rawi
  3. Qatar SCYellow cardEisa Ahmed Palangi
  4. Al ShamalYellow cardBaghdad Bounedjah
  5. Qatar SCRed cardAli Saoudi
  6. Qatar SCSubstitutionOn: Franco Matías Russo PanosOff: Ahmed Al-Rawi
  7. Al ShamalSubstitutionOn: Adam OunasOff: Akram Tawfik
  8. Qatar SCYellow cardMus'ab Al Battat
  9. Qatar SCYellow cardAli Nader Mahmoud
  10. Al ShamalSubstitutionOn: Tamer SeyamOff: Mohamed Naceur Almanai
  11. Qatar SCYellow cardAbdullah Abdulsalam Alahrak
  12. Qatar SCYellow cardSerigne Fallou Diouf

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Al Shamal's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Qatar SC. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Qatar SC
1 : 1
Al Shamal SC

FAQ

What was the result of Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?

The Stars League match finished Al Shamal 0:2 Qatar SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?

Al Shamal score 1.70 goals per game on average and Qatar SC 1.55. The Stars League average is 3.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Al Shamal's matches and 65% of Qatar SC's.

What form are Al Shamal and Qatar SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Shamal have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Qatar SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shamal vs Qatar SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.