Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which points to a draw. Al Sharjah holds a lower position in the standings (8th place) and has terrible home form with a 63% loss rate and a streak of two consecutive home defeats. However, Al Nasr is also not in good shape, recording a streak of four consecutive draws and a high 44% away draw rate this season. The visitors have a better away defense (1.11 goals conceded on average) than the hosts do at home (1.75), but their offense is limited (1.22 goals on average away). Considering the poor form of both teams (0.8 points per game each in their last five matches) and Al Nasr's tendency to draw, the most likely outcome is a share of the points.
Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Sharjah played against Al Nasr in Arabian Gulf League (United Arab Emirates). The game was played on March 11, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Al Sharjah has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Al Nasr has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Sharjah scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.83. Al Nasr scores 1.22 and allows 1.28. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Al Sharjah's games and 61% of Al Nasr's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 39%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Sharjah has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.33 per game. Al Sharjah takes 13.7 shots per game, while Al Nasr takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Sharjah leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. Al Nasr leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Sharjah's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Al Nasr, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Arabian Gulf League games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which points to a draw. Al Sharjah holds a lower position in the standings (8th place) and has terrible home form with a 63% loss rate and a streak of two consecutive home defeats. However, Al Nasr is also not in good shape, recording a streak of four consecutive draws and a high 44% away draw rate this season. The visitors have a better away defense (1.11 goals conceded on average) than the hosts do at home (1.75), but their offense is limited (1.22 goals on average away). Considering the poor form of both teams (0.8 points per game each in their last five matches) and Al Nasr's tendency to draw, the most likely outcome is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Sharjah | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Sharjah is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Al Sharjah · 0.8 pts / game - Al Nasr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Sharjah is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - Al Sharjah · 1.22 goals / game - Al Nasr
Al Nasr is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.83 goals / game - Al Sharjah · 1.28 goals / game - Al Nasr
Al Sharjah scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 meczów), while Al Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
Al Nasr scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Al Sharjah keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Sharjah
Over / Under - Al Nasr
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nasr is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Al Sharjah · 1.56 pts / game - Al Nasr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Sharjah - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Nasr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 28%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Sharjah
Al Nasr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Arabian Gulf League).
Teams vs league
| Al Sharjah | Liga | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.28 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 48% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 27% | • 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 80% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Sharjah's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Nasr. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr?
The Arabian Gulf League match finished Al Sharjah 1:2 Al Nasr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Sharjah and Al Nasr?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Al Sharjah won 2, Al Nasr won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr?
Al Sharjah score 1.44 goals per game on average and Al Nasr 1.22. The Arabian Gulf League average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Al Sharjah's matches and 61% of Al Nasr's.
What form are Al Sharjah and Al Nasr in?
Over the last 5 games Al Sharjah have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Nasr 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr?
The statistical background for Al Sharjah vs Al Nasr — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.