Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: match statistics

Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
165%(1.73)
X22%(3.60)
213%(4.50)

Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Taawon play Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 22 January 2026 at 16:15. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Al Taawon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Taawon scores 1.74 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Al Hazm scores 1.12 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Taawon 65%, Al Hazm 59%. Over 2.5: Al Taawon 53%, Al Hazm 59%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hazm has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.32. Al Taawon: 11.8 shots per match, Al Hazm: 11.8.

Match halves

Al Taawon: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). Al Hazm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Al TaawonAl Hazm
5Shots11
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4Shots on target6
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.83xG1.32
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7Corners1
Al TaawonAl Hazm
33Dangerous attacks30
Al TaawonAl Hazm
9Fouls9
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1Cards1
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.74Goals scored / match1.12
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.35Goals conceded / match1.68
Al TaawonAl Hazm
52%Average possession46%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4.12Shots on target / match4.24
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.79Shots per match11.76
Al TaawonAl Hazm
4.12Shots on target4.24
Al TaawonAl Hazm
14.7%Shot conversion9.5%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
52%Possession46%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.32xG for1.33
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.47xG against1.45
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Shooting quality

Al Taawon: Efficient finishingAl Hazm: Balanced
Al TaawonAl Hazm
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hazm is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon
LWLDL
Season result split
44% W24% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-11
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Hazm
DLDLW
Season result split
32% W26% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-14
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.74 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1.12 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Al Taawon · 1.68 goals / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

59Goals scored (season)38
Al TaawonAl Hazm
46Goals conceded (season)57
Al TaawonAl Hazm
3.09Average goals in match2.79
Al TaawonAl Hazm
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Al TaawonAl Hazm
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al TaawonAl Hazm

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal65%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
47%2 goals41%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
21%3 goals6%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
12%4 goals0%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal88%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
41%2 goals47%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
6%3 goals18%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
3%4 goals12%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
29%Scored in both halves15%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
60%BTTS - last 540%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Al Taawon · 1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm

Al Taawon - half-time state
38% leading35% draw26% trailing
Al Hazm - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.03
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.03
Al TaawonAl Hazm
56%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
50%No goal before half-time71%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Al TaawonAl Hazm
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Al TaawonAl Hazm
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Al TaawonAl Hazm
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al TaawonAl Hazm
38%No goal after half-time50%
Al TaawonAl Hazm

Al Taawon - second-half results

32% W41% R26% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - second-half results

32% W24% R44% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
11
9
46-60
15
6
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
9
46-60
2
9
61-75
14
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al TaawonLigaAl Hazm
Average goals in match 3.093.01 2.79
Both teams scored 65%58% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 59%
Clean sheets 18%23% 12%
Goal before half-time 74%75% 59%
Goal after half-time 85%80% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Taawon 0 - 0 - 1 Al Hazm. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

The Professional League match finished Al Taawon 2:2 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

Al Taawon score 1.74 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.12. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Al Taawon's matches and 59% of Al Hazm's.

What form are Al Taawon and Al Hazm in?

Over the last 5 games Al Taawon have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Al Hazm 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.