Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: match statistics
Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.
Al Taawon vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Taawon played against Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on January 22, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Al Taawon has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Al Hazm has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Taawon scores 2.20 goals per game and allows 1.13. Al Hazm scores 1.00 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Al Taawon's games and 60% of Al Hazm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 60%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Taawon has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.26 per game. Al Taawon takes 11.3 shots per game, while Al Hazm takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Taawon leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Al Hazm leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Taawon's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Al Hazm, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Taawon presents decidedly better form and statistics, occupying 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins this season. The hosts win as many as 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.29 goals per match while conceding only 1.14, which translates to a positive goal difference of +8. Al Hazm sits in 11th position with just 38% away wins and a high rate of 38% matches without scoring a goal on the road. The guests concede an average of 1.25 goals per away match, and their recent form (1.2 points per match) is significantly weaker than the hosts (1.8 points). Additionally, Al Taawon possesses better shot conversion (19% vs 12%) and higher ball possession (52% vs 44%), giving them a clear advantage in this clash. All key statistical indicators point to a certain victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Taawon | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Taawon is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Al Taawon · 1.2 pts / game - Al Hazm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Taawon is 120% better for: goals scored per game.
2.2 goals / game - Al Taawon · 1 goals / game - Al Hazm
Al Taawon is 59% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Al Taawon · 1.8 goals / game - Al Hazm
Al Taawon scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).
Al Hazm scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Taawon
Over / Under - Al Hazm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Taawon is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.13 pts / game - Al Taawon · 1.07 pts / game - Al Hazm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Taawon
Al Hazm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Taawon | Liga | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 3.09 | ▼ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 80% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?
The Professional League match finished Al Taawon 2:2 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?
Al Taawon score 2.20 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.00. The Professional League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Al Taawon's matches and 60% of Al Hazm's.
What form are Al Taawon and Al Hazm in?
Over the last 5 games Al Taawon have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Al Hazm 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Taawon vs Al Hazm?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.