Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia: match statistics
Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Tadhamon played against Al Qadsia in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The game was played on May 19, 2026. Venue: Al-Farwaniya Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Al Tadhamon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Qadsia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Tadhamon scores 0.80 goals per game and allows 1.80. Al Qadsia scores 1.87 and allows 0.93. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Al Tadhamon's games and 53% of Al Qadsia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 53%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Qadsia has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.08 per game. Al Tadhamon takes 7.4 shots per game, while Al Qadsia takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Tadhamon leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Al Qadsia leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Tadhamon's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Al Qadsia, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kuwait Premier League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Qadsia are favorites in this fixture due to a clear advantage in chance creation and quality of chances: the visitors average 13.14 shots per match with xG 1.57 away, versus 7.71 shots and xG 1.16 for the home side at home. The defensive gap is even more telling — Qadsia concede 1.00 goal on average away and keep a clean sheet in 57% of away matches, while Al Tadhamon concede 1.57 goals per home match and maintain a clean sheet in only 14% of games. Over the season the visitors have scored 28 goals and recorded 7 wins, compared to the hosts’ 11 goals and 3 wins, demonstrating greater efficiency and consistency from Qadsia despite similar recent form in the last 5 matches (both teams scored 8 and conceded 7). The hosts have a slightly better points return in the last 5 matches — 1.8 points per match versus 1.6 for the visitors — but this does not offset the visitors’ superiority in possession (59% vs 42%), shot volume and xG. Given these metrics, I assess an away victory as the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes at 70% vs 30% because offensive indicators and recent form favor both teams scoring. Al Tadhamon posts a season BTTS rate of 63% vs Al Qadsia’s 43%, and over the last 5 matches these are 60% and 80% respectively, indicating a strong recent trend for the visitors. Both teams’ xG are similar: 1.48 (home) vs 1.57 (away), and in the last 5 games both sides have averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, increasing the likelihood of exchanged goals. Although Al Qadsia keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches, Al Tadhamon scores on average 2.5 goals per game with a 23% conversion from 5.75 shots on target (versus the opponent’s 1.14 goals and 9% conversion), so the home side can force Al Qadsia to concede. In summary: 63%/43% seasonally, 60%/80% in the last 5 and xG 1.48/1.57 provide a stronger signal for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis shows both teams create a significant number of chances: xG Al Tadhamon is 1.48, xG Al Qadsia 1.57; conceded xG is 1.24 for the home side and 1.04 for the visitors, which averaged yields expected goals of 1.27 for Al Tadhamon and 1.40 for Al Qadsia (total 2.67). These values align with seasonal trends: Al Tadhamon has Over 1.5 in 88% and Over 2.5 in 75% of home matches, while Al Qadsia has Over 1.5 in 71% of fixtures; additionally, in the last 5 matches BTTS is 60% for the home team and 80% for the visitors. Moreover, the hosts have a very high shot conversion rate of 23% with 5.75 shots on target per game versus 9% and 4.43 for the away side, which increases the likelihood of actual goals exceeding xG. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 with high probability, while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely given the expected total of ~2.67 goals and the home side’s seasonal tendency toward high-scoring games.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Tadhamon is clearly stronger this season: the hosts score an average of 2.5 goals per game versus 1.14 for Al Qadsia and collect 2.0 points per match compared to 1.29 for their opponents. Despite similar xG (1.48 for the hosts vs 1.57 for the visitors), the hosts convert chances to goals more efficiently (23% conversion vs 9%) and register more on-target shots 5.75 vs 4.43. At half-time I expect a draw: Al Tadhamon have been level at the break in 4 matches (50%) and average 1.0 goals scored by half-time with 0.25 conceded, while the visitors score 0.71 and concede 0.57 by half-time. In the second half the hosts dominate — they average 1.5 goals after the break, have 100% of home matches with at least one goal after half-time and have won the second half in 80% of their last 5 games, therefore the half-time draw/full-time Al Tadhamon win scenario (X/1) is the most likely (36%), with the half-time/full-time 1/1 outcome the second-strongest signal (22%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Tadhamon | Al Qadsia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Qadsia is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Al Tadhamon · 2 pts / game - Al Qadsia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Qadsia is 134% better for: goals scored per game.
0.8 goals / game - Al Tadhamon · 1.87 goals / game - Al Qadsia
Al Qadsia is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.8 goals / game - Al Tadhamon · 0.93 goals / game - Al Qadsia
Al Tadhamon scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 games), while Al Qadsia keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 games).
Al Qadsia scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 games), while Al Tadhamon keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Tadhamon
Over / Under - Al Qadsia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Qadsia is 202% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.53 pts / game - Al Tadhamon · 1.6 pts / game - Al Qadsia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Tadhamon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Qadsia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Tadhamon
Al Qadsia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Tadhamon | Liga | Al Qadsia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.60 | 2.63 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Tadhamon's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Qadsia. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Tadhamon 0:1 Al Qadsia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
Al Tadhamon score 0.80 goals per game on average and Al Qadsia 1.87. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Al Tadhamon's matches and 53% of Al Qadsia's.
What form are Al Tadhamon and Al Qadsia in?
Over the last 5 games Al Tadhamon have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Qadsia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia?
The statistical background for Al Tadhamon vs Al Qadsia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


