Albion vs Wanderers: match statistics
The match appears to be very evenly balanced, suggesting a draw. Albion shows poor home form with only 25% wins and a goal difference of -1, but they boast a better average xG (1.19 vs 0.95) and higher ball possession (59% vs 49%). Wanderers demonstrate solid away efficiency with 67% wins, but their recent away form is only one win in three matches. Both teams have identical shot accuracy (13%) and a similar average goals per match. Wanderers fail to score less frequently away (33% FTS), which could help them earn a point. Considering the poor form of the hosts and the stability of the visitors, a share of the points seems most likely.
Albion vs Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Albion played against Wanderers in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on March 25, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Albion has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Wanderers has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Albion scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 1.14. Wanderers scores 0.86 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.32 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Albion's games and 43% of Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wanderers has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.15 per game. Albion takes 8.7 shots per game, while Wanderers takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Albion leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Wanderers leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Albion's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Wanderers, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.32 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match appears to be very evenly balanced, suggesting a draw. Albion shows poor home form with only 25% wins and a goal difference of -1, but they boast a better average xG (1.19 vs 0.95) and higher ball possession (59% vs 49%). Wanderers demonstrate solid away efficiency with 67% wins, but their recent away form is only one win in three matches. Both teams have identical shot accuracy (13%) and a similar average goals per match. Wanderers fail to score less frequently away (33% FTS), which could help them earn a point. Considering the poor form of the hosts and the stability of the visitors, a share of the points seems most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data indicates an elevated risk of one team failing to score: Albion has a low seasonal average goal tally (0.75) and a high FTS (50%), while Wanderers have averaged only 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches and have a BTTS rate of just 20%. Although Albion generates decent xG (1.58) and many shots on target (5.0), their finishing efficiency is low (7%), which limits their consistency in scoring. Wanderers' attack appears weaker in creation (xG 0.95; 2.33 shots on target), so even against Albion's average defense (1.5 goals conceded/match), there is no strong signal for them to score. Seasonal BTTS (Albion 50%, Wanderers 33%) and the last 5 matches for both teams (40% and 20%) are below the league average (46%), supporting the BTTS = NO scenario. Overall, the preponderance of statistical arguments suggests that at least one team may finish the match without a goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model indicates a moderate goal count: Albion generates high xG_for (1.58) but has low efficiency (7%) and only 0.75 goals per match, limiting their scoring ceiling. Wanderers in attack have a lower xG_for (0.95) and have been averaging 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, despite Albion's defense conceding a fair amount (1.5 goals conceded per match; xG_against 1.53). Over/Under profiles support a scenario without a goal 'explosion': Over 3.5 is 25% for the hosts and 0% for the visitors, alongside a 100% Under 3.5 rate for Wanderers. Additionally, the league has a relatively high percentage of clean sheets (61%), which statistically favors 0-3 goal results. Therefore, the strongest signal is Under 3.5, while the 2.5 line remains more balanced.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for the half-time result is a draw: Albion draws at HT in as many as 75% of matches and has never led at the break (0%), while the average goals by HT is low (1.5 for the hosts, 1.0 for the visitors), favoring 0-0 or 1-1 scorelines. Wanderers have better results quality this season (2.0 PPG, 67% win rate) and a more solid defense overall (1.0 goal conceded away vs 1.5 for Albion at home), which increases the chance of their win after the break. At the same time, Albion generates more chances (xG 1.58 and 5 shots on target per match vs 0.95 and 2.33 for Wanderers), but has significantly worse conversion rate (7% vs 13%), so they more often 'control the game' without translating it into goals. The goal profile suggests visitors' pressure in the first half (Wanderers score in 0–15, while Albion concede in 0–30); however, the decline in Wanderers' offense in the last 5 matches (0.6 goals per game) increases the probability of a draw at HT. Overall, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is a draw at half-time and a Wanderers win in the second half thanks to better PPG and more stable defense over the 90 minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Albion | Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Wanderers is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Albion · 1.4 pts / game - Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Albion is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Albion · 0.86 goals / game - Wanderers
Albion is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Albion · 1.29 goals / game - Wanderers
Albion scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 meczów), while Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 meczów).
Wanderers scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Albion keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Albion
Over / Under - Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Albion is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Albion · 1 pts / game - Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Albion - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Albion
Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Albion | Liga | Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.29 | 2.32 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 31% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 66% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 75% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Albion vs Wanderers?
The Primera División match finished Albion 2:1 Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Albion vs Wanderers?
Albion score 1.14 goals per game on average and Wanderers 0.86. The Primera División average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Albion's matches and 43% of Wanderers's.
What form are Albion and Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Albion have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Wanderers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Albion vs Wanderers?
The statistical background for Albion vs Wanderers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.