Singapore - S.LeagueData current as of September 08, 2026

Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: match statistics

170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Albirex Niigata S are clearly superior to Tanjong Pagar in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have averaged 2 points per match in their last five games with three wins, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures without picking up a single point. At home, Albirex average 2 goals per match with an xG of 2.21, proving their offensive potency, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals on the road with a very poor xG of 1.14. The visitors have a 100% loss record in away matches and are unable to keep a clean sheet. Shot statistics also favor the hosts—19 attempts per match compared to just 10 for the visitors. All indicators unanimously point to a convincing win for Albirex Niigata S.

Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Albirex Niigata S played against Tanjong Pagar in S.League (Singapore). The game was played on January 17, 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

Albirex Niigata S has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. Tanjong Pagar has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Albirex Niigata S scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. Tanjong Pagar scores 1.40 and allows 3.00. Games in this league average 3.85 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 25% of Albirex Niigata S's games and 60% of Tanjong Pagar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 100%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 80% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Albirex Niigata S has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.31 per game. Albirex Niigata S takes 13.3 shots per game, while Tanjong Pagar takes 11.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Albirex Niigata S leads at halftime in 75% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Tanjong Pagar leads at halftime in 20% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Albirex Niigata S's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Tanjong Pagar, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

S.League games average 3.85 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 80% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Albirex Niigata S are clearly superior to Tanjong Pagar in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have averaged 2 points per match in their last five games with three wins, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures without picking up a single point. At home, Albirex average 2 goals per match with an xG of 2.21, proving their offensive potency, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals on the road with a very poor xG of 1.14. The visitors have a 100% loss record in away matches and are unable to keep a clean sheet. Shot statistics also favor the hosts—19 attempts per match compared to just 10 for the visitors. All indicators unanimously point to a convincing win for Albirex Niigata S.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 2
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
16Shots6
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
8Shots on target3
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
2.13xG1.02
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4Corners4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
78Dangerous attacks58
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
18Fouls7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1Cards2
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
2Goals scored / game1.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.25Goals allowed / game3
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
46%Average possession45%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4.5Shots on target / game3.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.25Shots per game11
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
4.5Shots on target3.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
15.1%Shot conversion12.7%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
46%Possession45%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.62xG for1.31
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.58xG against2.54
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Shooting quality

Albirex Niigata S: Counter-attackingTanjong Pagar: Counter-attacking
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Albirex Niigata S is 192% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / game - Albirex Niigata S · 0.6 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S
DWWL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 75%
Tanjong Pagar
LLWLL
Season result split
20% W0% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 2.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Albirex Niigata S is 43% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Albirex Niigata S · 1.4 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S is 140% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Albirex Niigata S · 3 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S scoring profile: very strong

Albirex Niigata S scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).

Tanjong Pagar scoring profile: mixed

Tanjong Pagar scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Albirex Niigata S keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
5Goals conceded (season)15
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
3.25Average goals per game4.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
5Goals conceded (last 5)15
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
75%2 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%3 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%4 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%2 goals80%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%3 goals40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%4 goals20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Scored in both halves20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%BTTS - last 560%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Albirex Niigata S is 181% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.25 pts / game - Albirex Niigata S · 0.8 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing
Tanjong Pagar - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.25Points per game (1st half)0.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.25Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.6
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.75Average goals (1st half)2
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
25%No goal before half-time60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)0.8
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.4
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar
50%No goal after half-time60%
Albirex Niigata STanjong Pagar

Albirex Niigata S - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tanjong Pagar - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Albirex Niigata S - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.251.50
Goals scored / game1.30.8
Goals allowed / game0.50.8
Average goals per game1.81.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 75% leading - 0% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tanjong Pagar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.61.4
Average goals per game2.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Albirex Niigata S
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tanjong Pagar
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
0
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Albirex Niigata S

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Tanjong Pagar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).

Teams vs league

Albirex Niigata SLigaTanjong Pagar
Average goals per game 3.253.85 4.40
Both teams scored 25%55% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%80% 100%
Clean sheets 50%25% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%85% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / game
2.15
Away goals / game
+-21%
Home attack advantage
+-26%
Home defensive advantage
+-15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
70%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tanjong PagarYellow cardBruno de Araujo Dybal
  2. Albirex Niigata SGoalJo Eun-soo
  3. Tanjong PagarYellow cardChan-Woo Lee
  4. Albirex Niigata SGoalTakumi Yokohata
  5. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Faizal RoslanOff: Chan-Woo Lee
  6. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Naqiuddin EunosOff: Muhammad Syahrul Bin Sazali
  7. Albirex Niigata SYellow cardKim Tae-uk
  8. Albirex Niigata SSubstitutionOn: Shakthi VinayagavijayanOff: Muhammad Haziq bin Kamarudin
  9. Tanjong PagarGoalMuhamad Anaqi bin Ismit
  10. Albirex Niigata SGoalSyed Firdaus Hassan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

The S.League match finished Albirex Niigata S 3:2 Tanjong Pagar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

Albirex Niigata S score 2.00 goals per game on average and Tanjong Pagar 1.40. The S.League average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Albirex Niigata S's matches and 60% of Tanjong Pagar's.

What form are Albirex Niigata S and Tanjong Pagar in?

Over the last 5 games Albirex Niigata S have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Tanjong Pagar 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Albirex Niigata S vs Tanjong Pagar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.