Aluminij vs Bravo: match statistics
Aluminij vs Bravo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Aluminij played against Bravo in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Aluminij has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Bravo has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Aluminij scores 1.45 goals per game and allows 1.76. Bravo scores 1.76 and allows 1.62. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 79% of Aluminij's games and 66% of Bravo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 76% and 69%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bravo has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.33 per game. Aluminij takes 9.7 shots per game, while Bravo takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Aluminij leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.97 goals per game after halftime. Bravo leads at halftime in 52% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Aluminij's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Bravo, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bravo is the favorite based on form and statistics: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.6 points per game over that span, while Aluminij has only 1 win in five and 0.8 pts per game. Offensively Bravo holds a clear advantage — on the road they score 2.0 goals per game with an xG of 1.68, whereas Aluminij at home records 1.47 goals and xG 1.35; in the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 9 goals and the hosts 5. The visitors create more chances: 13.2 shots and 5.0 on target per away game versus 9.93 shots and 4.13 on target for the hosts, which increases their scoring opportunities with the same conversion rate of 15%. Defensively Aluminij concedes 1.8 goals at home on average and has a home goal difference of -5, while Bravo have an away goal difference of +6 and concede 1.6 goals per game, indicating greater stability for the visitors. Overall (form 4-1-0 vs 1-1-3, higher xG and more created chances) I predict a Bravo win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show strong BTTS indicators: Aluminij has a season BTTS of 57%, Bravo 73%, and in the last 5 matches both sides reached 80% BTTS, indicating a clear mutual scoring trend. Goal numbers and xG confirm this — Aluminij has scored 42 and conceded 51 this season, Bravo has scored 51 and conceded 47; average xG is 1.8 (Aluminij) versus 1.68 (Bravo), with xG against of 1.65 and 1.61, meaning both sides create and allow a similar number of chances. Clean sheets are rare (21% for Aluminij and 13% for Bravo), and the percentage of matches with no goal is 21% and 20%, which reduces the likelihood of a nil from either team. Against the league BTTS level of 62% and form (Aluminij 'ldllw', Bravo 'wwdww'), I assign 82% to 'BTTS - Yes' and 18% to 'BTTS - No', therefore I recommend the BTTS = Yes bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams clearly favor matches with at least 2 goals: Aluminij has 93% of games over 1.5, and Bravo 87%. Based on xG (Aluminij xG_for 1.80 vs Bravo defense xG_against 1.61; Bravo xG_for 1.68 vs Aluminij defense xG_against 1.65) I expect about 1.71 goals for Aluminij and 1.67 for Bravo, total ~3.38 goals. Season over-2.5 percentages are 64% for Aluminij and 73% for Bravo (avg ~68.5%), and the league has 64% of matches over 2.5, so Over 2.5 also seems moderately likely (I assess ~72%). Over 3.5 is less certain: season values 29% and 47% average ~38% and expected 3.38 goals is below the 3.5 threshold, so Under 3.5 has the edge. Considering form (Aluminij averaged 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches, Bravo 1.8) and the high rates of both teams scoring (57% for Aluminij and 73% for Bravo), the strongest and safest pick is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 2/2 (away team leads at the break and wins) because Bravo is clearly in superior form: in their last 5 matches they recorded 'wwdww' (4 wins and 1 draw) and average 2.6 points per match versus 0.8 points for Aluminij. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their last 5 fixtures and scored an average of 0.8 first-half goals, while the hosts led at half-time in only 20% of their last 5 and averaged 0.2 first-half goals. In second halves Bravo averages 1.27 goals and has a +8 goal difference in second halves, compared to 0.71 and -3 for Aluminij, which demonstrates the visitors' advantage after the break. Additionally, the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 15% versus 11% for the hosts, and over the last 5 matches the visitors conceded an average of 0.8 goals per game versus 1.6 for the hosts, supporting the scenario of Bravo taking a lead and securing the win. Although Aluminij have led at half-time in 64% of matches this season, the recent metrics (lead at the break frequency and the visitors’ stronger second-half performance) make 2/2 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Aluminij | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Bravo is 225% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Aluminij · 2.6 pts / game - Bravo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bravo is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.45 goals / game - Aluminij · 1.76 goals / game - Bravo
Bravo is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.76 goals / game - Aluminij · 1.62 goals / game - Bravo
Aluminij scores in 90% of games (26 of 29 meczów), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 meczów).
Bravo scores in 79% of games (23 of 29 meczów), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aluminij
Over / Under - Bravo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bravo is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Aluminij · 1.69 pts / game - Bravo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aluminij - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Bravo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 48%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Aluminij
Bravo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Aluminij | Liga | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.21 | 3.09 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 60% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 76% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 83% | 86% | • 86% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Aluminij's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Bravo. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Aluminij vs Bravo?
The PrvaLiga match finished Aluminij 0:1 Bravo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Aluminij and Bravo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Aluminij won 1, Bravo won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Aluminij vs Bravo?
Aluminij score 1.45 goals per game on average and Bravo 1.76. The PrvaLiga average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Aluminij's matches and 66% of Bravo's.
What form are Aluminij and Bravo in?
Over the last 5 games Aluminij have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Bravo 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminij vs Bravo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.