Slovenia - PrvaLigaData current as of 05 August 2026

Aluminij vs Nafta: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Aluminij vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aluminij play Nafta in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match date is 9 August 2026.

Current form

Aluminij: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Nafta: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aluminij scores 0.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Nafta scores 2.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aluminij 0%, Nafta 33%. Over 2.5: Aluminij 0%, Nafta 67%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.10. Aluminij: 9.5 shots per match, Nafta: 12.7.

Match halves

Aluminij: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Nafta: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.67.

Goals by minute

Aluminij: 0-15 (0 goals). Nafta: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.37)
(3.55)
(2.60)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match2.67
AluminijNafta
0.5Goals conceded / match1.33
AluminijNafta
38%Average possession43%
AluminijNafta
2Shots on target / match7.33
AluminijNafta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match12.67
AluminijNafta
2Shots on target7.33
AluminijNafta
0%Shot conversion21.1%
AluminijNafta
38%Possession43%
AluminijNafta
1.1xG for1.67
AluminijNafta
1.8xG against2.18
AluminijNafta

Shooting quality

Aluminij: BalancedNafta: Counter-attacking
AluminijNafta
Accuracy (shots on target)21%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nafta is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / match - Aluminij · 2 pts / match - Nafta

Aluminij
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Nafta
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 2.18BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aluminij is 166% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Aluminij · 1.33 goals / match - Nafta

Aluminij scoring profile: more difficult

Aluminij scores in 0% of matches (0 of 2 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Nafta scoring profile: mixed

Nafta scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

0Goals scored (season)8
AluminijNafta
1Goals conceded (season)4
AluminijNafta
0.5Average goals in match4
AluminijNafta
0Goals scored (last 5)8
AluminijNafta
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
AluminijNafta

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal67%
AluminijNafta
0%2 goals67%
AluminijNafta
0%3 goals67%
AluminijNafta
0%4 goals33%
AluminijNafta

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal67%
AluminijNafta
0%2 goals67%
AluminijNafta
0%3 goals0%
AluminijNafta
0%4 goals0%
AluminijNafta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
AluminijNafta
0%BTTS in both halves33%
AluminijNafta
0%Scored in both halves67%
AluminijNafta

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AluminijNafta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
AluminijNafta
0%BTTS - last 533%
AluminijNafta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AluminijNafta
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AluminijNafta
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
AluminijNafta

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AluminijNafta
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
AluminijNafta
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AluminijNafta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nafta is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Aluminij · 2 pts / match - Nafta

Aluminij - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Nafta - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2
AluminijNafta
0Goals scored (1st half)1
AluminijNafta
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AluminijNafta
0Average goals (1st half)1.67
AluminijNafta
100%Clean sheet before half-time33%
AluminijNafta
100%No goal before half-time33%
AluminijNafta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
AluminijNafta
0Goals scored (2nd half)1.67
AluminijNafta
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
AluminijNafta
0.5Average goals (2nd half)2.33
AluminijNafta
50%Clean sheet after half-time33%
AluminijNafta
100%No goal after half-time33%
AluminijNafta

Aluminij - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nafta - second-half results

67% W0% R33% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aluminij - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.50
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.00.5
1 goal0%50%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match1.72.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aluminij
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
33%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aluminij

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
196%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

AluminijLigaNafta
Average goals in match 0.502.57 4.00
Both teams scored 0%43% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%43% 67%
Clean sheets 50%32% 33%
Goal before half-time 0%86% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%86% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
14%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Aluminij and Nafta play?

Aluminij face Nafta on 9 August 2026 in PrvaLiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Aluminij vs Nafta?

Aluminij score 0.00 goals per game on average and Nafta 2.67. The PrvaLiga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Aluminij's matches and 33% of Nafta's.

What form are Aluminij and Nafta in?

Over the last 5 games Aluminij have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Nafta 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminij vs Nafta?

The statistical background for Aluminij vs Nafta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.