Aluminij vs Nafta: match statistics
Aluminij vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Aluminij played against Nafta in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on August 9, 2026. Venue: Športni Park Aluminij. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Aluminij has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.50 points per game. Nafta has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Aluminij scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. Nafta scores 2.67 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Aluminij's games and 33% of Nafta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 67%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nafta has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.07 per game. Aluminij takes 9.0 shots per game, while Nafta takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Aluminij leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Nafta leads at halftime in 67% and scores 1.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Aluminij's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Nafta, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nafta sit top of the table, while Aluminij are 9th, and the difference is reflected in their current form: the visitors have collected 10 points from their last 5 matches, compared with just 2 for the hosts. Aluminij have scored only 1 goal during this period and have failed to win any of their five games, whereas Nafta have netted 9 goals and won 3 times. At home, the hosts are yet to score, averaging 9 shots per match, with only 3 on target. By contrast, Nafta average 3 goals per away game from 14 shots, 8 of which are on target. The visitors also have a higher average xG of 1.81 compared with Aluminij’s 1.17, although their xG against stands at 2.45, giving the hosts a realistic chance of ending their scoring drought. However, Nafta’s strongest argument remains their perfect record in their only away match so far, along with a clean sheet, while Aluminij have struggled in front of goal.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS comes from Aluminija’s recent form: they have scored just 1 goal in five matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with both teams scoring in only 20% of those fixtures. Nafta are in significantly better shape, having netted 9 goals in their last five appearances while conceding just 4, so they have solid grounds to score, but this does not guarantee a goal from the hosts. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches so far this season, while BTTS has occurred in none of their games; for Aluminija, this figure stands at just 50%. Although Aluminija have recently created chances worth an average of 1.47 xG, their very poor finishing and Nafta’s defensive strength support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score—BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Aluminij are in very poor offensive form: they have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while Nafta have conceded 4 goals during this period. The visitors have been more effective, with 9 goals in five matches and an average of 1.8 goals per game, although their recent fixtures have not been particularly open. Over 2.5 goals landed in just 20% of Aluminij’s last five matches and 40% of Nafta’s games, compared with the league average of 43%. The combined current xG of both teams—1.47 for the hosts and 1.57 for the visitors—suggests a result closer to two than four goals. The Under 3.5 goals line offers the greatest edge, as a projected total of 2.25 goals would require at least four goals to be scored, which is not supported by Aluminij’s form data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nafta are in clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.8 goals and won 60% of their games, while Aluminij scored just 0.2 goals on average, recorded no victories and lost 60% of their matches. Before half-time, the hosts failed to score in any of those five games and went into the break trailing in 60% of them; Nafta led at the break in 40% of their matches and conceded an average of only 0.4 goals during that period. The difference is also reflected in their season-long attacking potential: the visitors generate an xG of 1.81 and average 8 shots on target, compared with Aluminij’s 1.61 xG and 7 shots on target, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 2.04. Nafta kept a clean sheet in 60% of their last first halves and 60% of their second halves, while Aluminij scored just 0.2 goals after the break across their last five matches. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the visitors lead at half-time and go on to win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Aluminij | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 58% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nafta is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.5 pts / game - Aluminij · 2 pts / game - Nafta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aluminij is 166% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Aluminij · 1.33 goals / game - Nafta
Aluminij scores in 0% of games (0 of 2 games), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Nafta scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aluminij
Over / Under - Nafta
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Aluminij · 2 pts / game - Nafta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aluminij - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Aluminij
Nafta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Aluminij | Liga | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 0.50 | 2.47 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 33% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Aluminij vs Nafta?
The PrvaLiga match finished Aluminij 1:1 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Aluminij vs Nafta?
Aluminij score 0.00 goals per game on average and Nafta 2.67. The PrvaLiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Aluminij's matches and 33% of Nafta's.
What form are Aluminij and Nafta in?
Over the last 5 games Aluminij have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Nafta 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminij vs Nafta?
The statistical background for Aluminij vs Nafta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.