Aluminium Arak vs Tractor Sazi: match statistics
Tractor Sazi displays significantly better form and statistics this season. The visitors sit 4th in the table with an impressive record of 6 wins, 9 draws, and just 2 defeats, while Aluminium Arak lies in 13th position with only 4 wins and 9 losses. Form over the last 5 matches clearly favors Tractor Sazi (1.8 points per game) compared to the hosts' disastrous run (0.2 points per game, a streak of 4 losses and 1 draw). On the road, the visitors boast a stellar defense with 75% clean sheets and an average of just 0.38 goals conceded, which gives them an edge against Aluminium Arak's weak offense (failed to score in 50% of home matches). Higher xG values for the visitors (1.54 vs 0.96) and a significantly superior goal difference (+5 vs -1) confirm Tractor Sazi's advantage, although their tendency to draw (63% of away matches) cannot be ignored.
Aluminium Arak vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Aluminium Arak played against Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on January 27, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Aluminium Arak has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Tractor Sazi has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Aluminium Arak scores 0.65 goals per game and allows 1.06. Tractor Sazi scores 1.29 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 1.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Aluminium Arak's games and 41% of Tractor Sazi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 41%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tractor Sazi has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 0.91 per game. Aluminium Arak takes 2.8 shots per game, while Tractor Sazi takes 3.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Aluminium Arak leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Tractor Sazi leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Aluminium Arak's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Tractor Sazi, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.73 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tractor Sazi displays significantly better form and statistics this season. The visitors sit 4th in the table with an impressive record of 6 wins, 9 draws, and just 2 defeats, while Aluminium Arak lies in 13th position with only 4 wins and 9 losses. Form over the last 5 matches clearly favors Tractor Sazi (1.8 points per game) compared to the hosts' disastrous run (0.2 points per game, a streak of 4 losses and 1 draw). On the road, the visitors boast a stellar defense with 75% clean sheets and an average of just 0.38 goals conceded, which gives them an edge against Aluminium Arak's weak offense (failed to score in 50% of home matches). Higher xG values for the visitors (1.54 vs 0.96) and a significantly superior goal difference (+5 vs -1) confirm Tractor Sazi's advantage, although their tendency to draw (63% of away matches) cannot be ignored.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Aluminium Arak | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.32 | 0.54 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.92 | 0.96 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tractor Sazi is 800% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Aluminium Arak · 1.8 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tractor Sazi is 98% better for: goals scored per game.
0.65 goals / game - Aluminium Arak · 1.29 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Tractor Sazi is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - Aluminium Arak · 0.53 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Aluminium Arak scores in 53% of games (9 of 17 meczów), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 meczów).
Tractor Sazi scores in 47% of games (8 of 17 meczów), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aluminium Arak
Over / Under - Tractor Sazi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tractor Sazi is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / game - Aluminium Arak · 1.47 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aluminium Arak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tractor Sazi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Aluminium Arak
Tractor Sazi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Aluminium Arak | Liga | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.71 | 1.73 | • 1.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 38% | ▲ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 35% | 43% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal after half-time | • 59% | 59% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Aluminium Arak's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Tractor Sazi. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Aluminium Arak vs Tractor Sazi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Aluminium Arak 0:1 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Aluminium Arak vs Tractor Sazi?
Aluminium Arak score 0.65 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.29. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Aluminium Arak's matches and 41% of Tractor Sazi's.
What form are Aluminium Arak and Tractor Sazi in?
Over the last 5 games Aluminium Arak have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminium Arak vs Tractor Sazi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.