Aluminium Arak vs Zob Ahan: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Aluminium Arak are in 15th place and have failed to win any of their last 5 matches, scoring just 4 goals during this period. The hosts have very low scoring efficiency at home (0.56 goals per match) and have failed to score in 56% of their home games. Zob Ahan, despite being in 13th place, also show weak away form with just 11% away wins and as many as 78% of matches without scoring a goal. Both teams have a negative goal difference and similar average xG, suggesting little advantage for either side. Considering both teams' poor form, low offensive efficiency, and Zob Ahan's high percentage of away draws (44%), the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
Aluminium Arak vs Zob Ahan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Aluminium Arak played against Zob Ahan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Aluminium Arak has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Zob Ahan has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Aluminium Arak scores 0.63 goals per game and allows 1.05. Zob Ahan scores 0.58 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 1.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Aluminium Arak's games and 26% of Zob Ahan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 21% and 16%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zob Ahan has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 0.91 per game. Aluminium Arak takes 2.4 shots per game, while Zob Ahan takes 4.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Aluminium Arak leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.21 goals per game after halftime. Zob Ahan leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.16 after halftime.
When the teams score
Aluminium Arak's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Zob Ahan, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.75 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Aluminium Arak are in 15th place and have failed to win any of their last 5 matches, scoring just 4 goals during this period. The hosts have very low scoring efficiency at home (0.56 goals per match) and have failed to score in 56% of their home games. Zob Ahan, despite being in 13th place, also show weak away form with just 11% away wins and as many as 78% of matches without scoring a goal. Both teams have a negative goal difference and similar average xG, suggesting little advantage for either side. Considering both teams' poor form, low offensive efficiency, and Zob Ahan's high percentage of away draws (44%), the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Aluminium Arak | Zob Ahan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.38 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.19 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zob Ahan is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Aluminium Arak · 1 pts / game - Zob Ahan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aluminium Arak is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
0.63 goals / game - Aluminium Arak · 0.58 goals / game - Zob Ahan
Zob Ahan is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.05 goals / game - Aluminium Arak · 0.84 goals / game - Zob Ahan
Aluminium Arak scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while Zob Ahan keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 meczów).
Zob Ahan scores in 32% of games (6 of 19 meczów), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aluminium Arak
Over / Under - Zob Ahan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zob Ahan is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Aluminium Arak · 1.32 pts / game - Zob Ahan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aluminium Arak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Zob Ahan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 16%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Aluminium Arak
Zob Ahan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Aluminium Arak | Liga | Zob Ahan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.68 | 1.75 | ▼ 1.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 38% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 27% | ▼ 16% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 32% | 42% | • 42% |
| Goal before half-time | • 53% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 61% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Aluminium Arak's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Zob Ahan. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Aluminium Arak vs Zob Ahan?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Aluminium Arak 1:0 Zob Ahan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Aluminium Arak vs Zob Ahan?
Aluminium Arak score 0.63 goals per game on average and Zob Ahan 0.58. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Aluminium Arak's matches and 26% of Zob Ahan's.
What form are Aluminium Arak and Zob Ahan in?
Over the last 5 games Aluminium Arak have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Zob Ahan 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminium Arak vs Zob Ahan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.