Türkiye - Süper LigDiyarbakır Atatürk StadyumuData current as of November 02, 2026

Amed vs Eyüpspor: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
5 : 1half-time 3:0
Eyüpspor crest
Eyüpspor

Amed vs Eyüpspor: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Amed played against Eyüpspor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: Diyarbakır Atatürk Stadyumu. Final score: 5:1.

Recent form

Amed has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Eyüpspor has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Amed scores 2.22 goals per game and allows 1.11. Eyüpspor scores 0.22 and allows 2.56. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of Amed's games and 11% of Eyüpspor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 78% and 44%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.29 per game. Amed takes 15.8 shots per game, while Eyüpspor takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Amed leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Eyüpspor leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.11 after halftime.

When the teams score

Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Eyüpspor, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Süper Lig games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed sit 2nd and have won all of their last 5 home matches, while 18th-placed Eyüpspor have lost all 4 of their away games so far. The hosts average 2.8 goals scored and 0.6 conceded at home, while the visitors are yet to score away from home and concede an average of 3.5 goals. Amed have scored 13 goals and remain unbeaten in their last 5 matches, whereas Eyüpspor have failed to score, conceding as many as 17. The quality of chances also favors the hosts: their home xG is 1.59, compared with the 1.96 xG conceded by the visitors away from home. Although Eyüpspor’s away xG stands at 1.09, their lack of finishing so far makes an Amed win by far the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to Eyüpspor failing to score: the visitors have not found the net in their last 5 matches, and their BTTS rate over that period is 0%. They have also averaged no goals away from home and finished without scoring in 100% of their away matches, although their xG of 1.09 suggests they are capable of creating chances. Amed have averaged 2.6 goals in their last 5 matches, while Eyüpspor have conceded 3.4, making a home goal considerably more likely. Although Amed have kept a clean sheet in 0% of their home matches, the visitors’ five-match scoring drought outweighs that factor. Therefore, a scenario in which only Amed score is more likely than both teams scoring (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Amed have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 per game, while Eyüpspor have conceded 17 in that period, an average of 3.4. This gap points to the hosts scoring at least twice, although their average xG of 1.45 calls for caution on higher goal lines. The visitors have failed to score in their last 5 matches, so it is difficult to base the forecast on their contribution. Over 1.5 goals has the strongest signal: it landed in 60% of Amed’s matches and 75% of Eyüpspor’s, while the visitors’ weak defense further increases the likelihood of the line being covered.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Eyüpspor were trailing at half-time in all 4 of their away matches, conceding an average of 2.25 goals in the first half and scoring none. Amed led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches overall, although they did not do so in any of their 5 home matches, which limits confidence in the first-half prediction. In their last 5 matches, Amed won 4 times and scored an average of 2.6 goals, while Eyüpspor suffered 5 defeats, failed to score and conceded an average of 3.4 goals. After the break during this period, Amed scored an average of 1.8 goals, while Eyüpspor conceded 1.6, which supports the hosts holding on to a potential lead. Therefore, Amed leading at half-time and winning the match is the most likely scenario, although a half-time draw remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
AmedEyüpspor
20Shots8
AmedEyüpspor
7Shots on target2
AmedEyüpspor
1.95xG0.81
AmedEyüpspor
7Corners2
AmedEyüpspor
28Dangerous attacks22
AmedEyüpspor
18Fouls5
AmedEyüpspor
2Cards1
AmedEyüpspor

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.22Goals scored / game0.22
AmedEyüpspor
1.11Goals allowed / game2.56
AmedEyüpspor
48%Average possession50%
AmedEyüpspor
5.11Shots on target / game3.67
AmedEyüpspor

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.78Shots per game11.89
AmedEyüpspor
5.11Shots on target3.67
AmedEyüpspor
14.1%Shot conversion1.9%
AmedEyüpspor
48%Possession50%
AmedEyüpspor
1.59xG for1.29
AmedEyüpspor
1.17xG against1.56
AmedEyüpspor

Shooting quality

Amed: AttackingEyüpspor: Balanced
AmedEyüpspor
Accuracy (shots on target)32%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.06

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Amed
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Eyüpspor
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
11% W0% D89% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-8
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 909% better for: goals scored per game.

2.22 goals / game - Amed · 0.22 goals / game - Eyüpspor

Amed is 131% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.11 goals / game - Amed · 2.56 goals / game - Eyüpspor

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 games), while Eyüpspor keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 games).

Eyüpspor scoring profile: more difficult

Eyüpspor scores in 11% of games (1 of 9 games), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).

20Goals scored (season)2
AmedEyüpspor
10Goals conceded (season)23
AmedEyüpspor
3.33Average goals per game2.78
AmedEyüpspor
13Goals scored (last 5)0
AmedEyüpspor
5Goals conceded (last 5)17
AmedEyüpspor

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal11%
AmedEyüpspor
78%2 goals11%
AmedEyüpspor
33%3 goals0%
AmedEyüpspor
11%4 goals0%
AmedEyüpspor

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
AmedEyüpspor
44%2 goals56%
AmedEyüpspor
0%3 goals33%
AmedEyüpspor
0%4 goals22%
AmedEyüpspor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
AmedEyüpspor
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AmedEyüpspor
44%Scored in both halves11%
AmedEyüpspor

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
AmedEyüpspor
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
AmedEyüpspor
60%BTTS - last 50%
AmedEyüpspor

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
AmedEyüpspor
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AmedEyüpspor
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
AmedEyüpspor

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
AmedEyüpspor
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
AmedEyüpspor
56%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
AmedEyüpspor

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 505% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Amed · 0.22 pts / game - Eyüpspor

Amed - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Eyüpspor - half-time state
0% leading22% draw78% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)0.22
AmedEyüpspor
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.11
AmedEyüpspor
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)1.44
AmedEyüpspor
1Average goals (1st half)1.56
AmedEyüpspor
56%Clean sheet before half-time11%
AmedEyüpspor
56%No goal before half-time89%
AmedEyüpspor

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.56
AmedEyüpspor
1.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.11
AmedEyüpspor
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.11
AmedEyüpspor
2.33Average goals (2nd half)1.22
AmedEyüpspor
56%Clean sheet after half-time33%
AmedEyüpspor
11%No goal after half-time89%
AmedEyüpspor

Amed - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Eyüpspor - second-half results

11% W22% D67% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.22
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Amed - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.80
Goals scored / game0.81.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Eyüpspor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.000.20
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game1.81.6
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-9-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Amed
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
0
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
0
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Eyüpspor
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
0
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
6
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.4 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
10%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Eyüpspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
17%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaEyüpspor
Average goals per game▲ 3.332.89▼ 2.78
Both teams scored▲ 56%46%▼ 11%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 78%59%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 33%30%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%76%▲ 89%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%82%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.28
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EyüpsporSubstitutionOn: Hamza Yiğit AkmanOff: Talha Ulvan
  2. EyüpsporYellow cardJawad El Yamiq
  3. EyüpsporSubstitutionOn: Ahmed AbdullahiOff: Yusuf Barasi
  4. AmedSubstitutionOn: Yira Collins SorOff: Dia Sabi'A
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Mohamed KhalilOff: Gift Emmanuel Orban
  6. EyüpsporSubstitutionOn: Arda YavuzOff: Lenny Pintor
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Kahraman DemirtaşOff: Cengiz Umut Meraş
  8. AmedRed cardSamuel Ballet

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs Eyüpspor?

The Süper Lig match finished Amed 5:1 Eyüpspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Eyüpspor?

Amed score 2.22 goals per game on average and Eyüpspor 0.22. The Süper Lig average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Amed's matches and 11% of Eyüpspor's.

What form are Amed and Eyüpspor in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Eyüpspor 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Eyüpspor?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.