Türkiye - Süper LigSeyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1Data current as of September 19, 2026

Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir: match statistics

Amed crest
Amed
5 : 0half-time 1:0
İstanbul Başakşehir crest
İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Amed played against İstanbul Başakşehir in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Seyrantepe Spor Kompleksi Stadyumu 1. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Amed has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. İstanbul Başakşehir has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Amed scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. İstanbul Başakşehir scores 1.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.95 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Amed's games and 75% of İstanbul Başakşehir's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.39 per game. Amed takes 14.0 shots per game, while İstanbul Başakşehir takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Amed leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. İstanbul Başakşehir leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For İstanbul Başakşehir, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Süper Lig games average 2.95 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed are clearly more effective at home, averaging 2.5 goals per match from 15 shots and 6 shots on target, while İstanbul Başakşehir score just 1 goal away from home. The hosts have won both of their home matches so far, whereas the visitors have lost every away fixture, conceding as many as 2 goals per game on average. The difference in the quality of chances created is reflected in Amed’s xG of 1.58 compared with the visitors’ 1.30, while Başakşehir allow opponents an average xG of 2.00. Amed also have the more solid home defense, conceding 0.5 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of fixtures, while the visitors have yet to record an away match without conceding. Recent form also favors the hosts, who have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, while Başakşehir have won just 1 of their last 5 games.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear: Amed recorded BTTS in 67% of matches, while İstanbul Başakşehir did so in as many as 100%, compared with the league average of 53%. The visitors have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.00 goals per match, which aligns well with Amed’s average of 1.67 goals and 1.41 xG per game. Başakşehir score an average of 1.00 goal but register 4.00 shots on target per match, while the hosts have conceded 1.60 goals per game over their last five appearances. Both teams have scored in every match this season, as their percentage of games without scoring stands at 0%, reducing the risk of a BTTS No scenario. BTTS landed for both sides in 60% of their last five matches, making goals at both ends the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Amed averages 1.67 goals at home, while Başakşehir concedes as many as 2.00 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the outlook for the home side to score. In their last five matches, Amed averaged 2.0 goals scored, while both teams conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period. Each team has exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in league matches in 100% of cases so far, and the visitors have kept no clean sheets. The creative potential also points towards goals: average xG stands at 1.35 for Amed and 1.39 for Başakşehir. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as the data strongly supports at least two goals, while the 2.5 and 3.5 lines carry greater risk.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Amed have a clear advantage in their home results: they average 1.67 goals, while İstanbul Başakşehir concede as many as 2.00 goals away from home and have lost all of their matches so far. The hosts led at the break in 2 of their 3 home games, while the visitors have yet to go into half-time ahead; additionally, the away side have failed to keep a clean sheet. Amed’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 1.41 compared with Başakşehir’s 2.00 xGA. In their last five matches, Amed have scored an average of 1.4 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas the visitors have lost the second half in 60% of their matches. The most likely scenario, therefore, is for the hosts to take the lead before half-time and hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
4 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
22Shots7
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
6Shots on target1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
2.11xG0.83
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
3Corners3
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
44Dangerous attacks43
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
9Fouls9
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1Cards2
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.75Goals scored / game1.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.25Goals allowed / game1.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Average possession53%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
4.25Shots on target / game3.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14Shots per game13.25
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
4.25Shots on target3.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
12.5%Shot conversion11.3%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Possession53%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.43xG for1.39
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.14xG against1.4
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Shooting quality

Amed: Attackingİstanbul Başakşehir: Balanced
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
Accuracy (shots on target)30%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Amed is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / game - Amed · 1 pts / game - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed
WLWD
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%
İstanbul Başakşehir
WLDL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 17% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Amed · 1.5 goals / game - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Amed · 1.5 goals / game - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while İstanbul Başakşehir keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).

İstanbul Başakşehir scoring profile: very strong

İstanbul Başakşehir scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).

7Goals scored (season)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
5Goals conceded (season)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
3Average goals per game3
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
75%2 goals50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%3 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%4 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%2 goals50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%3 goals25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%4 goals0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

75%
İstanbul Başakşehir - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 4 games
52%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Scored in both halves25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%BTTS - last 575%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

İstanbul Başakşehir is 250% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Amed · 1.75 pts / game - İstanbul Başakşehir

Amed - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
İstanbul Başakşehir - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
75%No goal before half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per game (2nd half)1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
2Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir
25%No goal after half-time50%
Amedİstanbul Başakşehir

Amed - second-half results

75% W0% D25% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

İstanbul Başakşehir - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Amed - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.502.25
Goals scored / game0.31.5
Goals allowed / game0.80.5
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
İstanbul Başakşehir - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.751.00
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.51.0
Average goals per game1.31.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Amed
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

İstanbul Başakşehir
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

İstanbul Başakşehir

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

AmedLigaİstanbul Başakşehir
Average goals per game 3.002.95 3.00
Both teams scored 50%52% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%55% 50%
Clean sheets 25%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%81% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. İstanbul BaşakşehirYellow cardChristopher Operi
  2. İstanbul BaşakşehirGoalEmin Bayram
  3. İstanbul BaşakşehirYellow cardUmut Güneş
  4. AmedYellow cardErmal Krasniqi
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Amadou CisséOff: Mohamed Khalil
  6. İstanbul BaşakşehirSubstitutionOn: Ivan BrnićOff: Abbosbek Fayzullayev
  7. İstanbul BaşakşehirSubstitutionOn: Berkay ÖzcanOff: Eldor Azamat Shomurodov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

The Süper Lig match finished Amed 5:0 İstanbul Başakşehir. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

Amed score 1.75 goals per game on average and İstanbul Başakşehir 1.50. The Süper Lig average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Amed's matches and 75% of İstanbul Başakşehir's.

What form are Amed and İstanbul Başakşehir in?

Over the last 5 games Amed have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and İstanbul Başakşehir 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir?

The statistical background for Amed vs İstanbul Başakşehir — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.